Characterization of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa carrying multiple carbapenemase genes-Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network, 2018-2022.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1128/jcm.01220-24
Sarah Sabour, Kristin R V Harrington, Ellen Martinson, Amelia S Bhatnagar, Jennifer Y Huang, Dustin Duffy, Katie Bantle, Joseph D Lutgring, Maria Karlsson, Allison C Brown
{"title":"Characterization of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> carrying multiple carbapenemase genes-Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network, 2018-2022.","authors":"Sarah Sabour, Kristin R V Harrington, Ellen Martinson, Amelia S Bhatnagar, Jennifer Y Huang, Dustin Duffy, Katie Bantle, Joseph D Lutgring, Maria Karlsson, Allison C Brown","doi":"10.1128/jcm.01220-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (CRPA) are significant public health threats, particularly when harboring carbapenemases. Literature describing the frequencies and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of isolates harboring multiple carbapenemase genes is limited. Using data collected from the Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network) in 2018-2022, we describe CRE and CRPA isolates that harbor multiple acquired carbapenemase genes. Clinical laboratories submitted CRE and CRPA isolates to AR Lab Network public health laboratories for additional characterization that included antimicrobial susceptibility testing and detection of five targeted carbapenemase genes. Isolates were classified as non-carbapenemase producing (non-CP) when negative for carbapenemase production and all targeted carbapenemase genes, or positive for a single-CP (SCP) or multiple-carbapenemase (MCP) targeted gene. Among 79,799 CREs tested, 27,599 (35%) were SCP and 611 (1%) were MCP. MCP-CRE most often carried <i>bla</i><sub>KPC</sub>/<i>bla</i><sub>NDM</sub> (<i>n</i> = 285, 47%). Both SCP-CRE and MCP-CRE were most commonly <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. <i>Enterobacter</i> spp. and <i>Escherichia coli</i> isolates harboring MCP were detected at slightly higher frequencies (18% and 15%; <i>n</i> = 109 and <i>n</i> = 88, respectively) than <i>Enterobacter</i> spp. and <i>Escherichia coli</i> isolates harboring SCP (13% and 13%; <i>n</i> = 3,653 and 3,471, respectively). The number of MCP-CRE detected increased from 54 of 5,105 (1%) in 2018 to 223 of 6,994 (3%) in 2022. Among 54,490 CRPA tested, 2% (<i>n</i> = 1,249) were SCP and 31 were MCP. MCP-CRPA most often carried <i>bla</i><sub>VIM</sub>/<i>bla</i><sub>IMP</sub> (<i>n</i> = 13, 42%). A higher proportion of MCP-CRE (97%, <i>n</i> = 330) isolates were categorized as resistant to meropenem, compared to SCP-CRE (79%; <i>n</i> = 11,227) and non-CP (13%; <i>n</i> = 2,683). Although MCP organisms represent a small proportion of total CP detected in the AR Lab Network, there is a need for continued monitoring and additional research.IMPORTANCECarbapenemase-producing organisms are of significant clinical and public health concerns, and rapid detection and containment of such threats are vital to preventing their spread. In this article, we used a collection of over 130,000 contemporary isolates to evaluate frequencies and phenotypic and genotypic properties of CRE and CRPA isolates harboring multiple carbapenemase genes across the United States, from 2018 to 2022. Of note, 95% and 100% of CRE and CRPA isolates co-harbored at least one metallo-β-lactamase gene, respectively, indicating a high proportion of isolates originating from patients with difficult-to-treat infections. Both clinical and public health professionals across the nation can use these data and key findings to better understand the molecular landscape of these isolates. Timely detection and control of these organisms are essential to combating the spread of antibiotic resistance and ensuring the availability of effective treatment options for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15511,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"e0122024"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01220-24","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) are significant public health threats, particularly when harboring carbapenemases. Literature describing the frequencies and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of isolates harboring multiple carbapenemase genes is limited. Using data collected from the Antimicrobial Resistance Laboratory Network (AR Lab Network) in 2018-2022, we describe CRE and CRPA isolates that harbor multiple acquired carbapenemase genes. Clinical laboratories submitted CRE and CRPA isolates to AR Lab Network public health laboratories for additional characterization that included antimicrobial susceptibility testing and detection of five targeted carbapenemase genes. Isolates were classified as non-carbapenemase producing (non-CP) when negative for carbapenemase production and all targeted carbapenemase genes, or positive for a single-CP (SCP) or multiple-carbapenemase (MCP) targeted gene. Among 79,799 CREs tested, 27,599 (35%) were SCP and 611 (1%) were MCP. MCP-CRE most often carried blaKPC/blaNDM (n = 285, 47%). Both SCP-CRE and MCP-CRE were most commonly Klebsiella spp. Enterobacter spp. and Escherichia coli isolates harboring MCP were detected at slightly higher frequencies (18% and 15%; n = 109 and n = 88, respectively) than Enterobacter spp. and Escherichia coli isolates harboring SCP (13% and 13%; n = 3,653 and 3,471, respectively). The number of MCP-CRE detected increased from 54 of 5,105 (1%) in 2018 to 223 of 6,994 (3%) in 2022. Among 54,490 CRPA tested, 2% (n = 1,249) were SCP and 31 were MCP. MCP-CRPA most often carried blaVIM/blaIMP (n = 13, 42%). A higher proportion of MCP-CRE (97%, n = 330) isolates were categorized as resistant to meropenem, compared to SCP-CRE (79%; n = 11,227) and non-CP (13%; n = 2,683). Although MCP organisms represent a small proportion of total CP detected in the AR Lab Network, there is a need for continued monitoring and additional research.IMPORTANCECarbapenemase-producing organisms are of significant clinical and public health concerns, and rapid detection and containment of such threats are vital to preventing their spread. In this article, we used a collection of over 130,000 contemporary isolates to evaluate frequencies and phenotypic and genotypic properties of CRE and CRPA isolates harboring multiple carbapenemase genes across the United States, from 2018 to 2022. Of note, 95% and 100% of CRE and CRPA isolates co-harbored at least one metallo-β-lactamase gene, respectively, indicating a high proportion of isolates originating from patients with difficult-to-treat infections. Both clinical and public health professionals across the nation can use these data and key findings to better understand the molecular landscape of these isolates. Timely detection and control of these organisms are essential to combating the spread of antibiotic resistance and ensuring the availability of effective treatment options for patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
携带多种碳青霉烯酶基因的耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌的特征--抗菌药物耐药性实验室网络,2018-2022。
耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)和耐碳青霉烯类铜绿假单胞菌(CRPA)对公共卫生构成重大威胁,尤其是当它们携带碳青霉烯酶时。描述分离物携带多种碳青霉烯酶基因的频率、表型和基因型特征的文献十分有限。利用 2018-2022 年从抗菌药物耐药性实验室网络(AR Lab Network)收集的数据,我们描述了携带多种获得性碳青霉烯酶基因的 CRE 和 CRPA 分离物。临床实验室将 CRE 和 CRPA 分离物提交给 AR 实验室网络公共卫生实验室进行额外的特征描述,包括抗菌药敏感性测试和五种目标碳青霉烯酶基因的检测。如果碳青霉烯酶生成和所有目标碳青霉烯酶基因检测结果均为阴性,则分离物被归类为不产碳青霉烯酶(non-CP);如果单碳青霉烯酶(SCP)或多碳青霉烯酶(MCP)目标基因检测结果为阳性,则分离物被归类为产碳青霉烯酶(non-CP)。在检测的 79799 个 CRE 中,27599 个(35%)为 SCP,611 个(1%)为 MCP。MCP-CRE 最常携带 blaKPC/blaNDM(n = 285,47%)。检出携带 MCP 的肠杆菌属和大肠埃希菌分离物的频率(分别为 18% 和 15%; n = 109 和 n = 88)略高于携带 SCP 的肠杆菌属和大肠埃希菌分离物(分别为 13% 和 13%; n = 3,653 和 3,471 )。检测到的 MCP-CRE 数量从 2018 年 5 105 个中的 54 个(1%)增加到 2022 年 6 994 个中的 223 个(3%)。在检测的 54 490 个 CRPA 中,2%(n = 1 249)为 SCP,31 个为 MCP。MCP-CRPA 最常携带 blaVIM/blaIMP(n = 13,42%)。与 SCP-CRE(79%;n = 11,227 例)和非 MCP(13%;n = 2,683 例)相比,更高比例的 MCP-CRE 分离物(97%,n = 330 例)被归类为对美罗培南耐药。虽然 MCP 微生物在 AR 实验室网络检测到的 CP 总量中只占一小部分,但仍需继续监测和开展更多研究。在这篇文章中,我们利用收集到的超过 13 万个当代分离株,评估了 2018 年至 2022 年全美携带多种碳青霉烯酶基因的 CRE 和 CRPA 分离株的频率、表型和基因型特性。值得注意的是,分别有95%和100%的CRE和CRPA分离物至少同时携带一种金属-β-内酰胺酶基因,这表明有很高比例的分离物来源于难以治疗的感染患者。全国的临床和公共卫生专业人员都可以利用这些数据和重要发现来更好地了解这些分离物的分子状况。及时发现和控制这些微生物对于遏制抗生素耐药性的传播和确保为患者提供有效的治疗方案至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Journal of Clinical Microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
347
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Microbiology® disseminates the latest research concerning the laboratory diagnosis of human and animal infections, along with the laboratory's role in epidemiology and the management of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Erratum for Ganaie et al., "Discovery and Characterization of Pneumococcal Serogroup 36 Capsule Subtypes, Serotypes 36A and 36B". Multicenter evaluation of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy as a first-line typing tool for carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in clinical settings. Yield of solid AFB culture in addition to automated liquid culture for diagnosis of mycobacterial infections. Emergence of terbinafine-resistant Trichophyton indotineae in Ontario, Canada, 2014-2023. Pleural space infection microbiology as assessed using a clinical sequencing-based assay: Fusobacterium nucleatum group, Streptococcus intermedius, and other oral normal microbiota are the most common bacteria identified in community-acquired pleural space infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1