Long-term outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12409
James Lucocq, Thomas Trinder, Elli Symeonidou, Katy Homyer, Hassan Baig, Pradeep Patil, Girivasan Muthukumarasamy
{"title":"Long-term outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer.","authors":"James Lucocq, Thomas Trinder, Elli Symeonidou, Katy Homyer, Hassan Baig, Pradeep Patil, Girivasan Muthukumarasamy","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The relative outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer compared to symptomatic cases are unknown. In this study, short and long-term outcomes after right-sided colectomy in screen-detected colon cancer are compared with symptomatic cases, both emergency and elective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational cohort study of patients, including both screen-detected and symptomatic patients (elective and emergency resections), undergoing right-sided colectomy for colon cancer (2010-2020) in a tertiary care unit was conducted. Each patient was followed up for long-term recurrence and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 909 patients (median age, 70; IQR, 58-82; male, 52%) were included (151 patients (16.6%) screen-detected; 598 (65.8%) elective and 160 (17.6%) emergency). Screen-detected patients were more likely to have T1 or T2 lesions compared to elective and emergency groups (T1: 14.6% vs. 3.8% vs. 0.6% p < 0.001; T2: 16.6% vs. 8.9% vs. 3.1% p < 0.001), but were less likely to have T3 or T4 lesions (p < 0.001), respectively. Rates of N0 were higher in the screen-detected group (68.9% vs. 63.5% vs. 41.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). 98% of the screen-detected group achieved R0 resection compared to 93.3% of elective and 79.4% of emergency patients (p < 0.001). At 5-years following resection, overall survival for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups were 85.4%, 75.4%, and 53.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Recurrence at 5-year post-resection were 8%, 15.1%, and 22.5% for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups, respectively (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>When considering right-sided colon cancer alone, screen-detected cancers have a lower long-term recurrence rate, lower rates of postoperative complication, and superior survival compared to symptomatic groups following resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12409","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The relative outcomes following the resection of screen-detected right-sided colon cancer compared to symptomatic cases are unknown. In this study, short and long-term outcomes after right-sided colectomy in screen-detected colon cancer are compared with symptomatic cases, both emergency and elective.

Methods: A prospective observational cohort study of patients, including both screen-detected and symptomatic patients (elective and emergency resections), undergoing right-sided colectomy for colon cancer (2010-2020) in a tertiary care unit was conducted. Each patient was followed up for long-term recurrence and survival.

Results: A total of 909 patients (median age, 70; IQR, 58-82; male, 52%) were included (151 patients (16.6%) screen-detected; 598 (65.8%) elective and 160 (17.6%) emergency). Screen-detected patients were more likely to have T1 or T2 lesions compared to elective and emergency groups (T1: 14.6% vs. 3.8% vs. 0.6% p < 0.001; T2: 16.6% vs. 8.9% vs. 3.1% p < 0.001), but were less likely to have T3 or T4 lesions (p < 0.001), respectively. Rates of N0 were higher in the screen-detected group (68.9% vs. 63.5% vs. 41.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). 98% of the screen-detected group achieved R0 resection compared to 93.3% of elective and 79.4% of emergency patients (p < 0.001). At 5-years following resection, overall survival for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups were 85.4%, 75.4%, and 53.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). Recurrence at 5-year post-resection were 8%, 15.1%, and 22.5% for the screen-detected, elective, and emergency groups, respectively (p < 0.001).

Discussion: When considering right-sided colon cancer alone, screen-detected cancers have a lower long-term recurrence rate, lower rates of postoperative complication, and superior survival compared to symptomatic groups following resection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
筛查发现的右侧结肠癌切除术后的长期疗效。
背景:与无症状病例相比,筛查出的右侧结肠癌切除术后的相对疗效尚不清楚。本研究将筛查出的结肠癌右侧结肠切除术后的短期和长期疗效与无症状病例(包括急诊和择期病例)进行了比较:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究的对象是在一家三级医院接受结肠癌右侧结肠切除术的患者,包括筛查出的患者和有症状的患者(择期和急诊切除)(2010-2020 年)。对每位患者的长期复发率和生存率进行了随访:共纳入 909 名患者(中位年龄 70 岁;IQR 58-82;男性 52%)(其中 151 名患者(16.6%)为筛查出的患者;598 名患者(65.8%)为选择性患者,160 名患者(17.6%)为急诊患者)。与择期组和急诊组相比,筛查出的患者更有可能出现 T1 或 T2 病变(T1:14.6% 对 3.8% 对 0.6% p 讨论):如果仅考虑右侧结肠癌,与无症状组相比,筛查出的癌症长期复发率较低,术后并发症发生率较低,切除后的生存率也较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Association of obesity and thyroidectomy-specific perioperative outcomes. Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy according to the trimester of pregnancy: A nationwide observational study. Longitudinal assessment of disparities in pancreatic cancer care: A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database. Outcomes of a delirium prevention program after major abdominal emergency surgery: An interventional study. Validation of the twenty-four-hour threshold for bladder repair: Impact on infection rates using the National Trauma Data Bank. A letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1