Maurizio Vecchi, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Giancarla Fiori, Paolo Bocus, Marino Carnovali, Paola Cesaro, Guido Costamagna, Dhanai Di Paolo, Luca Elli, Olga Fedorishina, Carsten Hinkel, Ralf Jakobs, Sergey Kashin, Michela Magnoli, Gianpiero Manes, Ekaterina Melnikova, Anna Orsatti, Thierry Ponchon, Alberto Prada, Franco Radaelli, Sandro Sferrazza, Pietro Soru, Jean Christophe Valats, Victor Veselov, Cristiano Spada, Peter Uebel
{"title":"Mannitol for bowel preparation: Efficacy and safety results from the SATISFACTION randomised clinical trial.","authors":"Maurizio Vecchi, Gian Eugenio Tontini, Giancarla Fiori, Paolo Bocus, Marino Carnovali, Paola Cesaro, Guido Costamagna, Dhanai Di Paolo, Luca Elli, Olga Fedorishina, Carsten Hinkel, Ralf Jakobs, Sergey Kashin, Michela Magnoli, Gianpiero Manes, Ekaterina Melnikova, Anna Orsatti, Thierry Ponchon, Alberto Prada, Franco Radaelli, Sandro Sferrazza, Pietro Soru, Jean Christophe Valats, Victor Veselov, Cristiano Spada, Peter Uebel","doi":"10.1016/j.dld.2024.09.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bowel preparation represents a significant issue to high-quality colonoscopy. Oral mannitol requires a single dose, is of low volume, and has a pleasant taste and rapid action.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This SATISFACTION study compared single-dose (same day) oral mannitol 100 g/750 mL with standard split-dose PEG-ASC2 L (MoviPrep®).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with adequate bowel cleansing. Secondary endpoints included efficacy (adenoma detection rate, caecal intubation rate, time of evacuation), safety (intestinal gases concentration, haemato-chemical parameters, adverse events), and patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 703 patients (352 treated with mannitol and 351 with PEG-ASC). Mannitol was not inferior to PEG-ASC for the primary endpoint (91.1 % and 95.5 %, respectively; p-value for the non-inferiority =0.0131). There was no significant difference for secondary efficacy endpoints. The acceptability profile was significantly better in the mannitol group for ease of use, taste, and willingness to reuse (p < 0.0001 for all). The concentration of intestinal gases (H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>) was similar between groups and well below those potentially critical.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SATISFACTION study indicated that low-volume, single-dose mannitol may satisfy an unmet clinical need since it was more acceptable to the patient and not inferior to the split-dose PEG-ASC for bowel cleansing efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11268,"journal":{"name":"Digestive and Liver Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive and Liver Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2024.09.024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bowel preparation represents a significant issue to high-quality colonoscopy. Oral mannitol requires a single dose, is of low volume, and has a pleasant taste and rapid action.
Aims: This SATISFACTION study compared single-dose (same day) oral mannitol 100 g/750 mL with standard split-dose PEG-ASC2 L (MoviPrep®).
Methods: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with adequate bowel cleansing. Secondary endpoints included efficacy (adenoma detection rate, caecal intubation rate, time of evacuation), safety (intestinal gases concentration, haemato-chemical parameters, adverse events), and patient satisfaction.
Results: The study included 703 patients (352 treated with mannitol and 351 with PEG-ASC). Mannitol was not inferior to PEG-ASC for the primary endpoint (91.1 % and 95.5 %, respectively; p-value for the non-inferiority =0.0131). There was no significant difference for secondary efficacy endpoints. The acceptability profile was significantly better in the mannitol group for ease of use, taste, and willingness to reuse (p < 0.0001 for all). The concentration of intestinal gases (H2, CH4) was similar between groups and well below those potentially critical.
Conclusions: The SATISFACTION study indicated that low-volume, single-dose mannitol may satisfy an unmet clinical need since it was more acceptable to the patient and not inferior to the split-dose PEG-ASC for bowel cleansing efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Digestive and Liver Disease is an international journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. It is the official journal of Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF); Italian Association for the Study of the Pancreas (AISP); Italian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SIED); Italian Association for Hospital Gastroenterologists and Digestive Endoscopists (AIGO); Italian Society of Gastroenterology (SIGE); Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology (SIGENP) and Italian Group for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IG-IBD).
Digestive and Liver Disease publishes papers on basic and clinical research in the field of gastroenterology and hepatology.
Contributions consist of:
Original Papers
Correspondence to the Editor
Editorials, Reviews and Special Articles
Progress Reports
Image of the Month
Congress Proceedings
Symposia and Mini-symposia.