Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin Compared to Enoxaparin Following Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Among Patients Who Have a History of Venous Thromboembolic Disease
Kevin C. Liu MD, Kyle M. Griffith MD, Mary K. Richardson MD, Cory K. Mayfield MD, Natalie M. Kistler BS, Jay R. Lieberman MD, Nathanael D. Heckmann MD
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Aspirin Compared to Enoxaparin Following Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty Among Patients Who Have a History of Venous Thromboembolic Disease","authors":"Kevin C. Liu MD, Kyle M. Griffith MD, Mary K. Richardson MD, Cory K. Mayfield MD, Natalie M. Kistler BS, Jay R. Lieberman MD, Nathanael D. Heckmann MD","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite the broad utilization of aspirin (ASA) as a venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylactic agent following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), few studies have evaluated its safety and efficacy in patients who had a history of VTE. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASA relative to enoxaparin in high-risk total joint arthroplasty patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An all-payer claims database was queried for primary, elective THA, and TKA patients from January 2015 to December 2021. Patients who had a history of VTE were divided based on receipt of either ASA or enoxaparin as VTE prophylaxis. In a 1:1 ratio, 1,429 THA and 2,864 TKA high-risk ASA patients were matched to high-risk enoxaparin patients on age, sex, race, and presence of pertinent comorbidities. Multivariable regression analyses accounted for potential confounders.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After multivariable analyses, similar risk of pulmonary embolism (THA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 2.76; TKA: aOR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.32) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (THA: aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.53 to 2.36) was observed in the ASA cohorts relative to the enoxaparin cohorts. TKA patients in the ASA cohort had a lower risk of DVT than those in the enoxaparin cohort (aOR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.96). THA ASA patients demonstrated a reduced risk of stroke (aOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.73), while TKA ASA patients had a lower risk of acute blood loss anemia (aOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.88).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>High-risk patients who received ASA demonstrated similar risk of pulmonary embolism and DVT, but decreased risk of bleeding-related and medical complications compared to patients who received enoxaparin. The utilization of ASA in high-risk patients was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":"40 6","pages":"Pages 1484-1491.e4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540324012427","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite the broad utilization of aspirin (ASA) as a venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylactic agent following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), few studies have evaluated its safety and efficacy in patients who had a history of VTE. This study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ASA relative to enoxaparin in high-risk total joint arthroplasty patients.
Methods
An all-payer claims database was queried for primary, elective THA, and TKA patients from January 2015 to December 2021. Patients who had a history of VTE were divided based on receipt of either ASA or enoxaparin as VTE prophylaxis. In a 1:1 ratio, 1,429 THA and 2,864 TKA high-risk ASA patients were matched to high-risk enoxaparin patients on age, sex, race, and presence of pertinent comorbidities. Multivariable regression analyses accounted for potential confounders.
Results
After multivariable analyses, similar risk of pulmonary embolism (THA: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 2.76; TKA: aOR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.32) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (THA: aOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.53 to 2.36) was observed in the ASA cohorts relative to the enoxaparin cohorts. TKA patients in the ASA cohort had a lower risk of DVT than those in the enoxaparin cohort (aOR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.96). THA ASA patients demonstrated a reduced risk of stroke (aOR: 0.03, 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.73), while TKA ASA patients had a lower risk of acute blood loss anemia (aOR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66 to 0.88).
Conclusions
High-risk patients who received ASA demonstrated similar risk of pulmonary embolism and DVT, but decreased risk of bleeding-related and medical complications compared to patients who received enoxaparin. The utilization of ASA in high-risk patients was not associated with an increased risk of adverse outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.