Open and all-inside arthroscopic Brostrom-Gould for chronic lateral ankle instability: A comparative analysis of surgical outcomes and learning curves.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the learning curve and clinical outcomes of all-inside arthroscopic and open techniques in the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).

Method: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of 100 consecutive patients who received all-inside arthroscopic or open Brostrom-Gould surgery. These patients with CLAI were all surgically treated by the same surgeon. We applied the CUSUM analysis to assess the surgeons' learning curves, determine the cut-off point, and subsequently divide the patients into learning and proficiency groups. We recorded and compared baseline data, the preoperative and postoperative clinical function scores (AOFAS, K-P, and Tegner scores), VAS scores, time to full weight-bearing, surgery-related parameters (operation time, and postoperative hospital stays), and complications for both surgical methods during their learning and proficiency phases.

Result: The CUSUM analysis identified a learning curve cutoff at 12 cases for open surgery and 22 cases for arthroscopic surgery. In the open surgery group, significant differences were observed in operation time between the learning and proficiency phases (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in clinical function scores and postoperative full weight-bearing time. Similar trends were seen in the arthroscopic surgery group, with significant improvements in operation timeand postoperative hospitalization time in the proficiency phase compared to the learning phase (P < 0.05). However, no significant differences were found in clinical function scores between either surgical method's learning and proficiency stages. Additionally, when comparing the two surgical approaches at the same stage, significant differences emerged in VAS scores, postoperative full weight-bearing time, operation timeand postoperative hospitalization time (P < 0.05), with the arthroscopic technique showing advantages in reduced postoperative discomfort and faster recovery times.

Conclusion: Although arthroscopic surgery takes longer to achieve proficiency, it offers the advantages of reduced postoperative discomfort and faster recovery times during both the learning and proficiency phases while achieving comparable clinical outcomes.