Comparison of Phosphate and Bicarbonate Buffer Solutions as Dissolution Test Media for Predicting Bioequivalence of Febuxostat Formulation.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1248/cpb.c24-00526
Masaki Higashino, Kiyohiko Sugano
{"title":"Comparison of Phosphate and Bicarbonate Buffer Solutions as Dissolution Test Media for Predicting Bioequivalence of Febuxostat Formulation.","authors":"Masaki Higashino, Kiyohiko Sugano","doi":"10.1248/cpb.c24-00526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the present study was to compare phosphate buffer (PPB) and bicarbonate buffer (BCB) solutions as dissolution test media for predicting the bioequivalence (BE) of an immediate-release (IR) formulation. Febuxostat was used as a model of free acid drugs. One reference formulation (RF) and three test formulations (TF) were employed in this study. The clinical BE studies involved 18 to 24 healthy adult volunteers. Each formulation was orally administered in the fasted state. The compendial paddle apparatus was used for the dissolution tests (500 mL, 37 °C, 25 or 50 rpm). BCB (10 mM, pH 6.8, 140 mM NaCl) and PPB (2.5 to 25 mM, pH 6.8, 140 mM NaCl) were used as dissolution media. The pH value of BCB was maintained by the floating lid method. In the clinical BE studies, two TFs were BE to RF, whereas one TF was non-BE. At a paddle speed of 50 rpm, RF and TFs showed little or no difference in the dissolution profiles in all buffer solutions. At 25 rpm, the dissolution profiles in 2.5 mM PPB and 10 mM BCB were consistent with the clinical BE results. The in vitro-in vivo correlation between C<sub>max</sub> ratio and dissolved% ratio at each time point was highest for 10 mM BCB at 25 rpm. These results suggest that the use of BCB increases the BE predictability of dissolution tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":9773,"journal":{"name":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":"72 11","pages":"989-995"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c24-00526","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare phosphate buffer (PPB) and bicarbonate buffer (BCB) solutions as dissolution test media for predicting the bioequivalence (BE) of an immediate-release (IR) formulation. Febuxostat was used as a model of free acid drugs. One reference formulation (RF) and three test formulations (TF) were employed in this study. The clinical BE studies involved 18 to 24 healthy adult volunteers. Each formulation was orally administered in the fasted state. The compendial paddle apparatus was used for the dissolution tests (500 mL, 37 °C, 25 or 50 rpm). BCB (10 mM, pH 6.8, 140 mM NaCl) and PPB (2.5 to 25 mM, pH 6.8, 140 mM NaCl) were used as dissolution media. The pH value of BCB was maintained by the floating lid method. In the clinical BE studies, two TFs were BE to RF, whereas one TF was non-BE. At a paddle speed of 50 rpm, RF and TFs showed little or no difference in the dissolution profiles in all buffer solutions. At 25 rpm, the dissolution profiles in 2.5 mM PPB and 10 mM BCB were consistent with the clinical BE results. The in vitro-in vivo correlation between Cmax ratio and dissolved% ratio at each time point was highest for 10 mM BCB at 25 rpm. These results suggest that the use of BCB increases the BE predictability of dissolution tests.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较磷酸盐缓冲溶液和碳酸氢盐缓冲溶液作为预测非布索坦制剂生物等效性的溶出试验介质
本研究旨在比较磷酸盐缓冲液(PPB)和碳酸氢盐缓冲液(BCB)作为溶出度测试介质,以预测速释(IR)制剂的生物等效性(BE)。非布索坦被用作游离酸药物的模型。本研究采用了一个参考制剂(RF)和三个试验制剂(TF)。18至24名健康成年志愿者参与了临床BE研究。每种配方均在空腹状态下口服。溶解试验采用药典规定的桨式仪器(500 mL、37 °C、25 或 50 rpm)。溶解介质为 BCB(10 mM,pH 6.8,140 mM NaCl)和 PPB(2.5 至 25 mM,pH 6.8,140 mM NaCl)。BCB 的 pH 值通过浮盖法保持。在临床 BE 研究中,两个 TF 为 BE 至 RF,一个 TF 为非 BE。桨速为 50 转/分钟时,RF 和 TF 在所有缓冲溶液中的溶解曲线差异很小或没有差异。在 25 rpm 转速下,2.5 mM PPB 和 10 mM BCB 中的溶解曲线与临床 BE 结果一致。在 25 rpm 时,10 mM BCB 在各时间点的 Cmax 比值和溶出率之间的体外-体内相关性最高。这些结果表明,BCB 的使用提高了溶出试验的 BE 可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
132
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: The CPB covers various chemical topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields dealing with biologically active compounds, natural products, and medicines, while BPB deals with a wide range of biological topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields including scientific research from basic to clinical studies. For details of their respective scopes, please refer to the submission topic categories below. Topics: Organic chemistry In silico science Inorganic chemistry Pharmacognosy Health statistics Forensic science Biochemistry Pharmacology Pharmaceutical care and science Medicinal chemistry Analytical chemistry Physical pharmacy Natural product chemistry Toxicology Environmental science Molecular and cellular biology Biopharmacy and pharmacokinetics Pharmaceutical education Chemical biology Physical chemistry Pharmaceutical engineering Epidemiology Hygiene Regulatory science Immunology and microbiology Clinical pharmacy Miscellaneous.
期刊最新文献
Synthetic Studies on Vitamin D Derivatives with Diverse but Selective Biological Activities. Theoretical Framework for Novel Catalytic Biomolecules Composed of Multiple Peptides Two Preparation Methods for Peptide Thioester Containing Tyr(SO3H) Residue(s) without the Use of Protecting Group for Sulfate Moiety Total Synthesis of Dinorsesquiterpenoid Oxyphyllin A/Belchinoid A Evaluation of STAT3 Inhibition by Cancer Chemopreventive Trichothecenes Derived from Metabolites of Trichothecium roseum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1