Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair For The Management of Aorto-Esophageal Fistulae: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Endovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1177/15266028241300403
Changtian Wang, Zhilong Xi, Ludwig K von Segesser, Alberto Pozzoli, Enrico Ferrari
{"title":"Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair For The Management of Aorto-Esophageal Fistulae: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Changtian Wang, Zhilong Xi, Ludwig K von Segesser, Alberto Pozzoli, Enrico Ferrari","doi":"10.1177/15266028241300403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare condition consisting in a fistula between the aorta and the esophagus. The thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an accepted treatment for initial AEF management, but large series are not available and outcomes are questionable. This study aims at evaluating the current evidence of TEVAR in AEF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search on PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted up to June 2023. Data on article type, patients' demographics, cause and type of AEF, clinical presentation, time from clinical presentation to TEVAR, strategies, mortality, and follow-up were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>106 reports published between 1997 and 2023 were deemed eligible for this study (92 case reports; 14 case-series). A total of 163 patients (mean age: 58.9±16.5 years), diagnosed with AEF and treated with TEVAR (with or without staged surgical repair of the esophagus or the aorta) were included. A thoracic aortic aneurysm (34.4%) was the most common cause of AEF, followed by esophageal cancer (25.2%), foreign body in esophagus (13.5%) and post-TEVAR complication (9.8%). Primary AEF were 129 (79.1%), and secondary AEF were 34 (20.9%). TEVAR alone was performed 80 times (49.1%), while TEVAR with staged esophageal or aortic surgery 83 times (50.9%). The overall 30-day mortality was 11.7% (n=19): 18.8% in TEVAR alone and 4.8% in TEVAR with staged surgery, respectively (p=0.006). Mean follow-up time was 12.3±14.7 months. The overall 6-month mortality was 34.4% (n=56): 48.8% in TEVAR alone and 20.5% in TEVAR with staged surgery (p<0.001). Bleeding for recurrence of AEF and sepsis were the main causes of death.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In case of AEF, TEVAR can be urgently performed for bleeding management and hemodynamic control. TEVAR alone is a valuable yet not definitive procedure. Instead, TEVAR followed by surgical repair may provide better outcomes and should be recommended, when possible.</p><p><strong>Clinical impact: </strong>This review summarizes the published papers on endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of aorto-esophageal fistulae. The clinicians can find several important details on how to manage the presence of an esophageal fistulae wich represents a potential life-threatening problem for the patients. The implantation of a thoracic endovascular aortic prosthesis represents a fast and reliable procedure in case of emergency but a second step surgical repair provides better outcomes and should be recommended in suitable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028241300403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028241300403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Aorto-esophageal fistula (AEF) is a rare condition consisting in a fistula between the aorta and the esophagus. The thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become an accepted treatment for initial AEF management, but large series are not available and outcomes are questionable. This study aims at evaluating the current evidence of TEVAR in AEF.

Methods: A search on PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE was conducted up to June 2023. Data on article type, patients' demographics, cause and type of AEF, clinical presentation, time from clinical presentation to TEVAR, strategies, mortality, and follow-up were analyzed.

Results: 106 reports published between 1997 and 2023 were deemed eligible for this study (92 case reports; 14 case-series). A total of 163 patients (mean age: 58.9±16.5 years), diagnosed with AEF and treated with TEVAR (with or without staged surgical repair of the esophagus or the aorta) were included. A thoracic aortic aneurysm (34.4%) was the most common cause of AEF, followed by esophageal cancer (25.2%), foreign body in esophagus (13.5%) and post-TEVAR complication (9.8%). Primary AEF were 129 (79.1%), and secondary AEF were 34 (20.9%). TEVAR alone was performed 80 times (49.1%), while TEVAR with staged esophageal or aortic surgery 83 times (50.9%). The overall 30-day mortality was 11.7% (n=19): 18.8% in TEVAR alone and 4.8% in TEVAR with staged surgery, respectively (p=0.006). Mean follow-up time was 12.3±14.7 months. The overall 6-month mortality was 34.4% (n=56): 48.8% in TEVAR alone and 20.5% in TEVAR with staged surgery (p<0.001). Bleeding for recurrence of AEF and sepsis were the main causes of death.

Conclusions: In case of AEF, TEVAR can be urgently performed for bleeding management and hemodynamic control. TEVAR alone is a valuable yet not definitive procedure. Instead, TEVAR followed by surgical repair may provide better outcomes and should be recommended, when possible.

Clinical impact: This review summarizes the published papers on endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of aorto-esophageal fistulae. The clinicians can find several important details on how to manage the presence of an esophageal fistulae wich represents a potential life-threatening problem for the patients. The implantation of a thoracic endovascular aortic prosthesis represents a fast and reliable procedure in case of emergency but a second step surgical repair provides better outcomes and should be recommended in suitable patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胸腔内血管主动脉修复术治疗主动脉食管瘘:系统回顾。
目的:主动脉食管瘘(AEF)是一种罕见的主动脉和食管之间的瘘管。胸腔内血管主动脉修补术(TEVAR)已成为治疗 AEF 的一种公认方法,但目前尚无大样本病例,且疗效存疑。本研究旨在评估 TEVAR 治疗 AEF 的现有证据:方法:对截至 2023 年 6 月的 PubMed/MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 进行检索。分析了文章类型、患者人口统计学、AEF病因和类型、临床表现、从临床表现到TEVAR的时间、策略、死亡率和随访等数据:1997年至2023年间发表的106篇报道被认为符合本研究的要求(92篇病例报告;14篇病例系列)。共有 163 名患者(平均年龄:58.9±16.5 岁)被确诊为 AEF,并接受了 TEVAR 治疗(无论是否对食管或主动脉进行了分期手术修复)。胸主动脉瘤(34.4%)是导致 AEF 的最常见原因,其次是食管癌(25.2%)、食管异物(13.5%)和 TEVAR 术后并发症(9.8%)。原发性 AEF 有 129 例(79.1%),继发性 AEF 有 34 例(20.9%)。单独进行TEVAR手术80例(49.1%),TEVAR与食管或主动脉分期手术83例(50.9%)。30 天总死亡率为 11.7%(n=19):单用 TEVAR 的死亡率为 18.8%,分期手术 TEVAR 的死亡率为 4.8%(P=0.006)。平均随访时间为(12.3±14.7)个月。6个月的总死亡率为34.4%(n=56):单纯 TEVAR 的死亡率为 48.8%,分期手术 TEVAR 的死亡率为 20.5%(P=0.006):发生 AEF 时,可紧急实施 TEVAR 以控制出血和血流动力学。单纯 TEVAR 是一种有价值的手术,但并不是决定性的手术。相反,TEVAR 之后再进行手术修复可能会取得更好的疗效,在可能的情况下应推荐使用:本综述总结了已发表的关于用血管内主动脉修补术治疗主动脉食管瘘的论文。临床医生可以从中找到一些重要的细节,了解如何处理食管瘘这一可能威胁患者生命的问题。在紧急情况下,植入胸腔内血管主动脉假体是一种快速、可靠的治疗方法,但第二步手术修复能提供更好的治疗效果,因此应推荐合适的患者采用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
期刊最新文献
The Value of Different Systemic Inflammatory Response Indicators in the Long-term Prognosis of Type B Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair. Effect of Statins on the Prognosis After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Patients With Acute Type B Aortic Dissection. Potential of D-Dimer as a Tool to Rule Out Sac Expansion in Patients With Persistent Type 2 Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Long-Term Outcomes and Late Complications of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using the GORE TAG or Conformable GORE TAG. Long-term Outcomes of the AcoArt II-BTK Trial: Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Compared With Uncoated Balloons for the Treatment of Infrapopliteal Artery Lesions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1