Biomechanical changes in the lumbar and hip joint after curved periacetabular osteotomy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05250-5
Yongzhen Qu, Hao Tang, Ning Lu, Wenjin Li, Ping Xu, Taoyong Zhou
{"title":"Biomechanical changes in the lumbar and hip joint after curved periacetabular osteotomy.","authors":"Yongzhen Qu, Hao Tang, Ning Lu, Wenjin Li, Ping Xu, Taoyong Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05250-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The alignment of the spine and pelvis significantly impacts overall body balance; therefore, alterations in hip and lumbar spine biomechanics following curved acetabular osteotomy (CPO) can help surgeons optimize acetabular correction. To achieve this goal, we conducted patient-specific finite element analyses to compare hip and lumbar disc contact pressure (CP) between patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and healthy individuals. Additionally, we examined the influence of CPO on the CP of both the hip and lumbar discs in patients with DDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted finite element analyses of the hip and lumbar spine before and after CPO and compared them with those of a healthy human model. Subsequently, we simulated CPO on the preoperative model. Nonlinear contact analysis was employed to calculate the CP of the acetabular cartilage and lumbar discs during a single-leg stance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum and average acetabular CP in patients with DDH were 5.4 MPa and 4.5 MPa, respectively. The average CP for the five lumbar discs were 3 MPa, 2.5 MPa, 2 MPa, 3.5 MPa, and 4.4 MPa. In contrast, the maximum and average acetabular CP in normal subjects were 3.7 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, and the average CP of their lumbar discs were 1 MPa, 2 MPA, 1.88 MPa, 2.1 MPa, and 2.1 MPa, respectively. After CPO, the maximum and average CP of the hip decreased, as did the average CP of the lumbar discs. The maximum and average compressive stress of the acetabulum decreased to 3.79 MPa and 2.3 MPa, respectively, and the average compressive stress of the five intervertebral discs decreased to 1.96 MPa, 0.79 MPa, 0.78 MPa, 1.13 MPa, and 3.14 MPa, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our finite element analysis indicated that CPO effectively normalizes hip contact pressure while reducing lumbar disc contact pressure. However, further investigation is required to elucidate the specific biomechanical mechanisms underlying these changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"770"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05250-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The alignment of the spine and pelvis significantly impacts overall body balance; therefore, alterations in hip and lumbar spine biomechanics following curved acetabular osteotomy (CPO) can help surgeons optimize acetabular correction. To achieve this goal, we conducted patient-specific finite element analyses to compare hip and lumbar disc contact pressure (CP) between patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and healthy individuals. Additionally, we examined the influence of CPO on the CP of both the hip and lumbar discs in patients with DDH.

Methods: We conducted finite element analyses of the hip and lumbar spine before and after CPO and compared them with those of a healthy human model. Subsequently, we simulated CPO on the preoperative model. Nonlinear contact analysis was employed to calculate the CP of the acetabular cartilage and lumbar discs during a single-leg stance.

Results: The maximum and average acetabular CP in patients with DDH were 5.4 MPa and 4.5 MPa, respectively. The average CP for the five lumbar discs were 3 MPa, 2.5 MPa, 2 MPa, 3.5 MPa, and 4.4 MPa. In contrast, the maximum and average acetabular CP in normal subjects were 3.7 MPa and 2.1 MPa, respectively, and the average CP of their lumbar discs were 1 MPa, 2 MPA, 1.88 MPa, 2.1 MPa, and 2.1 MPa, respectively. After CPO, the maximum and average CP of the hip decreased, as did the average CP of the lumbar discs. The maximum and average compressive stress of the acetabulum decreased to 3.79 MPa and 2.3 MPa, respectively, and the average compressive stress of the five intervertebral discs decreased to 1.96 MPa, 0.79 MPa, 0.78 MPa, 1.13 MPa, and 3.14 MPa, respectively.

Conclusion: Our finite element analysis indicated that CPO effectively normalizes hip contact pressure while reducing lumbar disc contact pressure. However, further investigation is required to elucidate the specific biomechanical mechanisms underlying these changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
弯曲髋臼周围截骨术后腰椎和髋关节的生物力学变化。
背景:脊柱和骨盆的排列对身体的整体平衡有重大影响;因此,髋臼弯曲截骨术(CPO)后髋关节和腰椎生物力学的改变可帮助外科医生优化髋臼矫正。为了实现这一目标,我们进行了患者特异性有限元分析,以比较髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者和健康人的髋关节和腰椎间盘接触压力(CP)。此外,我们还研究了 CPO 对 DDH 患者髋关节和腰椎间盘 CP 的影响:我们对 CPO 前后的髋关节和腰椎进行了有限元分析,并与健康人体模型进行了比较。随后,我们在术前模型上模拟了 CPO。采用非线性接触分析法计算单腿站立时髋臼软骨和腰椎间盘的CP:结果:DDH 患者的最大和平均髋臼 CP 分别为 5.4 兆帕和 4.5 兆帕。五个腰椎间盘的平均CP分别为3兆帕、2.5兆帕、2兆帕、3.5兆帕和4.4兆帕。相比之下,正常受试者的最大和平均髋臼CP分别为3.7 MPa和2.1 MPa,其腰椎间盘的平均CP分别为1 MPa、2 MPA、1.88 MPa、2.1 MPa和2.1 MPa。CPO 后,髋关节的最大和平均 CP 值下降,腰椎间盘的平均 CP 值也下降。髋臼的最大和平均压应力分别降至 3.79 兆帕和 2.3 兆帕,五个椎间盘的平均压应力分别降至 1.96 兆帕、0.79 兆帕、0.78 兆帕、1.13 兆帕和 3.14 兆帕:我们的有限元分析表明,CPO 有效地使髋关节接触压力正常化,同时降低了腰椎间盘接触压力。结论:我们的有限元分析表明,CPO 能有效地使髋关节接触压力恢复正常,同时降低腰椎间盘接触压力。然而,要阐明这些变化背后的具体生物力学机制,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Effect of the orthogeriatric co-management on older hip fracture patients with multimorbidity: a post-hoc exploratory subgroup analysis of a non-randomised controlled trial. Pilot study on the in-vitro effect of radiation therapy on bending stiffness of intramedullary photodynamic implants. Comparison of three sacral screw internal fixation techniques in the treatment of L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis: a retrospective observational study. Correction: CRISPR activation identifies a novel miR-2861 binding site that facilitates the osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1