"It Took Away the Trauma of Failing": A Mixed Methods Feasibility Trial of an Open Goals Physical Activity Program.

Scott G Goddard, Jacqueline Dossetor, Sophia Barry, Alex Lawrence, Christopher J Stevens, Christian Swann
{"title":"\"It Took Away the Trauma of Failing\": A Mixed Methods Feasibility Trial of an Open Goals Physical Activity Program.","authors":"Scott G Goddard, Jacqueline Dossetor, Sophia Barry, Alex Lawrence, Christopher J Stevens, Christian Swann","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2024.2412661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Open goals (e.g. to \"see how many steps you can reach today\") may be a promising strategy for promoting physical activity. The findings from initial studies, typically based on single sessions of exercise, showed that open goals can produce at least as much activity as specific goals (e.g. to reach 10,000 steps a day), while promoting more positive experiences and higher intentions to repeat the activity, especially among less active individuals. However, the feasibility of using open goals over a longer duration remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we examined the feasibility of using open goals in a 10-week step-based physical activity program. A single-arm mixed methods design was used, involving 15 healthy adults (13 female; M<sub>age</sub> = 42.53) with low to moderate physical activity levels. Participants were provided with a pedometer, diary, and open goals for each week, alongside brief support sessions. The feasibility domains assessed included recruitment, acceptability, adherence, and retention. Quantitative methods assessed physical activity, enjoyment, and self-efficacy, while supplementary qualitative methods explored participants' perceptions of open goals. The study showed high recruitment and retention rates, increased physical activity, and positive psychological experiences, indicating the feasibility of the 10-week open-goal program. Secondary outcomes suggest that open goals may function by increasing enjoyment and self-efficacy while decreasing negative outcomes such as pressure, guilt, and failure. The findings indicate that using open goals in longer-term physical activity programs is feasible, expanding on the limitations of previous single-session designs, and offering recommendations for future trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2412661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Open goals (e.g. to "see how many steps you can reach today") may be a promising strategy for promoting physical activity. The findings from initial studies, typically based on single sessions of exercise, showed that open goals can produce at least as much activity as specific goals (e.g. to reach 10,000 steps a day), while promoting more positive experiences and higher intentions to repeat the activity, especially among less active individuals. However, the feasibility of using open goals over a longer duration remains unclear. Therefore, in this study, we examined the feasibility of using open goals in a 10-week step-based physical activity program. A single-arm mixed methods design was used, involving 15 healthy adults (13 female; Mage = 42.53) with low to moderate physical activity levels. Participants were provided with a pedometer, diary, and open goals for each week, alongside brief support sessions. The feasibility domains assessed included recruitment, acceptability, adherence, and retention. Quantitative methods assessed physical activity, enjoyment, and self-efficacy, while supplementary qualitative methods explored participants' perceptions of open goals. The study showed high recruitment and retention rates, increased physical activity, and positive psychological experiences, indicating the feasibility of the 10-week open-goal program. Secondary outcomes suggest that open goals may function by increasing enjoyment and self-efficacy while decreasing negative outcomes such as pressure, guilt, and failure. The findings indicate that using open goals in longer-term physical activity programs is feasible, expanding on the limitations of previous single-session designs, and offering recommendations for future trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"它消除了失败的创伤":开放目标体育活动计划的混合方法可行性试验。
开放式目标(如 "看看今天能走多少步")可能是促进体育锻炼的一种有前途的策略。最初的研究通常以单次锻炼为基础,研究结果表明,开放式目标至少能产生与特定目标(如每天达到 10,000 步)一样多的活动量,同时还能促进更积极的体验和更高的重复活动意愿,尤其是在不太活跃的人群中。然而,在较长时间内使用开放式目标的可行性仍不清楚。因此,在本研究中,我们考察了在为期 10 周的基于步数的体育锻炼计划中使用开放式目标的可行性。本研究采用单臂混合方法设计,共有 15 名健康成年人(13 名女性;Mage = 42.53)参加,他们的体力活动水平处于中低水平。参与者将获得计步器、日记本、每周开放目标以及简短的支持课程。评估的可行性领域包括招募、可接受性、坚持性和保留性。定量方法评估了身体活动、乐趣和自我效能,而辅助定性方法则探讨了参与者对开放式目标的看法。研究结果显示,参与者的招募率和保留率都很高,身体活动量增加,心理体验积极,这表明为期 10 周的开放式目标计划是可行的。次要结果表明,开放式目标可以通过增加乐趣和自我效能感来发挥作用,同时减少压力、内疚和失败等负面结果。研究结果表明,在长期体育锻炼计划中使用开放式目标是可行的,这也拓展了以往单次设计的局限性,并为未来的试验提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Effects of Instruction and Game Design on Youth Soccer Players' Skill Involvement and Cooperative Team Behaviour. Effect of Training Load Intensification on the Sleep Pattern of Young Soccer Players. Identifying Key Training Load and Intensity Indicators in Ice Hockey Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Duration of Water-Based Exercise on Hemodynamic and Sleep Quality: An of Hypertensives and Normotensives Subanalysis. Inclusion of Game-Based Stimulus During Flywheel Resistance Training Positively Influences Physical Performance in Handball Players.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1