Postpartum Hemorrhagic Morbidity with Scheduled versus Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery at Term.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1055/a-2437-0759
Rachel L Wiley, Suneet P Chauhan, Emily A Johnson, Ipsita Ghose, Hailie N Ciomperlik, Hector Mendez-Figueroa
{"title":"Postpartum Hemorrhagic Morbidity with Scheduled versus Unscheduled Cesarean Delivery at Term.","authors":"Rachel L Wiley, Suneet P Chauhan, Emily A Johnson, Ipsita Ghose, Hailie N Ciomperlik, Hector Mendez-Figueroa","doi":"10.1055/a-2437-0759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to compare the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcomes (CMHOs) among term (≥37 weeks) singletons who had scheduled versus unscheduled cesarean deliveries (CDs). A subgroup analysis was done for those without prior uterine surgeries.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> Retrospectively, we identified all singletons at term who had CDs. The unscheduled CDs included individuals admitted with a plan for vaginal delivery with at least 1 hour of attempted labor. CMHOs included any of the following: estimated blood loss of ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics (excluding prophylactic oxytocin) or Bakri balloon, surgical management of hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, thromboembolism, admission to intensive care unit, or maternal death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of 8,623 deliveries in the study period, 2,691 (31.2%) had CDs at term, with 1,709 (67.3%) scheduled CDs, and 983 (36.5%) unscheduled CDs. Overall, the rate of CMHO was 23.3%, and the rate of blood transfusion was 4.1%. CMHOs were two-fold higher among unscheduled (34.5%) than scheduled CDs (16.9%; aRR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.81-2.63). The aRRs for blood transfusion and surgical interventions to manage postpartum hemorrhage were three times higher with unscheduled than scheduled CDs. The subgroup analysis indicated that among the cohorts without prior uterine surgery, the rate of the CMHOs was significantly higher when the CD was unscheduled versus scheduled (aRR 1.85; 95% CI 1.45-2.37).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Compared to scheduled CDs, the composite hemorrhagic adverse outcomes were significantly higher with unscheduled CDs.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of hemorrhage.. · Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of transfusion.. · Atony treatment is higher in unscheduled cesareans..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2437-0759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective:  This study aimed to compare the composite maternal hemorrhagic outcomes (CMHOs) among term (≥37 weeks) singletons who had scheduled versus unscheduled cesarean deliveries (CDs). A subgroup analysis was done for those without prior uterine surgeries.

Study design:  Retrospectively, we identified all singletons at term who had CDs. The unscheduled CDs included individuals admitted with a plan for vaginal delivery with at least 1 hour of attempted labor. CMHOs included any of the following: estimated blood loss of ≥1,000 mL, use of uterotonics (excluding prophylactic oxytocin) or Bakri balloon, surgical management of hemorrhage, blood transfusion, hysterectomy, thromboembolism, admission to intensive care unit, or maternal death. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results:  Of 8,623 deliveries in the study period, 2,691 (31.2%) had CDs at term, with 1,709 (67.3%) scheduled CDs, and 983 (36.5%) unscheduled CDs. Overall, the rate of CMHO was 23.3%, and the rate of blood transfusion was 4.1%. CMHOs were two-fold higher among unscheduled (34.5%) than scheduled CDs (16.9%; aRR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.81-2.63). The aRRs for blood transfusion and surgical interventions to manage postpartum hemorrhage were three times higher with unscheduled than scheduled CDs. The subgroup analysis indicated that among the cohorts without prior uterine surgery, the rate of the CMHOs was significantly higher when the CD was unscheduled versus scheduled (aRR 1.85; 95% CI 1.45-2.37).

Conclusion:  Compared to scheduled CDs, the composite hemorrhagic adverse outcomes were significantly higher with unscheduled CDs.

Key points: · Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of hemorrhage.. · Unscheduled cesareans are at higher risk of transfusion.. · Atony treatment is higher in unscheduled cesareans..

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预产期与非预产期剖宫产的产后出血发病率。
研究目的本研究旨在比较足月(≥37周)单胎产妇按计划与非按计划剖宫产(CDs)的综合产妇出血结局(CMHOs)。研究设计:研究设计:通过回顾性分析,我们确定了所有在足月时进行剖宫产的单胎。非计划内分娩包括入院时计划经阴道分娩且至少经过 1 小时尝试性分娩的产妇。CMHOs包括以下任何一种情况:估计失血量≥1,000 mL、使用子宫收缩剂(不包括预防性催产素)或巴克里球囊、手术治疗出血、输血、子宫切除术、血栓栓塞、入住重症监护室或产妇死亡。使用具有稳健误差方差的多变量泊松回归模型来估计调整后相对风险(aRR)及 95% 置信区间(CI):在研究期间的 8,623 例分娩中,2,691 例(31.2%)在临产时发生了子宫内膜异位症,其中 1,709 例(67.3%)为计划内子宫内膜异位症,983 例(36.5%)为计划外子宫内膜异位症。总体而言,CMHO 的发生率为 23.3%,输血率为 4.1%。非计划内 CD 的 CMHO 率(34.5%)是计划内 CD 的两倍(16.9%;aRR = 2.18;95% CI:1.81-2.63)。输血和外科手术治疗产后出血的 aRRs 是计划外 CD 的三倍。亚组分析表明,在未进行过子宫手术的队列中,非计划性产后出血的CMHOs发生率明显高于计划性产后出血(aRR为1.85;95% CI为1.45-2.37):结论:与计划内剖宫产相比,计划外剖宫产的综合出血不良后果明显更高:- 要点:非计划剖宫产的出血风险更高。- 非计划剖宫产的输血风险更高。- 非计划性剖宫产的无子宫治疗率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Is the Risk of Intrahepatic Cholestasis Increased with Supplemental Progesterone? Management, Utilization, and Outcomes of Preterm Labor in an Integrated Health Care System. Therapeutic Hypothermia for Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: Reducing Variability in Practice through a Collaborative Telemedicine Initiative. Antenatal Breast Milk Expression Survey of Individuals Whose Pregnancy Was Complicated by Diabetes: Exploring Knowledge, Perceptions, Experiences, and Milk Volume Expressed. Treatment for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Using Nonpharmacological Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1