Acute severe pain in emergency department: Morphine or low-dose ketamine?

Q3 Medicine Tunisie Medicale Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.62438/tunismed.v102i11.4574
Khedija Zaouche, Mohamed Kilani, Ramla Baccouche, Radhia Boubaker, Hamida Maghraoui
{"title":"Acute severe pain in emergency department: Morphine or low-dose ketamine?","authors":"Khedija Zaouche, Mohamed Kilani, Ramla Baccouche, Radhia Boubaker, Hamida Maghraoui","doi":"10.62438/tunismed.v102i11.4574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Severe pain is a therapeutic emergency that can be life-threatening by its location, its repercussions or the misdiagnosis it can cause.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of analgesia by morphine versus that by low-dose ketamine in severe pain in emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized open study. We included patients over 18 years-old who consulted for severe pain defined by numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥6. Patients of M group received a titration of 10 mg morphine while those of LDK group, received a bolus of 30 mg of ketamine. The primary endpoint was obtaining a NRS of less than 4 within 10 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 120 patients, 66 in the M group and 54 in the LDK group. The mean baseline NRS was 8.8 ± 1.3 in the M group and 8.6 ± 1.4 in the LDK group (p₌ 0.7). At 10 minutes, the same number of patients in both groups achieved a NRS less than 4 (p = 0.09). However, the mean NRS was significantly lower in the LDK group (p = 0.008). More adverse effects were noted in the LDK group (p <10-3).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Low-dose ketamine appears to be non-inferior to morphine in achieving effective analgesia for severe pain in the emergency department.</p>","PeriodicalId":38818,"journal":{"name":"Tunisie Medicale","volume":"102 11","pages":"886-892"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunisie Medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62438/tunismed.v102i11.4574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Severe pain is a therapeutic emergency that can be life-threatening by its location, its repercussions or the misdiagnosis it can cause.

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of analgesia by morphine versus that by low-dose ketamine in severe pain in emergency department.

Methods: We conducted a randomized open study. We included patients over 18 years-old who consulted for severe pain defined by numeric rating scale (NRS) ≥6. Patients of M group received a titration of 10 mg morphine while those of LDK group, received a bolus of 30 mg of ketamine. The primary endpoint was obtaining a NRS of less than 4 within 10 minutes.

Results: We included 120 patients, 66 in the M group and 54 in the LDK group. The mean baseline NRS was 8.8 ± 1.3 in the M group and 8.6 ± 1.4 in the LDK group (p₌ 0.7). At 10 minutes, the same number of patients in both groups achieved a NRS less than 4 (p = 0.09). However, the mean NRS was significantly lower in the LDK group (p = 0.008). More adverse effects were noted in the LDK group (p <10-3).

Conclusions: Low-dose ketamine appears to be non-inferior to morphine in achieving effective analgesia for severe pain in the emergency department.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科急性剧烈疼痛:吗啡还是小剂量氯胺酮?
导言:目的:研究急诊科重度疼痛患者使用吗啡镇痛与使用小剂量氯胺酮镇痛的疗效:我们进行了一项随机开放研究。方法:我们进行了一项随机开放式研究。研究对象包括年龄在 18 岁以上、因剧烈疼痛就诊的患者,定义为数字评分量表(NRS)≥6。M 组患者接受 10 毫克吗啡滴注,而 LDK 组患者则接受 30 毫克氯胺酮栓塞。主要终点是在 10 分钟内使 NRS 小于 4:我们共纳入了 120 名患者,其中 M 组 66 人,LDK 组 54 人。M 组的平均基线 NRS 为 8.8 ± 1.3,LDK 组为 8.6 ± 1.4(p₌ 0.7)。10 分钟后,两组患者中达到 NRS 小于 4 的人数相同(p = 0.09)。不过,LDK 组的平均 NRS 明显更低(p = 0.008)。低剂量氯胺酮组的不良反应较多(p 结论:低剂量氯胺酮组的不良反应较少:在急诊科重度疼痛的有效镇痛方面,低剂量氯胺酮的效果似乎并不亚于吗啡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Tunisie Medicale
Tunisie Medicale Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
Lacrimal tract trauma: Epidemiological aspects and prognostic factors in a population of southern Tunisia. Exploring risk factors and survival rates in invasive cervical carcinoma: New perspectives. The silent genocide in Gaza: The fragility of international law and institutional inaction. Analysis of reliability between pharmacists when using the pediatric prescription optimization tool (GOPP Tool) in Ivorian hospital context. The Global Cost of Silencing Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1