Improved microbial water quality and ozone performance following coagulation: implications for carbon based advanced treatment for potable reuse†

IF 3.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1039/D4EW00638K
Christina M. Morrison, Ariel J. Atkinson, Daniel Gerrity and Eric C. Wert
{"title":"Improved microbial water quality and ozone performance following coagulation: implications for carbon based advanced treatment for potable reuse†","authors":"Christina M. Morrison, Ariel J. Atkinson, Daniel Gerrity and Eric C. Wert","doi":"10.1039/D4EW00638K","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >To facilitate broader implementation of potable reuse, it is important to fully account for pathogen log<small><sub>10</sub></small> reduction values (LRVs), including unit processes that are historically uncredited or under-credited. Despite its potential for pathogen removal, coagulation coupled with flocculation (C/F) has historically been omitted or overlooked when pursuing credits for potable reuse. However, with greater implementation of carbon-based advanced treatment (CBAT), which utilizes a combination of ozone, biofiltration, and granular activated carbon treatment as an alternative to membrane treatment (<em>i.e.</em>, reverse osmosis), C/F may emerge as a valuable unit process for achieving improvements in water quality, operational performance, and public health protection in potable reuse systems. This study evaluated the ability of C/F with ferric chloride to improve both bulk and microbial water quality of secondary wastewater effluent and improve downstream ozone performance. This study also evaluated potential surrogates for microbial removal during C/F treatment. C/F removed 17–54% of DOC with ferric doses ranging from 10–50 mg Fe per L, with 30 mg Fe per L sufficient for meeting TOC removal requirements from the Stage 1 D/DBPR for all evaluated secondary effluents. Coagulant doses of 30 mg Fe per L obtained LRVs ranging from 2–3 for MS2 and <em>B. subtilis</em> spores. MS2 and <em>B. subtilis</em> spore removal exhibited strong (<em>r</em> ≥ 0.8) and significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) Pearson's correlation with the removal of intact cell counts and total cell counts <em>via</em> flow cytometry (FCM), DOC, total adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and intracellular ATP. C/F immediately preceding ozone treatment improved inactivation of <em>B. subtilis</em> spores, lowered applied ozone doses, and increased ozone exposure (Ct) for similar specific ozone doses as compared to secondary effluent without C/F pre-treatment. Overall, C/F with ferric chloride was determined to be a valuable treatment step for removal of dissolved organic matter, MS2 bacteriophage, <em>B. subtilis</em> spores, and improvement of downstream ozone treatment. Furthermore, FCM, ATP, and DOC were determined to be strong potential candidates as surrogates for microorganism removal during C/F treatment, although further testing with pathogens is still necessary to justify LRV crediting.</p>","PeriodicalId":75,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","volume":" 12","pages":" 3158-3171"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ew/d4ew00638k?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ew/d4ew00638k","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To facilitate broader implementation of potable reuse, it is important to fully account for pathogen log10 reduction values (LRVs), including unit processes that are historically uncredited or under-credited. Despite its potential for pathogen removal, coagulation coupled with flocculation (C/F) has historically been omitted or overlooked when pursuing credits for potable reuse. However, with greater implementation of carbon-based advanced treatment (CBAT), which utilizes a combination of ozone, biofiltration, and granular activated carbon treatment as an alternative to membrane treatment (i.e., reverse osmosis), C/F may emerge as a valuable unit process for achieving improvements in water quality, operational performance, and public health protection in potable reuse systems. This study evaluated the ability of C/F with ferric chloride to improve both bulk and microbial water quality of secondary wastewater effluent and improve downstream ozone performance. This study also evaluated potential surrogates for microbial removal during C/F treatment. C/F removed 17–54% of DOC with ferric doses ranging from 10–50 mg Fe per L, with 30 mg Fe per L sufficient for meeting TOC removal requirements from the Stage 1 D/DBPR for all evaluated secondary effluents. Coagulant doses of 30 mg Fe per L obtained LRVs ranging from 2–3 for MS2 and B. subtilis spores. MS2 and B. subtilis spore removal exhibited strong (r ≥ 0.8) and significant (p < 0.05) Pearson's correlation with the removal of intact cell counts and total cell counts via flow cytometry (FCM), DOC, total adenosine triphosphate (ATP), and intracellular ATP. C/F immediately preceding ozone treatment improved inactivation of B. subtilis spores, lowered applied ozone doses, and increased ozone exposure (Ct) for similar specific ozone doses as compared to secondary effluent without C/F pre-treatment. Overall, C/F with ferric chloride was determined to be a valuable treatment step for removal of dissolved organic matter, MS2 bacteriophage, B. subtilis spores, and improvement of downstream ozone treatment. Furthermore, FCM, ATP, and DOC were determined to be strong potential candidates as surrogates for microorganism removal during C/F treatment, although further testing with pathogens is still necessary to justify LRV crediting.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
混凝后微生物水质和臭氧性能的改善:对用于饮用水回用的碳基先进处理的影响†。
为促进更广泛地实施饮用水回用,必须充分考虑病原体 log10 降低值 (LRV),包括历来未计入或计入不足的单元工艺。尽管混凝加絮凝(C/F)工艺具有去除病原体的潜力,但在为饮用水回用申请抵免额度时,该工艺一直被忽略。然而,随着碳基高级处理技术(CBAT)的广泛应用,碳基高级处理技术将臭氧、生物过滤和颗粒活性炭处理相结合,作为膜处理(即反渗透)的替代技术,C/F 可能会成为饮用水回用系统中改善水质、提高运行性能和保护公众健康的重要单元工艺。本研究评估了含有氯化铁的 C/F 工艺改善二级废水出水的体积和微生物水质以及改善下游臭氧性能的能力。这项研究还评估了在 C/F 处理过程中去除微生物的潜在替代物。在每升含铁量为 10-50 毫克铁的情况下,C/F 可去除 17-54% 的 DOC,其中每升含铁量为 30 毫克铁足以满足所有评估的二级废水中 D/DBPR 第 1 阶段的 TOC 去除要求。混凝剂剂量为每升 30 毫克铁时,MS2 和枯草芽孢杆菌的 LRV 为 2-3 不等。MS2 和枯草芽孢的去除率与通过流式细胞仪 (FCM) 检测的完整细胞数和总细胞数、DOC、三磷酸腺苷 (ATP) 总量和细胞内 ATP 的去除率呈强(r ≥ 0.8)和显著(p < 0.05)的 Pearson 相关性。与未进行 C/F 预处理的二级出水相比,臭氧处理前立即进行 C/F 可提高枯草芽孢杆菌孢子的灭活效果,降低应用臭氧的剂量,并增加类似特定臭氧剂量的臭氧暴露量(Ct)。总之,使用氯化铁的 C/F 被认为是去除溶解有机物、MS2 噬菌体、枯草芽孢杆菌和改善下游臭氧处理的重要处理步骤。此外,FCM、ATP 和 DOC 被确定为在 C/F 处理过程中去除微生物的有力候选替代物,但仍有必要对病原体进行进一步测试,以证明 LRV 信用的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
206
期刊介绍: Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology seeks to showcase high quality research about fundamental science, innovative technologies, and management practices that promote sustainable water.
期刊最新文献
Back cover Applicability of β-lactamase entrapped agarose discs for removal of doripenem antibiotic: reusability and scale-up studies† Improved microbial water quality and ozone performance following coagulation: implications for carbon based advanced treatment for potable reuse† Spectral characteristics of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in the middle reaches of the Huai River in a dry season† Sorption and biodegradation of stormwater trace organic contaminants via composite alginate bead geomedia with encapsulated microorganisms†
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1