Involuntary remembering and ADHD: Do individuals with ADHD symptoms experience high volumes of involuntary memories in everyday life?

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY British journal of psychology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1111/bjop.12749
John H. Mace, Assegedetch HaileMariam, Jian Zhu, Natalie Howell
{"title":"Involuntary remembering and ADHD: Do individuals with ADHD symptoms experience high volumes of involuntary memories in everyday life?","authors":"John H. Mace,&nbsp;Assegedetch HaileMariam,&nbsp;Jian Zhu,&nbsp;Natalie Howell","doi":"10.1111/bjop.12749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Spontaneous mind wandering has been implicated as a feature of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and researchers have wondered if spontaneous remembering is also a feature of ADHD. In this study, we compared spontaneous cognition, principally involuntary autobiographical memories, in participants who scored inside the ADHD range on BAARS-IV to those who scored outside of the ADHD range. In Study 1, participants reported their involuntary memories and spontaneous thoughts on a laboratory measure of involuntary memory (the vigilance task), as well as estimated their daily involuntary memory frequencies on a separate questionnaire. The results showed that ADHD range participants did not differ from non-ADHD range participants in reports of involuntary memories and spontaneous thoughts on the vigilance task, but ADHD range participants estimated higher daily involuntary memory frequencies than non-ADHD range participants on the questionnaire. Additionally, on the questionnaire, ADHD participants reported that their involuntary memories were less positive and more repetitive than non-ADHD participants. In Study 2, participants recorded their naturally occurring involuntary memories in a structured diary for 48 hours. The results showed that ADHD range participants had more involuntary memories than non-ADHD range participants, and they also reported that they experienced them as less positive.</p>","PeriodicalId":9300,"journal":{"name":"British journal of psychology","volume":"116 1","pages":"216-232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjop.12749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spontaneous mind wandering has been implicated as a feature of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and researchers have wondered if spontaneous remembering is also a feature of ADHD. In this study, we compared spontaneous cognition, principally involuntary autobiographical memories, in participants who scored inside the ADHD range on BAARS-IV to those who scored outside of the ADHD range. In Study 1, participants reported their involuntary memories and spontaneous thoughts on a laboratory measure of involuntary memory (the vigilance task), as well as estimated their daily involuntary memory frequencies on a separate questionnaire. The results showed that ADHD range participants did not differ from non-ADHD range participants in reports of involuntary memories and spontaneous thoughts on the vigilance task, but ADHD range participants estimated higher daily involuntary memory frequencies than non-ADHD range participants on the questionnaire. Additionally, on the questionnaire, ADHD participants reported that their involuntary memories were less positive and more repetitive than non-ADHD participants. In Study 2, participants recorded their naturally occurring involuntary memories in a structured diary for 48 hours. The results showed that ADHD range participants had more involuntary memories than non-ADHD range participants, and they also reported that they experienced them as less positive.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非自主记忆与多动症:有多动症症状的人在日常生活中会有大量的非自主记忆吗?
自发性思维游离被认为是注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的一个特征,研究人员一直在想自发性记忆是否也是 ADHD 的一个特征。在这项研究中,我们比较了在 BAARS-IV 中得分在多动症范围内的参与者和得分在多动症范围外的参与者的自发认知,主要是非自主自传体记忆。在研究 1 中,参与者在实验室非自主记忆测量(警觉任务)中报告了他们的非自主记忆和自发想法,并在一份单独的问卷中估计了他们每天的非自主记忆频率。结果显示,在警觉任务中,多动症范围的参与者在报告非自主记忆和自发想法方面与非多动症范围的参与者没有差异,但在问卷调查中,多动症范围的参与者估计的每日非自主记忆频率高于非多动症范围的参与者。此外,与非多动症参与者相比,多动症参与者在问卷中报告的非自主记忆的积极性较低,重复性较高。在研究 2 中,参与者在 48 小时的结构化日记中记录了他们自然产生的非自主记忆。结果显示,与非多动症参与者相比,多动症参与者有更多的非自主记忆,而且他们还报告说,他们的非自主记忆不那么积极。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British journal of psychology
British journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychology publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognition; health and clinical psychology; developmental, social and occupational psychology. For information on specific requirements, please view Notes for Contributors. We attract a large number of international submissions each year which make major contributions across the range of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Effects of emotional variability on social evaluations of faces: An advantage of low variability. Testing the impact of fallacies and contrarian claims in climate change misinformation. Economic inequality fosters unethical behaviour by promoting the perception of immoral and competitive normative climates. Trust learning in the repeated trust game: A meta-analytic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1