Cost-Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Real-World, 2-Year Prospective Study

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.2337/dc24-1110
Shihchen Kuo, Wen Ye, Di Wang, Laura N. McEwen, Claudia Villatoro Santos, William H. Herman
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Real-World, 2-Year Prospective Study","authors":"Shihchen Kuo, Wen Ye, Di Wang, Laura N. McEwen, Claudia Villatoro Santos, William H. Herman","doi":"10.2337/dc24-1110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE We evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) for people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We performed difference-in-differences analyses using individual-level health insurance claims and survey data for 5,948 adults with prediabetes who enrolled (n = 575) or did not enroll (n = 5,373) in the NDPP to assess NDPP’s effects on health economic outcomes. We assessed direct medical costs for the year before the NDPP enrollment/index date and for 2 years thereafter; EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years; and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years. We used propensity score weighting to adjust for potential bias due to self-selection for enrollment, multiple imputation to handle missing data, and bootstrapping to produce CIs. We adopted a health care sector perspective and discounted costs and QALYs at 3% annually. Costs were expressed in 2020 U.S. dollars. RESULTS Compared with nonenrollees, each NDPP enrollee had an average reduction of $4,552 (95% CI −13,231, 2,014) in 2-year total direct medical costs. Cost savings were primarily related to hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and emergency room visits. Compared with nonenrollees, each enrollee had no difference in EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 2 years or QALYs gained over 2 years. The uncertainty analyses found that enrollment in the NDPP had an 88% probability of saving money and 84% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY-gained over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world population with prediabetes, enrollment in the NDPP was likely to provide cost savings.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-1110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE We evaluated the real-world cost-effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) for people with prediabetes in a large workforce with employer-sponsored health insurance. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We performed difference-in-differences analyses using individual-level health insurance claims and survey data for 5,948 adults with prediabetes who enrolled (n = 575) or did not enroll (n = 5,373) in the NDPP to assess NDPP’s effects on health economic outcomes. We assessed direct medical costs for the year before the NDPP enrollment/index date and for 2 years thereafter; EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility scores at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years; and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over 2 years. We used propensity score weighting to adjust for potential bias due to self-selection for enrollment, multiple imputation to handle missing data, and bootstrapping to produce CIs. We adopted a health care sector perspective and discounted costs and QALYs at 3% annually. Costs were expressed in 2020 U.S. dollars. RESULTS Compared with nonenrollees, each NDPP enrollee had an average reduction of $4,552 (95% CI −13,231, 2,014) in 2-year total direct medical costs. Cost savings were primarily related to hospitalizations, outpatient visits, and emergency room visits. Compared with nonenrollees, each enrollee had no difference in EQ-5D-5L utility scores at 2 years or QALYs gained over 2 years. The uncertainty analyses found that enrollment in the NDPP had an 88% probability of saving money and 84% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY-gained over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS In this real-world population with prediabetes, enrollment in the NDPP was likely to provide cost savings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全国糖尿病预防计划的成本效益:一项为期两年的前瞻性真实世界研究
目的 我们评估了国家糖尿病预防计划 (NDPP) 对拥有雇主医疗保险的大量糖尿病前期患者的实际成本效益。研究设计与方法 我们使用个人健康保险索赔和调查数据对 5948 名参加(575 人)或未参加(5373 人)NDPP 的糖尿病前期成人患者进行了差异分析,以评估 NDPP 对健康经济结果的影响。我们评估了 NDPP 入选/索引日期前一年及其后两年的直接医疗费用;基线、1 年和 2 年的 EuroQol 5 维 5 级问卷 (EQ-5D-5L) 实用性评分;以及 2 年的质量调整生命年 (QALY)。我们使用倾向得分加权法来调整因自我选择入选而产生的潜在偏差,使用多重估算法来处理缺失数据,并使用引导法得出 CIs。我们从医疗保健行业的角度出发,将成本和 QALYs 每年折现 3%。成本以 2020 年美元表示。结果 与未参保者相比,每位 NDPP 参保者 2 年的直接医疗总费用平均减少了 4552 美元(95% CI -13231,2014)。节省的费用主要与住院、门诊和急诊有关。与未参加者相比,每位参加者在 2 年的 EQ-5D-5L 实用性评分或 2 年的 QALYs 收益方面均无差异。不确定性分析发现,在支付意愿阈值为 100,000 美元/2 年 QALY 收益时,参加 NDPP 的省钱概率为 88%,具有成本效益的概率为 84%。结论 在这个真实世界的糖尿病前期人群中,加入 NDPP 有可能节约成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
期刊最新文献
Reduced Aqueous Retinol-Binding Protein 3 Concentration Is Associated With Diabetic Macular Edema and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy Burden and Excess Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Using KDIGO Classification: A National Cohort Study Cost-Effectiveness of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: A Real-World, 2-Year Prospective Study Life Course Associations Between Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and the Prevalence of Prediabetes and Diabetes: A Longitudinal Cohort Study in Taiwan and Hong Kong Consensus Considerations and Good Practice Points for Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Hospital Settings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1