Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11947-4
Ann-Therese Hedqvist, Catharina Lindberg, Heidi Hagerman, Ann Svensson, Mirjam Ekstedt
{"title":"Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care.","authors":"Ann-Therese Hedqvist, Catharina Lindberg, Heidi Hagerman, Ann Svensson, Mirjam Ekstedt","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11947-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although coordination of care and integrated care models aim to enhance patient satisfaction and perceived care quality, evidence regarding their practical implementation remains scarce. Understanding the nuances of collaboration across care providers to achieve effective coordination of care is imperative for seamless care integration. The aim of this study was to construct a grounded theory of how inter-organizational collaboration is performed to support coordination of care for patients with complex care needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative design with a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied. In total, 86 participants with diverse backgrounds were recruited across multiple care settings, including hospitals, ambulance services, primary care centers, municipal home healthcare and home care services. The grounded theory was developed iteratively, based on a combination of observations and interviews, and using constant comparative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Coordination of care, a complex process that occurs across interconnected healthcare organizations, is manifested as \"Negotiating care in organizational borderlands.\" Care coordination evolves through a spectrum of inter-organizational collaboration, ranging from \"Dividing care by disease-specific expertise\" to \"Establishing paths for collaboration\" and ultimately \"Co-constructing a comprehensive whole.\" These categories highlight the challenges of coordinating care across both professional and organizational boundaries. In the multifaceted healthcare landscape, effective care coordination occurs when healthcare professionals actively bridge the divides, leveraging their collective expertise. Importantly, organizational boundaries may serve a purpose and should not be dissolved to facilitate effective care coordination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The key to effective care coordination lies in robust inter-organizational collaboration. Even when patients receive integrated care, healthcare professionals may have fragmented roles. This research emphasizes the importance of clearly defined lines of accountability, reinforcing mutual responsibility and facilitating bridging of professional and organizational boundaries. Healthcare professionals and policymakers can use these insights to effectively utilize inter-organizational collaboration in supporting care coordination for patients with complex care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"1438"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11947-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although coordination of care and integrated care models aim to enhance patient satisfaction and perceived care quality, evidence regarding their practical implementation remains scarce. Understanding the nuances of collaboration across care providers to achieve effective coordination of care is imperative for seamless care integration. The aim of this study was to construct a grounded theory of how inter-organizational collaboration is performed to support coordination of care for patients with complex care needs.

Methods: A qualitative design with a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied. In total, 86 participants with diverse backgrounds were recruited across multiple care settings, including hospitals, ambulance services, primary care centers, municipal home healthcare and home care services. The grounded theory was developed iteratively, based on a combination of observations and interviews, and using constant comparative analysis.

Results: Coordination of care, a complex process that occurs across interconnected healthcare organizations, is manifested as "Negotiating care in organizational borderlands." Care coordination evolves through a spectrum of inter-organizational collaboration, ranging from "Dividing care by disease-specific expertise" to "Establishing paths for collaboration" and ultimately "Co-constructing a comprehensive whole." These categories highlight the challenges of coordinating care across both professional and organizational boundaries. In the multifaceted healthcare landscape, effective care coordination occurs when healthcare professionals actively bridge the divides, leveraging their collective expertise. Importantly, organizational boundaries may serve a purpose and should not be dissolved to facilitate effective care coordination.

Conclusions: The key to effective care coordination lies in robust inter-organizational collaboration. Even when patients receive integrated care, healthcare professionals may have fragmented roles. This research emphasizes the importance of clearly defined lines of accountability, reinforcing mutual responsibility and facilitating bridging of professional and organizational boundaries. Healthcare professionals and policymakers can use these insights to effectively utilize inter-organizational collaboration in supporting care coordination for patients with complex care needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织边界地区的护理谈判:协调护理中组织间合作的基础理论。
背景:尽管协调护理和综合护理模式旨在提高患者满意度和可感知的护理质量,但有关其实际实施的证据仍然很少。要实现无缝护理整合,就必须了解护理提供方之间为实现有效护理协调而开展合作的细微差别。本研究旨在构建一个基础理论,说明如何开展组织间合作,以支持对有复杂护理需求的患者进行护理协调:方法:采用建构主义基础理论方法进行定性设计。共招募了 86 名具有不同背景的参与者,他们来自多个医疗机构,包括医院、救护车服务机构、初级医疗中心、市级家庭医疗保健机构和家庭护理服务机构。在观察和访谈相结合的基础上,采用不断比较分析的方法,反复发展了基础理论:结果:医疗协调是一个复杂的过程,它发生在相互关联的医疗机构之间,表现为 "在组织边界地带的医疗协商"。从 "根据特定疾病的专业知识划分护理 "到 "建立合作途径",再到最终的 "共同构建一个全面的整体",护理协调在不同的组织间合作中不断发展。这些类别凸显了跨越专业和组织界限协调医疗服务所面临的挑战。在多方面的医疗保健环境中,当医疗保健专业人员积极弥合分歧,利用他们的集体专业知识时,就能实现有效的医疗协调。重要的是,组织边界可以起到一定的作用,但不应为了促进有效的护理协调而被打破:结论:有效医疗协调的关键在于组织间的紧密合作。即使患者接受了综合护理,医护人员也可能扮演着各自为政的角色。这项研究强调了明确界定责任界限、加强相互责任以及促进专业和组织界限弥合的重要性。医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者可以利用这些见解,有效利用组织间合作,为有复杂护理需求的患者提供护理协调支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Distribution and predictors of haemophilia-related costs in the United Kingdom: analysis of the CHESS I and CHESS II burden of illness studies. Negotiating care in organizational borderlands: a grounded theory of inter-organizational collaboration in coordination of care. Regulation, modification, and evolution of remote sign language interpreting in Sweden - a service in progress. Clinician attitudes towards adoption of evidence-based practice: a nationwide multiprofessional cross-sectional study of child and adolescent mental health services in Sweden. Access to medicines for the treatment of chronic diseases in Chile: qualitative analysis of perceived patient barriers and facilitators in five regions of the country.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1