Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Arterial Hypertension: 10-Year Real-World Follow-Up Data

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/jch.14931
Sofie Brouwers, Giulia Botti, Matthias Verbesselt, Lucio Addeo, Marta Belmonte, Kostas Bermpeis, Dario Tino Bertolone, Chiara Valeriano, Michele Mattia Viscusi, Eric Wyffels
{"title":"Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Arterial Hypertension: 10-Year Real-World Follow-Up Data","authors":"Sofie Brouwers,&nbsp;Giulia Botti,&nbsp;Matthias Verbesselt,&nbsp;Lucio Addeo,&nbsp;Marta Belmonte,&nbsp;Kostas Bermpeis,&nbsp;Dario Tino Bertolone,&nbsp;Chiara Valeriano,&nbsp;Michele Mattia Viscusi,&nbsp;Eric Wyffels","doi":"10.1111/jch.14931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This analysis of real-world data examines the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of renal denervation in hypertensive patients for up to 10 years. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent renal denervation (RDN) (single operator) for uncontrolled resistant hypertension. Efficacy was defined as the interindividual change of office (OBPM) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) at 1, 6, 12 months, 2–4 and 5–10 years after RDN. Medication changes, renal function, and device generation disparities were analyzed. Of these patients, 42 received RDN with a first-generation device, while 23 underwent the procedure with a second-generation device. Baseline demographics included a predominantly male cohort (57.6%) with an average age of 60.3 years. The mean number of medications at baseline was 4.3. OBPM at baseline was 169.0/87.4 mmHg, and ABPM at baseline was 153.4/88.4 mmHg. Post-procedure, significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) were observed in both OBPM and ABPM at 1 month (OBPM 147.9/82.8 mmHg; ABPM 141.3/83.0 mmHg [SBP, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]), sustained up to 10 years (OBPM 153.1/84.3 mmHg; ABPM 138/80.1 mmHg [SBP, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001]). After 1 year around half of patients had a controlled OBPM and 24 h ABPM &lt; 135/85 mmHg, which was associated with a higher number of ablation spots (31.5±14.8 vs. 15.5 ± 6.5, <i>p</i> = 0.002) and occurred more often when treated with a second-generation device (2 [12.5%] vs. 7 [77.8%], <i>p</i> = 0.002). Renal function displayed a minor physiological decline over 5–10 years. No major complication occurred. Renal denervation demonstrated sustained significant reductions in systolic OBPM and ABPM up to 10 years post-procedure. Controlled blood pressure at 1 year was associated with a higher number of mean ablated spots and the use of a second-generation device. The procedure exhibited a favorable safety profile, indicating its viability in managing hypertension without significant renal function compromise.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"26 12","pages":"1521-1527"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jch.14931","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14931","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This analysis of real-world data examines the efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of renal denervation in hypertensive patients for up to 10 years. Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent renal denervation (RDN) (single operator) for uncontrolled resistant hypertension. Efficacy was defined as the interindividual change of office (OBPM) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) at 1, 6, 12 months, 2–4 and 5–10 years after RDN. Medication changes, renal function, and device generation disparities were analyzed. Of these patients, 42 received RDN with a first-generation device, while 23 underwent the procedure with a second-generation device. Baseline demographics included a predominantly male cohort (57.6%) with an average age of 60.3 years. The mean number of medications at baseline was 4.3. OBPM at baseline was 169.0/87.4 mmHg, and ABPM at baseline was 153.4/88.4 mmHg. Post-procedure, significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (SBP) were observed in both OBPM and ABPM at 1 month (OBPM 147.9/82.8 mmHg; ABPM 141.3/83.0 mmHg [SBP, p < 0.001]), sustained up to 10 years (OBPM 153.1/84.3 mmHg; ABPM 138/80.1 mmHg [SBP, p < 0.001]). After 1 year around half of patients had a controlled OBPM and 24 h ABPM < 135/85 mmHg, which was associated with a higher number of ablation spots (31.5±14.8 vs. 15.5 ± 6.5, p = 0.002) and occurred more often when treated with a second-generation device (2 [12.5%] vs. 7 [77.8%], p = 0.002). Renal function displayed a minor physiological decline over 5–10 years. No major complication occurred. Renal denervation demonstrated sustained significant reductions in systolic OBPM and ABPM up to 10 years post-procedure. Controlled blood pressure at 1 year was associated with a higher number of mean ablated spots and the use of a second-generation device. The procedure exhibited a favorable safety profile, indicating its viability in managing hypertension without significant renal function compromise.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于导管的肾脏去神经治疗难治性动脉高血压:10 年真实世界随访数据。
本研究对真实世界的数据进行了分析,探讨了肾脏神经支配对高血压患者长达 10 年的疗效、安全性和长期疗效。65 名连续接受肾脏去神经支配(RDN)治疗的患者(单人操作)均患有无法控制的抵抗性高血压。疗效定义为 RDN 后 1、6、12 个月、2-4 年和 5-10 年的诊室血压 (OBPM) 和非卧床血压监测 (ABPM) 的个体间变化。对用药变化、肾功能和设备生成差异进行了分析。在这些患者中,42 人使用第一代设备进行了 RDN,23 人使用第二代设备进行了手术。基线人口统计学特征包括男性居多(57.6%),平均年龄为 60.3 岁。基线时的平均服药次数为 4.3 次。基线时的 OBPM 为 169.0/87.4 mmHg,基线时的 ABPM 为 153.4/88.4 mmHg。手术后 1 个月,OBPM 和 ABPM 的收缩压 (SBP) 均有明显降低(OBPM 为 147.9/82.8 mmHg;ABPM 为 141.3/83.0 mmHg [SBP, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Hypertension
Journal of Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.
期刊最新文献
Association of Triglyceride-Glucose Index, Triglyceride to High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Ratio, and Related Parameters With Prehypertension and Hypertension. May Measurement Month 2020: An Analysis of Blood Pressure Screening Results From China. Causal Associations Between the Gut Microbiota and Hypertension-Related Traits Through Mendelian Randomization: A Cross-Sectional Cohort Study. Etiology and Medication of Hospitalized Children With Hypertension: A Retrospective Study. Association of Questionnaire-Assessed Fall Risk With Uncontrolled Blood Pressure and Therapeutic Inertia Among Older Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1