Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2429025
Xinyang Wang, Wan Nur Asyiqin Rasidi, Kumar Seluakumaran
{"title":"Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing.","authors":"Xinyang Wang, Wan Nur Asyiqin Rasidi, Kumar Seluakumaran","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2429025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This two-part pilot study investigated the feasibility of using a frequency selectivity measure (T<sub>FS</sub>) to develop a novel hearing screening test for cooperative adults. Study 1 determined the optimal masker level, while Study 2 assessed the reliability of a self-administered T<sub>FS</sub> test prototype performed at the selected masker level.</p><p><strong>Design and study sample: </strong>Study 1 (normal hearing, <i>n</i> = 20) examined masker-level effects on T<sub>FS</sub> using a manual threshold determination method from an earlier study. Study 2 (normal hearing, <i>n</i> = 21; hearing loss, <i>n</i> = 5) evaluated the reliability of a self-administered T<sub>FS</sub> test using a new automated threshold determination procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Moderate masker levels (30-40 dB SPL) were suitable for the T<sub>FS</sub> measurements, with 40 dB SPL being optimal. Lower level (20 dB SPL) led to floor effects, while higher level (50 dB SPL) broadened cochlear tuning and reduced T<sub>FS</sub> values. The self-administered test demonstrated ±9 dB limit of agreement, with intra-subject absolute mean differences of 1.8-2.7 dB across test frequencies, indicating greater variability compared to the manual method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The self-administered T<sub>FS</sub> test is a candidate for hearing screening, particularly for mild sensorineural hearing loss. However, further research is needed to reduce measurement variability and optimise testing for real-world use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2429025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This two-part pilot study investigated the feasibility of using a frequency selectivity measure (TFS) to develop a novel hearing screening test for cooperative adults. Study 1 determined the optimal masker level, while Study 2 assessed the reliability of a self-administered TFS test prototype performed at the selected masker level.

Design and study sample: Study 1 (normal hearing, n = 20) examined masker-level effects on TFS using a manual threshold determination method from an earlier study. Study 2 (normal hearing, n = 21; hearing loss, n = 5) evaluated the reliability of a self-administered TFS test using a new automated threshold determination procedure.

Results: Moderate masker levels (30-40 dB SPL) were suitable for the TFS measurements, with 40 dB SPL being optimal. Lower level (20 dB SPL) led to floor effects, while higher level (50 dB SPL) broadened cochlear tuning and reduced TFS values. The self-administered test demonstrated ±9 dB limit of agreement, with intra-subject absolute mean differences of 1.8-2.7 dB across test frequencies, indicating greater variability compared to the manual method.

Conclusions: The self-administered TFS test is a candidate for hearing screening, particularly for mild sensorineural hearing loss. However, further research is needed to reduce measurement variability and optimise testing for real-world use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为听力筛查潜在候选项目的简化频率选择性测量方法:自测测试随掩蔽水平和重复测试可靠性的变化。
研究目的本试验研究由两部分组成,旨在调查使用频率选择性测量法(TFS)为合作的成年人开发新型听力筛查测试的可行性。研究 1 确定了最佳掩蔽水平,而研究 2 则评估了在选定掩蔽水平下进行的自控 TFS 测试原型的可靠性:研究 1(听力正常,n = 20)使用早期研究中的手动阈值测定方法,检查了掩蔽器水平对 TFS 的影响。研究 2(听力正常,n = 21;听力损失,n = 5)使用新的自动阈值测定程序评估了自测 TFS 测试的可靠性:结果:中等掩蔽水平(30-40 dB SPL)适合 TFS 测量,其中 40 dB SPL 为最佳。较低的声压级(20 dB SPL)会导致底限效应,而较高的声压级(50 dB SPL)会扩大耳蜗调谐范围并降低 TFS 值。自控测试的一致性极限为±9 dB,各测试频率的受试者内绝对平均差为 1.8-2.7 dB,这表明与手动方法相比,自控测试的变异性更大:结论:自控 TFS 测试可用于听力筛查,尤其是轻度感音神经性听力损失的筛查。然而,还需要进一步的研究来减少测量的变异性,并优化测试以适应实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review. Evaluating psychometric properties of the Cantonese integrated Digit-in-Noise Test: perhaps the 2-digit sequence can also be used for hearing screening.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1