{"title":"Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Review.","authors":"Abhay Bhave, Harjit Dumra, Sandeep Bansal","doi":"10.59556/japi.72.0737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortalityespecially among hospitalized patients. Although the exact epidemiology of PE is not known in India, several studies have shown that it is missed and mismanaged not infrequently, leading to significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Indian consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of acute PE has been previously published. Recent findings from studies including data available from Indian studies have expanded our knowledge with respect to the optimal diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of patients with PE and have been integrated into this review article. Acute PE patients should be stratified according to early mortality risk. Clinical measures, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction markers, and myocardial injury should be used to determine risk stratification. The clinical prediction criteria [pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and Hestia criteria] should be routinely used in emergency departments. Investigations, such as D-dimer, electrocardiogram (ECG), chest X-ray, routine labs, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide/brain natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP/BNP), troponin I or troponin T, heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), echocardiography, lower limb compression ultrasonography (CUS), computed tomographic-pulmonary angiography (CTPA), ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (V/Q scan), and pulmonary angiography should be appropriately selected in suspected cases of PE as per risk stratification. The main treatment in medical management of acute PE comprises anticoagulants and thrombolytics. According to current guidelines, oral anticoagulants such as warfarin are recommended to be started at the time of diagnosis together with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or fondaparinux (all grade IA). Owing to their predictable bioavailability and pharmacokinetics, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) can be given at fixed doses without routine laboratory monitoring. Recurrence is not uncommon on cessation of therapy, and hence long-term anticoagulation may be required in selected cases. Strong positive evidence is available for the use of thrombolytics in the management of acute PE.</p>","PeriodicalId":22693,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","volume":"72 11","pages":"80-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an important cause of morbidity and mortalityespecially among hospitalized patients. Although the exact epidemiology of PE is not known in India, several studies have shown that it is missed and mismanaged not infrequently, leading to significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Indian consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of acute PE has been previously published. Recent findings from studies including data available from Indian studies have expanded our knowledge with respect to the optimal diagnosis, assessment, and treatment of patients with PE and have been integrated into this review article. Acute PE patients should be stratified according to early mortality risk. Clinical measures, right ventricular (RV) dysfunction markers, and myocardial injury should be used to determine risk stratification. The clinical prediction criteria [pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI) and Hestia criteria] should be routinely used in emergency departments. Investigations, such as D-dimer, electrocardiogram (ECG), chest X-ray, routine labs, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide/brain natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP/BNP), troponin I or troponin T, heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), echocardiography, lower limb compression ultrasonography (CUS), computed tomographic-pulmonary angiography (CTPA), ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy (V/Q scan), and pulmonary angiography should be appropriately selected in suspected cases of PE as per risk stratification. The main treatment in medical management of acute PE comprises anticoagulants and thrombolytics. According to current guidelines, oral anticoagulants such as warfarin are recommended to be started at the time of diagnosis together with unfractionated heparin (UFH), low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), or fondaparinux (all grade IA). Owing to their predictable bioavailability and pharmacokinetics, novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) can be given at fixed doses without routine laboratory monitoring. Recurrence is not uncommon on cessation of therapy, and hence long-term anticoagulation may be required in selected cases. Strong positive evidence is available for the use of thrombolytics in the management of acute PE.
肺栓塞(PE)是导致发病和死亡的一个重要原因,尤其是在住院病人中。虽然印度尚不清楚肺栓塞的确切流行病学,但多项研究表明,肺栓塞被漏诊和误治的情况屡见不鲜,从而导致了严重的心血管疾病发病率和死亡率。印度此前已就急性 PE 的诊断和治疗达成共识。包括印度研究数据在内的最新研究结果扩展了我们对 PE 患者最佳诊断、评估和治疗的认识,并已纳入本综述文章。应根据早期死亡风险对急性 PE 患者进行分层。临床指标、右心室(RV)功能障碍指标和心肌损伤应用于确定风险分层。急诊科应常规使用临床预测标准[肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI)和Hestia标准]。检查项目包括 D-二聚体、心电图(ECG)、胸部 X 光片、常规实验室检查、N 端前 B 型钠尿肽/脑钠尿肽(NT-ProBNP/BNP)、肌钙蛋白 I 或肌钙蛋白 T、心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)、超声心动图、对于 PE 疑似病例,应根据风险分层适当选择下肢加压超声波检查(CUS)、计算机断层扫描-肺血管造影术(CTPA)、通气-灌注闪烁扫描(V/Q 扫描)和肺血管造影术。急性 PE 的内科治疗主要包括抗凝药物和溶栓药物。根据目前的指南,建议在确诊时开始使用华法林等口服抗凝剂,以及非分叶肝素(UFH)、低分子量肝素(LMWH)或磺达肝癸(均为IA级)。新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs)的生物利用度和药代动力学可预测,因此可按固定剂量服用,无需进行常规实验室监测。停止治疗后复发的情况并不少见,因此在特定病例中可能需要长期抗凝治疗。在急性 PE 的治疗中使用溶栓药物有很强的正面证据。