Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence model for the detection of pneumothorax at chest X-ray

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical Imaging Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110355
Caterina Beatrice Monti , Lorenzo Maria Giuseppe Bianchi , Francesco Rizzetto , Luca Alessandro Carbonaro , Angelo Vanzulli
{"title":"Diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence model for the detection of pneumothorax at chest X-ray","authors":"Caterina Beatrice Monti ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Maria Giuseppe Bianchi ,&nbsp;Francesco Rizzetto ,&nbsp;Luca Alessandro Carbonaro ,&nbsp;Angelo Vanzulli","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Pneumothorax (PTX) is a common clinical urgency, its diagnosis is usually performed on chest radiography (CXR), and it presents a setting where artificial intelligence (AI) methods could find terrain in aiding radiologists in facing increasing workloads. Hence, the purpose of our study was to test an AI system for the detection of PTX on CXR examinations, to review its diagnostic performance in such setting alongside that of reading radiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>We retrospectively ran an AI system on CXR examinations of patients who were imaged for the suspicion of PTX, and who also underwent computed tomography (CT) within the same day, the latter being used as reference standard. The performance of the proposed AI system was compared to that of reading radiologists, obtained from CXR reports.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the AI system achieved an accuracy of 74 % (95%CI 68–79 %), with a sensitivity of 66 % (95%CI 59–73 %) and a specificity of 93 % (95%CI 85–97 %). Human readers displayed a comparable accuracy (77 %, 95%CI 71–82 %, <em>p</em> = 0.355), with higher sensitivity (73 %, 95%CI 66–79 %, <em>p</em> = 0.040), albeit lower specificity (85 %, 95%CI 75–91 %, <em>p</em> = 0.034). The performance of AI was influenced by patient positioning at CXR (<em>p</em> = 0.040).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proposed tool could represent an aid to radiologists in detecting PTX, improving specificity. Further improvement with training on more challenging cases may pave the way for its use as a screening or standalone tool.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 110355"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124002857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Pneumothorax (PTX) is a common clinical urgency, its diagnosis is usually performed on chest radiography (CXR), and it presents a setting where artificial intelligence (AI) methods could find terrain in aiding radiologists in facing increasing workloads. Hence, the purpose of our study was to test an AI system for the detection of PTX on CXR examinations, to review its diagnostic performance in such setting alongside that of reading radiologists.

Method

We retrospectively ran an AI system on CXR examinations of patients who were imaged for the suspicion of PTX, and who also underwent computed tomography (CT) within the same day, the latter being used as reference standard. The performance of the proposed AI system was compared to that of reading radiologists, obtained from CXR reports.

Results

Overall, the AI system achieved an accuracy of 74 % (95%CI 68–79 %), with a sensitivity of 66 % (95%CI 59–73 %) and a specificity of 93 % (95%CI 85–97 %). Human readers displayed a comparable accuracy (77 %, 95%CI 71–82 %, p = 0.355), with higher sensitivity (73 %, 95%CI 66–79 %, p = 0.040), albeit lower specificity (85 %, 95%CI 75–91 %, p = 0.034). The performance of AI was influenced by patient positioning at CXR (p = 0.040).

Conclusions

The proposed tool could represent an aid to radiologists in detecting PTX, improving specificity. Further improvement with training on more challenging cases may pave the way for its use as a screening or standalone tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能模型在胸部 X 光检测气胸方面的诊断性能。
目的:气胸(PTX)是一种常见的临床急症,其诊断通常是通过胸部X光检查(CXR)进行的,人工智能(AI)方法可以在这种情况下帮助放射科医生应对日益增加的工作量。因此,我们研究的目的是测试一个在 CXR 检查中检测 PTX 的人工智能系统,以审查其在这种情况下与放射科医生的诊断性能:方法:我们对因怀疑患有 PTX 而接受造影检查的患者的 CXR 检查进行了回顾性人工智能系统测试,这些患者在同一天还接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)检查,后者被用作参考标准。将所建议的人工智能系统的性能与阅片放射科医生从 CXR 报告中获得的性能进行了比较:总体而言,人工智能系统的准确率为 74%(95%CI 68-79%),灵敏度为 66%(95%CI 59-73%),特异性为 93%(95%CI 85-97%)。人类读者的准确率相当(77 %,95%CI 71-82 %,p = 0.355),灵敏度较高(73 %,95%CI 66-79 %,p = 0.040),但特异性较低(85 %,95%CI 75-91 %,p = 0.034)。人工智能的性能受患者进行 CXR 检查时的体位影响(p = 0.040):结论:所提出的工具可帮助放射科医生检测 PTX,提高特异性。通过对更具挑战性的病例进行培训来进一步改进该工具,可为其作为筛查工具或独立工具使用铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
期刊最新文献
Contents Mechanical clot disruption during pulmonary thromboembolectomy is safe: A propensity score-matched analysis Evaluation of aortic stent endoleaks in the renally impaired patient with ferumoxytol-enhanced MR angiography Advancing breast cancer screening through information-theoretic approaches and AI Corrigendum to “Comprehensive multimodality imaging review of reproductive interventions and their complications” [Clin. Imaging (December 2024) 110312]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1