Multiple social factors are associated with wellbeing when accounting for shared genetic and environmental confounding.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Quality of Life Research Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03832-8
Ludvig Daae Bjørndal, Ragnhild Bang Nes, Ziada Ayorech, Olav Vassend, Espen Røysamb
{"title":"Multiple social factors are associated with wellbeing when accounting for shared genetic and environmental confounding.","authors":"Ludvig Daae Bjørndal, Ragnhild Bang Nes, Ziada Ayorech, Olav Vassend, Espen Røysamb","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03832-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social factors are associated with mental health and wellbeing. However, few studies have examined genetic and environmental influences on social factors themselves, limiting current understanding of influences on aspects of the social environment. Most studies which have identified links between social factors and mental health are also limited by the possible influence of unmeasured genetic and environmental confounding. In this study, we investigated the genetic and environmental underpinnings of multiple social factors (relationship satisfaction, loneliness, attachment, trust, relationship disruptions), and their associations with life satisfaction measured concurrently and six years later, after accounting for shared genetic and environmental confounding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from a population-based sample of adult twins (N = 1987) and two measurement timepoints were used for the primary analyses. We used multivariate Cholesky models to estimate genetic and environmental influences across five social factors. Subsequently, we conducted co-twin control analyses to examine associations between social factors and wellbeing after controlling for shared genetic and environmental confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Heritability estimates for the social factors ranged from 24 to 42%. Genetic correlations across social factors were substantial, indicative of considerable genetic overlap. Associations between wellbeing and relationship satisfaction, loneliness, anxious and avoidant attachment, trust, and disruptions in relationships in the past year were attenuated in co-twin control analyses but remained statistically significant. Relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and attachment avoidance were also associated with wellbeing measured six years later in estimates which controlled for shared genetic and environmental confounding.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide evidence that multiple social factors are associated with wellbeing after accounting for potential confounding by shared genetic and/or environmental factors. These findings highlight the importance of multiple aspects of the social environment for wellbeing in older adulthood. Future studies should examine the directionality in associations between social factors and mental health and assess these relationships beyond older adulthood.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03832-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Social factors are associated with mental health and wellbeing. However, few studies have examined genetic and environmental influences on social factors themselves, limiting current understanding of influences on aspects of the social environment. Most studies which have identified links between social factors and mental health are also limited by the possible influence of unmeasured genetic and environmental confounding. In this study, we investigated the genetic and environmental underpinnings of multiple social factors (relationship satisfaction, loneliness, attachment, trust, relationship disruptions), and their associations with life satisfaction measured concurrently and six years later, after accounting for shared genetic and environmental confounding.

Methods: Data from a population-based sample of adult twins (N = 1987) and two measurement timepoints were used for the primary analyses. We used multivariate Cholesky models to estimate genetic and environmental influences across five social factors. Subsequently, we conducted co-twin control analyses to examine associations between social factors and wellbeing after controlling for shared genetic and environmental confounding.

Results: Heritability estimates for the social factors ranged from 24 to 42%. Genetic correlations across social factors were substantial, indicative of considerable genetic overlap. Associations between wellbeing and relationship satisfaction, loneliness, anxious and avoidant attachment, trust, and disruptions in relationships in the past year were attenuated in co-twin control analyses but remained statistically significant. Relationship satisfaction, loneliness, and attachment avoidance were also associated with wellbeing measured six years later in estimates which controlled for shared genetic and environmental confounding.

Conclusion: Our findings provide evidence that multiple social factors are associated with wellbeing after accounting for potential confounding by shared genetic and/or environmental factors. These findings highlight the importance of multiple aspects of the social environment for wellbeing in older adulthood. Future studies should examine the directionality in associations between social factors and mental health and assess these relationships beyond older adulthood.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在考虑到共同的遗传和环境干扰因素的情况下,多种社会因素与福祉相关。
目的:社会因素与心理健康和幸福感有关。然而,很少有研究对遗传和环境对社会因素本身的影响进行研究,这限制了目前对社会环境各方面影响的了解。大多数确定了社会因素与心理健康之间联系的研究也受到了未测量的遗传和环境混杂因素可能造成的影响的限制。在这项研究中,我们调查了多种社会因素(关系满意度、孤独感、依恋、信任、关系中断)的遗传和环境基础,以及它们与同时和六年后测量的生活满意度之间的关系,并考虑了共同的遗传和环境混杂因素:主要分析采用了基于人口的成年双胞胎样本数据(N = 1987)和两个测量时间点的数据。我们使用多变量 Cholesky 模型来估计五个社会因素的遗传和环境影响。随后,我们进行了同卵双生子对照分析,在控制了共同的遗传和环境混杂因素后,研究了社会因素与幸福之间的关联:社会因素的遗传率估计值从 24% 到 42% 不等。各社会因素之间的遗传相关性很大,表明存在相当大的遗传重叠。在同卵双生子对照分析中,幸福感与人际关系满意度、孤独感、焦虑型和回避型依恋、信任以及过去一年人际关系中断之间的相关性有所减弱,但在统计学上仍然显著。在控制共同遗传和环境干扰的估计中,关系满意度、孤独感和依恋回避也与六年后测量的幸福感相关:我们的研究结果证明,在考虑了共同遗传和/或环境因素的潜在干扰后,多种社会因素与幸福感相关。这些发现强调了社会环境的多个方面对老年期幸福感的重要性。未来的研究应考察社会因素与心理健康之间的关联的方向性,并对这些关系进行超越老年期的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
期刊最新文献
Myelofibrosis symptom assessment form total symptom score version 4.0: measurement properties from the MOMENTUM phase 3 study. Patient-reported health status in TTR amyloidosis: which yardstick to use? A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life. Depressive and anxiety symptoms in current, previous, and no history of ME/CFS: NHIS 2022 analysis. Factors that impact the implementation of patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care for peripheral artery disease from the patient perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1