Machine Learning-Based Detection of Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study in A Population of Iranian Female Patients.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Journal of Fertility & Sterility Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.22074/ijfs.2024.2009338.1519
Behnaz Nouri, Seyed Hesan Hashemi, Delaram J Ghadimi, Siavash Roshandel, Meisam Akhlaghdoust
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Detection of Endometriosis: A Retrospective Study in A Population of Iranian Female Patients.","authors":"Behnaz Nouri, Seyed Hesan Hashemi, Delaram J Ghadimi, Siavash Roshandel, Meisam Akhlaghdoust","doi":"10.22074/ijfs.2024.2009338.1519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endometriosis, is a prevalent condition among women of childbearing age, characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands. It is associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of endometriosis is often delayed in many patients. While laparoscopic investigation is required for a definitive diagnosis, physical examination combined with ultrasonography can provide reasonably accurate detection. Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise tools in medical imaging and diagnostics. However, there is a lack of sufficient ML studies focusing on Iranian endometriosis female patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different ML algorithms for endometriosis detection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, our objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of different ML algorithms in classifying suspicious cases of endometriosis using ultrasonographic signs. Our data set consisted of 505 patients, among which 149 were confirmed cases of endometriosis. We divided the data set into training and test sets to train and evaluate the performance of the ML models. To ensure robust evaluation, we employed stratified 5-fold cross-validation and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a measure of model performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the test set, a total of 37 out of 127 patients (29.1%) were diagnosed with endometriosis, while in the training set, 112 out of 378 patients (29.6%) were confirmed to have the condition. Sensitivities ranged from 59.5 to 75.7%, and specificities ranged from 71.7 to 83.3%. Notably, the SVM, Random Forest, Extra-Trees, and Gradient Boosting models exhibited the highest performance, with AUCs of 0.76.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study supports the use of ML models for the screening and diagnosis of endometriosis. The superior performance of the SVM, Random Forest, Extra-Trees, and Gradient Boosting models, as indicated by their high AUCs, suggests their potential as valuable tools in improving the accuracy of endometriosis detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":14080,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","volume":"18 4","pages":"362-366"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fertility & Sterility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2024.2009338.1519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endometriosis, is a prevalent condition among women of childbearing age, characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands. It is associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of endometriosis is often delayed in many patients. While laparoscopic investigation is required for a definitive diagnosis, physical examination combined with ultrasonography can provide reasonably accurate detection. Machine learning (ML) techniques have shown promise tools in medical imaging and diagnostics. However, there is a lack of sufficient ML studies focusing on Iranian endometriosis female patients. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different ML algorithms for endometriosis detection.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, our objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of different ML algorithms in classifying suspicious cases of endometriosis using ultrasonographic signs. Our data set consisted of 505 patients, among which 149 were confirmed cases of endometriosis. We divided the data set into training and test sets to train and evaluate the performance of the ML models. To ensure robust evaluation, we employed stratified 5-fold cross-validation and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as a measure of model performance.

Results: In the test set, a total of 37 out of 127 patients (29.1%) were diagnosed with endometriosis, while in the training set, 112 out of 378 patients (29.6%) were confirmed to have the condition. Sensitivities ranged from 59.5 to 75.7%, and specificities ranged from 71.7 to 83.3%. Notably, the SVM, Random Forest, Extra-Trees, and Gradient Boosting models exhibited the highest performance, with AUCs of 0.76.

Conclusion: Our study supports the use of ML models for the screening and diagnosis of endometriosis. The superior performance of the SVM, Random Forest, Extra-Trees, and Gradient Boosting models, as indicated by their high AUCs, suggests their potential as valuable tools in improving the accuracy of endometriosis detection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的子宫内膜异位症检测:伊朗女性患者群体的回顾性研究
背景:子宫内膜异位症是育龄妇女中的一种常见病,其特点是存在异位的子宫内膜腺体。它与盆腔疼痛和不孕症有关。遗憾的是,许多患者往往被延误了子宫内膜异位症的诊断。虽然明确诊断需要腹腔镜检查,但体格检查结合超声波检查可以提供相当准确的检测。机器学习(ML)技术在医学影像和诊断方面已显示出良好的前景。然而,目前还缺乏针对伊朗子宫内膜异位症女性患者的充分的机器学习研究。在这项研究中,我们旨在比较不同的 ML 算法对子宫内膜异位症检测的诊断准确性:在这项回顾性研究中,我们的目的是评估不同的 ML 算法在利用超声波征象对子宫内膜异位症可疑病例进行分类时的诊断准确性。我们的数据集由 505 例患者组成,其中 149 例确诊为子宫内膜异位症。我们将数据集分为训练集和测试集,以训练和评估 ML 模型的性能。为确保评估的稳健性,我们采用了分层 5 倍交叉验证,并计算了接收者工作特征曲线下的面积(AUC),作为衡量模型性能的指标:在测试集中,127 名患者中有 37 人(29.1%)被确诊为子宫内膜异位症,而在训练集中,378 名患者中有 112 人(29.6%)被确诊为子宫内膜异位症。灵敏度在 59.5% 到 75.7% 之间,特异度在 71.7% 到 83.3% 之间。值得注意的是,SVM、随机森林、Extra-Trees 和 Gradient Boosting 模型表现出最高的性能,AUC 为 0.76:我们的研究支持使用 ML 模型筛查和诊断子宫内膜异位症。SVM 模型、随机森林模型、Extra-Trees 模型和梯度提升模型的高 AUC 值显示了它们的卓越性能,这表明它们有望成为提高子宫内膜异位症检测准确率的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Fertility & Sterility is a quarterly English publication of Royan Institute . The aim of the journal is to disseminate information through publishing the most recent scientific research studies on Fertility and Sterility and other related topics. Int J Fertil Steril has been certified by Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance in 2007 and was accredited as a scientific and research journal by HBI (Health and Biomedical Information) Journal Accreditation Commission in 2008. Int J Fertil Steril is an Open Access journal.
期刊最新文献
A Combination of Artificial Intelligence with Genetic Algorithms on Static Time-Lapse Images Improves Consistency in Blastocyst Assessment, An Interpretable Tool to Automate Human Embryo Evaluation: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Nanocurcumin Decreases Nucleotide-Binding Oligomerization Domain-Like Receptor Family Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Complex Expressions in An Experimental Testicular Torsion Model. Non-Hormonal Therapy for Endometriosis Based on Angiogenesis, Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Potential Effects of Soy Isoflavones and Broccoli Extract on Oxidative Stress, Autophagy, and Apoptosis Gene Markers in Endometriosis. The Effect of Hepatitis B Virus Infection on Semen Quality of Infertile Men: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1