{"title":"Intraperitoneal and Extraperitoneal Pringle Hepatic Hilar Occlusion in Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Liang He, Wei-Xiang Li, Da-Chen Zhou, Yong Wang, Xiao-Ping Geng, Min Yang, Jiong Gu, Hui Hou","doi":"10.1007/s11596-024-2942-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Pringle hepatic hilar occlusion with a bulldog clamp in laparoscopic liver resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From March 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021, 80 patients were enrolled, including 40 undergoing intraperitoneal Pringle maneuver (IPM) and 40 extraperitoneal Pringle maneuver (EPM). The observation indices included basic preoperative clinical characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative liver function indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in the basic characteristics or types of hepatectomy, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, or hepatectomy time between the IPM and EPM groups. However, the blocking and operation time in the IPM group was shorter than that in the EPM group. There were no significant differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels on the first day after surgery or in total bilirubin (TBIL) or albumin (ALB) levels on the first, third, or fifth days after surgery. However, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the first and third days, ALT and AST levels on the third and fifth days were lower, and hospital stay after surgery was shorter in the IPM group than in the EPM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IPM using bulldog clamps is simple, safe, and effective. The inflammatory reaction is less severe, the degree of liver function injury is lower, and recovery is faster.</p>","PeriodicalId":10820,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"1210-1216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2942-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Pringle hepatic hilar occlusion with a bulldog clamp in laparoscopic liver resection.
Methods: From March 1, 2020 to July 31, 2021, 80 patients were enrolled, including 40 undergoing intraperitoneal Pringle maneuver (IPM) and 40 extraperitoneal Pringle maneuver (EPM). The observation indices included basic preoperative clinical characteristics and intraoperative and postoperative liver function indices.
Results: There were no significant differences in the basic characteristics or types of hepatectomy, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, or hepatectomy time between the IPM and EPM groups. However, the blocking and operation time in the IPM group was shorter than that in the EPM group. There were no significant differences in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels on the first day after surgery or in total bilirubin (TBIL) or albumin (ALB) levels on the first, third, or fifth days after surgery. However, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels on the first and third days, ALT and AST levels on the third and fifth days were lower, and hospital stay after surgery was shorter in the IPM group than in the EPM group.
Conclusion: IPM using bulldog clamps is simple, safe, and effective. The inflammatory reaction is less severe, the degree of liver function injury is lower, and recovery is faster.
期刊介绍:
Current Medical Science provides a forum for peer-reviewed papers in the medical sciences, to promote academic exchange between Chinese researchers and doctors and their foreign counterparts. The journal covers the subjects of biomedicine such as physiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, pathology and pathophysiology, etc., and clinical research, such as surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and otorhinolaryngology etc. The articles appearing in Current Medical Science are mainly in English, with a very small number of its papers in German, to pay tribute to its German founder. This journal is the only medical periodical in Western languages sponsored by an educational institution located in the central part of China.