Fanni Sánta, Antranik Dabaghian, Boglárka Pósfai, Béla Vasas, László Kaizer, Alex Jenei, Bálint Scheich, Vanda Téglási, Zoltán Sápi, Krisztina Bíró, Anikó Maráz, Mavrogenis Stelios, Henriett Butz, Petr Martínek, Kristýna Pivovarčíková, Zsombor Melegh, Mahmut Akgul, Levente Kuthi
{"title":"Morphological diversity in SDH-deficient renal carcinomas: a three-case exploration of variant features and dedifferentiation.","authors":"Fanni Sánta, Antranik Dabaghian, Boglárka Pósfai, Béla Vasas, László Kaizer, Alex Jenei, Bálint Scheich, Vanda Téglási, Zoltán Sápi, Krisztina Bíró, Anikó Maráz, Mavrogenis Stelios, Henriett Butz, Petr Martínek, Kristýna Pivovarčíková, Zsombor Melegh, Mahmut Akgul, Levente Kuthi","doi":"10.1007/s00428-024-03978-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare subtype of renal neoplasm predominantly affecting younger individuals. It is characterized by germline mutations in SDHx genes, particularly type B. Histologically, SDH-deficient RCC features eosinophilic cytoplasmic cells forming solid nests or microcysts, sometimes entrapping normal tubules. We present three SDH-deficient RCC cases with overlapping morphological features with fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC and TFEB-rearranged RCC, an appearance that has not been previously described. All tumors lacked SDHB expression and harbored pathogenic SDHB mutations, with the germline nature confirmed in two cases. Metastasis developed in two patients. Our case set highlights the diagnostic challenges of molecularly defined renal tumors and expands the morphological spectrum of SDH-deficient RCC with unusual histological features. Clinically, these tumors appear to be aggressive.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-024-03978-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare subtype of renal neoplasm predominantly affecting younger individuals. It is characterized by germline mutations in SDHx genes, particularly type B. Histologically, SDH-deficient RCC features eosinophilic cytoplasmic cells forming solid nests or microcysts, sometimes entrapping normal tubules. We present three SDH-deficient RCC cases with overlapping morphological features with fumarate hydratase-deficient RCC and TFEB-rearranged RCC, an appearance that has not been previously described. All tumors lacked SDHB expression and harbored pathogenic SDHB mutations, with the germline nature confirmed in two cases. Metastasis developed in two patients. Our case set highlights the diagnostic challenges of molecularly defined renal tumors and expands the morphological spectrum of SDH-deficient RCC with unusual histological features. Clinically, these tumors appear to be aggressive.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.