Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with MS: Results from the ESTEEM Phase 4 and PROCLAIM Phase 3 Studies with a Focus on Older Patients.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-03047-w
Yang Mao-Draayer, Amit Bar-Or, Konstantin Balashov, John Foley, Kyle Smoot, Erin E Longbrake, Derrick Robertson, Jason P Mendoza, James B Lewin, Nicholas Everage, Ivan Božin, Jennifer Lyons, Oksana Mokliatchouk, Eris Bame, Fabrizio Giuliani
{"title":"Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with MS: Results from the ESTEEM Phase 4 and PROCLAIM Phase 3 Studies with a Focus on Older Patients.","authors":"Yang Mao-Draayer, Amit Bar-Or, Konstantin Balashov, John Foley, Kyle Smoot, Erin E Longbrake, Derrick Robertson, Jason P Mendoza, James B Lewin, Nicholas Everage, Ivan Božin, Jennifer Lyons, Oksana Mokliatchouk, Eris Bame, Fabrizio Giuliani","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03047-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Real-world studies in the USA report that 41-56% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are ≥ 50 years old, yet data on their response to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is limited. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral DMT approved for treating relapsing MS. This analysis evaluated the safety, efficacy, and immunophenotype changes of DMF in patients ≥ 50 years compared with patients < 50 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ESTEEM, a 5-year, real-world, observational phase 4 study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of DMF, including treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment discontinuation. Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) were recorded from a subset of patients. The PROCLAIM study, a phase 3b interventional study, reported safety outcomes and lymphocyte subset changes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with DMF. The study evaluated safety outcomes by analyzing the incidence of SAEs and detailed changes in CD4<sup>+</sup> and CD8<sup>+</sup> T cell compartments over 96 weeks of DMF treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ESTEEM included 4020 patients aged < 50 years and 1069 aged ≥ 50 years. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 19.6% patients < 50 years and 29.6% of patients ≥ 50 years, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. SAEs were reported by 5.2% of patients < 50 years and 8.9% those ≥ 50 years. In PROCLAIM, SAEs were reported in 13% of patients < 50 years and 10% of those ≥ 50 years. Median ALC decreased by 35% in patients < 50 years and 50% in those ≥ 50 years in ESTEEM, with similar patterns observed in PROCLAIM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ESTEEM found no unexpected safety signals in older patients and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were significantly reduced in both age groups. Both studies indicated that DMF is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile in patients with RRMS aged ≥ 50 years.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ESTEEM (NCT02047097), PROCLAIM (NCT02525874).</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03047-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Real-world studies in the USA report that 41-56% of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are ≥ 50 years old, yet data on their response to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is limited. Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is an oral DMT approved for treating relapsing MS. This analysis evaluated the safety, efficacy, and immunophenotype changes of DMF in patients ≥ 50 years compared with patients < 50 years.

Methods: ESTEEM, a 5-year, real-world, observational phase 4 study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of DMF, including treatment-emergent serious adverse events (SAEs) and adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment discontinuation. Absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) were recorded from a subset of patients. The PROCLAIM study, a phase 3b interventional study, reported safety outcomes and lymphocyte subset changes in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) treated with DMF. The study evaluated safety outcomes by analyzing the incidence of SAEs and detailed changes in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell compartments over 96 weeks of DMF treatment.

Results: ESTEEM included 4020 patients aged < 50 years and 1069 aged ≥ 50 years. AEs leading to discontinuation were reported by 19.6% patients < 50 years and 29.6% of patients ≥ 50 years, with gastrointestinal disorders being the most common. SAEs were reported by 5.2% of patients < 50 years and 8.9% those ≥ 50 years. In PROCLAIM, SAEs were reported in 13% of patients < 50 years and 10% of those ≥ 50 years. Median ALC decreased by 35% in patients < 50 years and 50% in those ≥ 50 years in ESTEEM, with similar patterns observed in PROCLAIM.

Conclusions: ESTEEM found no unexpected safety signals in older patients and annualized relapse rates (ARRs) were significantly reduced in both age groups. Both studies indicated that DMF is efficacious and has a favorable safety profile in patients with RRMS aged ≥ 50 years.

Clinical trial registration: ESTEEM (NCT02047097), PROCLAIM (NCT02525874).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
富马酸二甲酯对多发性硬化症患者的实际安全性和有效性:以老年患者为重点的 ESTEEM 第 4 期和 PROCLAIM 第 3 期研究结果。
导言:美国的实际研究报告显示,41%-56%的多发性硬化症(MS)患者年龄≥50岁,但有关他们对改变病情疗法(DMT)的反应的数据却很有限。富马酸二甲酯(DMF)是一种获准用于治疗复发性多发性硬化症的口服 DMT。这项分析评估了 DMF 对年龄≥ 50 岁患者的安全性、疗效和免疫表型变化,并与患者进行了比较:ESTEEM是一项为期5年的真实世界观察性4期研究,评估了DMF的安全性和有效性,包括治疗引发的严重不良事件(SAE)和导致治疗中止的不良事件(AE)。对部分患者的绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC)进行了记录。PROCLAIM研究是一项3b期干预研究,报告了接受DMF治疗的复发性缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)患者的安全性结果和淋巴细胞亚群变化。该研究通过分析SAE的发生率以及DMF治疗96周期间CD4+和CD8+T细胞群的详细变化来评估安全性结果:结果:ESTEEM共纳入了4020名患者:ESTEEM在老年患者中未发现意外安全信号,两个年龄组的年复发率(ARR)均显著降低。这两项研究均表明,DMF对年龄≥50岁的RRMS患者具有良好的疗效和安全性:临床试验注册: esteem (NCT02047097)、Proclaim (NCT02525874)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Patient Satisfaction Scale Following a Laxative for Antibiotic Washout Prior to Oral Microbiome Therapy. Our Experience in Treating Infantile Hemangioma: Prognostic Factors for Relapse After Propranolol Discontinuation. Hyporesponsiveness to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents in Dialysis-Dependent Patients with Anaemia of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study. Efanesoctocog Alfa Versus Emicizumab in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors. Efanesoctocog Alfa versus Standard and Extended Half-Life Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1