Intravenous glibenclamide for cerebral oedema after large hemispheric stroke (CHARM): a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

Kevin N Sheth, Gregory W Albers, Jeffrey L Saver, Bruce C V Campbell, Bradley J Molyneaux, H E Hinson, Charlotte Cordonnier, Thorsten Steiner, Kazunori Toyoda, Max Wintermark, Ross Littauer, Jessica Collins, Nisha Lucas, Raul G Nogueira, J Marc Simard, Michael Wald, Kate Dawson, W Taylor Kimberly
{"title":"Intravenous glibenclamide for cerebral oedema after large hemispheric stroke (CHARM): a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial","authors":"Kevin N Sheth, Gregory W Albers, Jeffrey L Saver, Bruce C V Campbell, Bradley J Molyneaux, H E Hinson, Charlotte Cordonnier, Thorsten Steiner, Kazunori Toyoda, Max Wintermark, Ross Littauer, Jessica Collins, Nisha Lucas, Raul G Nogueira, J Marc Simard, Michael Wald, Kate Dawson, W Taylor Kimberly","doi":"10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00425-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Background</h3>No treatment is available to prevent brain oedema, which can occur after a large hemispheric infarction. Glibenclamide has previously been shown to improve functional outcome and reduce neurological or oedema-related death in patients younger than 70 years who were at risk of brain oedema after an acute ischaemic stroke. We aimed to assess whether intravenous glibenclamide could improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with large hemispheric infarction.<h3>Methods</h3>CHARM was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial conducted across 143 acute stroke centres in 21 countries. We included patients aged 18–85 years with a large stroke, defined either by an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 1–5 or by an ischaemic core lesion volume of 80–300 mL on CT perfusion or MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either intravenous glibenclamide (8·6 mg over 72 h) or placebo. The study drug was started within 10 h of stroke onset. The primary efficacy outcome was the shift in the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale at day 90, as a measure of functional outcome. The primary efficacy outcome was analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients aged 18–70 years. The safety population comprised all randomly assigned patients who received a dose. This trial is registered with <span><span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span> (<span><span>NCT02864953</span><svg aria-label=\"Opens in new window\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"20\" viewbox=\"0 0 8 8\"><path d=\"M1.12949 2.1072V1H7V6.85795H5.89111V2.90281L0.784057 8L0 7.21635L5.11902 2.1072H1.12949Z\"></path></svg></span>). The trial was stopped early by the sponsor for strategic and operational reasons (slow enrolment because of COVID-19), before any unblinding or knowledge of the trial results.<h3>Findings</h3>Between Aug 29, 2018, and May 23, 2023, 535 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 518 received a dose (safety population) and 431 were aged 18–70 years and comprised the modified intention-to-treat population (217 were assigned glibenclamide and 214 placebo). The mean age of patients was 58·7 (SD 9·0) years in the placebo group and 58·0 (9·5) years in the glibenclamide group; the median US National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 19 (IQR 16–23) in the placebo group and 19 (IQR 16–22) in the glibenclamide group; and the mean time from stroke onset to study drug start was 8·9 h (SD 2·1) in the placebo group and 9·2 h (2·1) in the glibenclamide group. Intravenous glibenclamide was not associated with a favourable shift in the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (common odds ratio [OR] 1·17 [95% CI 0·80–1·71], p=0·42). 90-day mortality was 29% (61 of 214) in the placebo group and 32% (70 of 217) in the glibenclamide group (hazard ratio 1·20 [0·85–1·70]; p=0·30). Serious adverse events in the prespecified safety population were consistent with the known safety profile of glibenclamide and included hypoglycaemia in 15 (6%) of 259 patients in the glibenclamide group and in four (2%) of 259 patients in the placebo group, leading to dose interruption or reduction in seven (3%) patients in the glibenclamide group and in one (&lt;1%) in the placebo group.<h3>Interpretation</h3>Intravenous glibenclamide did not improve functional outcome in patients aged 18–70 years after large hemispheric infarction, although the trial was underpowered to make definitive conclusions because it was stopped early. Future prospective evaluation could be warranted to identify a possible benefit of intravenous glibenclamide in specific subgroups.<h3>Funding</h3>Biogen.","PeriodicalId":22676,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Neurology","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00425-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

No treatment is available to prevent brain oedema, which can occur after a large hemispheric infarction. Glibenclamide has previously been shown to improve functional outcome and reduce neurological or oedema-related death in patients younger than 70 years who were at risk of brain oedema after an acute ischaemic stroke. We aimed to assess whether intravenous glibenclamide could improve functional outcome at 90 days in patients with large hemispheric infarction.

Methods

CHARM was a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial conducted across 143 acute stroke centres in 21 countries. We included patients aged 18–85 years with a large stroke, defined either by an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) of 1–5 or by an ischaemic core lesion volume of 80–300 mL on CT perfusion or MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either intravenous glibenclamide (8·6 mg over 72 h) or placebo. The study drug was started within 10 h of stroke onset. The primary efficacy outcome was the shift in the distribution of scores on the modified Rankin Scale at day 90, as a measure of functional outcome. The primary efficacy outcome was analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned patients aged 18–70 years. The safety population comprised all randomly assigned patients who received a dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02864953). The trial was stopped early by the sponsor for strategic and operational reasons (slow enrolment because of COVID-19), before any unblinding or knowledge of the trial results.

Findings

Between Aug 29, 2018, and May 23, 2023, 535 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, of whom 518 received a dose (safety population) and 431 were aged 18–70 years and comprised the modified intention-to-treat population (217 were assigned glibenclamide and 214 placebo). The mean age of patients was 58·7 (SD 9·0) years in the placebo group and 58·0 (9·5) years in the glibenclamide group; the median US National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 19 (IQR 16–23) in the placebo group and 19 (IQR 16–22) in the glibenclamide group; and the mean time from stroke onset to study drug start was 8·9 h (SD 2·1) in the placebo group and 9·2 h (2·1) in the glibenclamide group. Intravenous glibenclamide was not associated with a favourable shift in the modified Rankin scale at 90 days (common odds ratio [OR] 1·17 [95% CI 0·80–1·71], p=0·42). 90-day mortality was 29% (61 of 214) in the placebo group and 32% (70 of 217) in the glibenclamide group (hazard ratio 1·20 [0·85–1·70]; p=0·30). Serious adverse events in the prespecified safety population were consistent with the known safety profile of glibenclamide and included hypoglycaemia in 15 (6%) of 259 patients in the glibenclamide group and in four (2%) of 259 patients in the placebo group, leading to dose interruption or reduction in seven (3%) patients in the glibenclamide group and in one (<1%) in the placebo group.

Interpretation

Intravenous glibenclamide did not improve functional outcome in patients aged 18–70 years after large hemispheric infarction, although the trial was underpowered to make definitive conclusions because it was stopped early. Future prospective evaluation could be warranted to identify a possible benefit of intravenous glibenclamide in specific subgroups.

Funding

Biogen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉注射格列本脲治疗大半球中风后脑水肿(CHARM):第 3 期双盲安慰剂对照随机试验
背景目前还没有预防脑水肿的治疗方法,脑水肿可能发生在大面积半球脑梗死之后。格列本脲曾被证明可改善 70 岁以下急性缺血性脑卒中后有脑水肿风险的患者的功能预后,并减少神经系统或水肿相关的死亡。我们旨在评估静脉注射格列本脲是否能改善大面积半球脑梗死患者 90 天后的功能预后。方法CHARM 是一项 3 期、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验,在 21 个国家的 143 个急性中风中心进行。我们纳入了年龄在 18-85 岁的大面积脑卒中患者,其定义为阿尔伯塔省脑卒中计划早期 CT 评分(ASPECTS)为 1-5 分,或 CT 灌注或 MRI 弥散加权成像显示缺血性核心病灶体积为 80-300 mL。患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配到静脉注射格列本脲(8-6 毫克,72 小时)或安慰剂。研究药物在中风发生后 10 小时内开始使用。主要疗效结果是第90天时改良Rankin量表评分分布的变化,以此衡量功能结果。主要疗效结果在修改后的意向治疗人群中进行分析,该人群包括所有随机分配的 18-70 岁患者。安全性研究对象包括所有随机分配并接受了一定剂量治疗的患者。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT02864953)。在2018年8月29日至2023年5月23日期间,535名患者入组并被随机分配,其中518名患者接受了一个剂量(安全人群),431名年龄在18-70岁之间的患者组成了修改后的意向治疗人群(217名患者被分配了格列本脲,214名患者被分配了安慰剂)。安慰剂组患者的平均年龄为58-7(SD 9-0)岁,格列本脲组为58-0(9-5)岁;安慰剂组美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)的中位数为19(IQR 16-23)分,格列本脲组为19(IQR 16-22)分;从中风发作到开始用药的平均时间,安慰剂组为8-9小时(SD 2-1),格列本脲组为9-2小时(2-1)。静脉注射格列本脲与90天时改良Rankin量表的有利变化无关(常见几率比[OR] 1-17 [95% CI 0-80-1-71],P=0-42)。安慰剂组的 90 天死亡率为 29%(214 例中的 61 例),格列本脲组为 32%(217 例中的 70 例)(危险比 1-20 [0-85-1-70]; p=0-30)。预设安全性人群中发生的严重不良事件与已知的格列本脲安全性特征一致,包括格列本脲组259例患者中15例(6%)和安慰剂组259例患者中4例(2%)发生低血糖,导致格列本脲组7例(3%)和安慰剂组1例(<1%)患者中断或减少剂量。解读静脉注射格列本脲并不能改善18-70岁大面积半球脑梗死患者的功能预后,但由于试验提前结束,因此不足以得出明确结论。未来有必要进行前瞻性评估,以确定静脉注射格列本脲对特定亚组可能带来的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to Lancet Neurol 2025; 24: 65–76 Infectious diseases research in 2024: insights into dementia Neuroscience research in 2024: advances in blood biomarkers and brain omics Correction to Lancet Neurol 2024; 23: 1183–84 Correction to Lancet Neurol 2024; 23: 1205–13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1