Temporomandibular joint assessment in MRI images using artificial intelligence tools: Where are we now? A systematic review.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dento maxillo facial radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1093/dmfr/twae055
Mitul Manek, Ibraheem Maita, Diego Filipe Bezerra Silva, Daniela Pita de Melo, Paul W Major, Jacob L Jaremko, Fabiana T Almeida
{"title":"Temporomandibular joint assessment in MRI images using artificial intelligence tools: Where are we now? A systematic review.","authors":"Mitul Manek, Ibraheem Maita, Diego Filipe Bezerra Silva, Daniela Pita de Melo, Paul W Major, Jacob L Jaremko, Fabiana T Almeida","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twae055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize the current evidence on the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc assessment and TMJ internal derangement diagnosis in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were gathered by searching five electronic databases and partial grey literature up to May 27th, 2024. Studies in humans using AI algorithms to detect or to diagnose internal derangements in MRI images were included. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic of Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and a proposed checklist for dental AI studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review. Most of studies assessed disc position. One study assessed disc perforation. A high heterogeneity related to the patient selection domain was found between the studies. The studies used a variety of AI approaches and performance metrics with CNN based models being the most used. A high performance of AI models compared to humans was reported with accuracy ranging from 70% to 99%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The integration of AI, particularly deep learning, in TMJ MRI shows promising results as a diagnostic-assistance tool to segment TMJ structures and to classify disc position. Further studies exploring more diverse and multicenter data will improve the validity and generalizability of the models before being implemented in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize the current evidence on the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc assessment and TMJ internal derangement diagnosis in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images.

Methods: Studies were gathered by searching five electronic databases and partial grey literature up to May 27th, 2024. Studies in humans using AI algorithms to detect or to diagnose internal derangements in MRI images were included. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic of Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) and a proposed checklist for dental AI studies.

Results: Thirteen studies were included in this systematic review. Most of studies assessed disc position. One study assessed disc perforation. A high heterogeneity related to the patient selection domain was found between the studies. The studies used a variety of AI approaches and performance metrics with CNN based models being the most used. A high performance of AI models compared to humans was reported with accuracy ranging from 70% to 99%.

Conclusions: The integration of AI, particularly deep learning, in TMJ MRI shows promising results as a diagnostic-assistance tool to segment TMJ structures and to classify disc position. Further studies exploring more diverse and multicenter data will improve the validity and generalizability of the models before being implemented in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用人工智能工具对磁共振成像图像中的颞下颌关节进行评估:我们现在在哪里?系统综述。
目的:总结人工智能(AI)算法在磁共振成像(MRI)图像中用于颞下颌关节(TMJ)椎间盘评估和颞下颌关节内部错位诊断的性能方面的现有证据:通过检索五个电子数据库和截至 2024 年 5 月 27 日的部分灰色文献来收集相关研究。其中包括使用人工智能算法检测或诊断核磁共振成像图像内部病变的人类研究。研究的方法学质量采用准确性诊断研究质量评估工具-2(QUADAS-2)和牙科人工智能研究拟议检查表进行评估:本系统综述共纳入 13 项研究。大多数研究评估了椎间盘位置。一项研究评估了椎间盘穿孔。研究之间在患者选择方面存在高度异质性。这些研究使用了多种人工智能方法和性能指标,其中使用最多的是基于 CNN 的模型。据报道,与人类相比,人工智能模型具有很高的性能,准确率从 70% 到 99% 不等:在颞下颌关节 MRI 中整合人工智能,尤其是深度学习,显示出作为诊断辅助工具分割颞下颌关节结构和分类椎间盘位置的良好效果。在将模型应用于临床实践之前,对更多样化和多中心数据的进一步研究将提高模型的有效性和可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging. Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology. The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919 - Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks - Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks - Open access option - ISSN: 0250-832X - eISSN: 1476-542X
期刊最新文献
Carotid calcifications in panoramic radiographs can predict vascular risk. Preparing for downstream tasks in AI for dental radiology: a baseline performance comparison of deep learning models. Temporomandibular joint assessment in MRI images using artificial intelligence tools: Where are we now? A systematic review. Gray values and noise behavior of cone-beam computed tomography machines-an in vitro study. A novel method for measuring the direction and angle of Central ray and predicting rotation center via panorama phantom.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1