Impact on clinical outcomes, surgical interventions, anaesthetic decisions and complication rates following implementation of the NICE OSA guidelines during preoperative screening.

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinical Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100266
Gabrielle Shaw, Ricki Leggatt, Paige Roberts, Amanda Peace Witton, Nicole Moll, Akshay Dwarakanath
{"title":"Impact on clinical outcomes, surgical interventions, anaesthetic decisions and complication rates following implementation of the NICE OSA guidelines during preoperative screening.","authors":"Gabrielle Shaw, Ricki Leggatt, Paige Roberts, Amanda Peace Witton, Nicole Moll, Akshay Dwarakanath","doi":"10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Unidentified OSA can lead to unexpected perioperative complications, unplanned postoperative admissions and increased length of hospital stay. The NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) recommends a rapid preoperative assessment for patients undergoing elective surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have evaluated the impact on implementing the NICE guidelines on clinical outcomes, surgical interventions, anaesthetic decisions and complication rates in surgical patients referred from the pre assessment clinic prior to an elective intervention. All patients with a clinical suspicion of OSA based on a STOP-BANG score of 3 or more were referred for an overnight oximetry. Demographics, clinical outcomes and the impact on the planned surgical procedures were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>450 patients (Age- 55 ± 14, Males- 69%, ESS- 7 ± 5) with a STOP BANG score of 3 or more underwent an overnight oximetry (32%; normal, 44%; mild, 15%; moderate and 9%; severe OSA). All moderate and severe OSA were recommended for CPAP therapy to facilitate their surgical procedures and for long term cardio-metabolic benefits. Diagnosis of moderate/severe OSA had an impact on the surgical decision (P < 0.0001, OR= 3.79, 95% CI= 2.39-6.02). Severity of OSA affected the planned anaesthetic route (P < 0.0001, OR= 3.94, 95% CI= 2.21- 7.05). No significant difference in day case v/s non-day case, need for unplanned admissions to critical care due to better planning pre procedure. CPAP was initiated preoperatively in a third of patients (mean compliance- 3.75 hours/day) and the overall complication rate was 11.6% in the moderate/severe OSA group v/s 9.6% in the normal/mild group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prevalence of OSA is high in pre surgical patients identified through preoperative screening. A diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA impacts surgical decision and planned anaesthetic route. Prior awareness of the diagnosis may help clinicians to identify the at-risk group. Timely CPAP initiation to facilitate surgery remains a challenge and despite low compliance, CPAP may reduce postoperative complications. An MDT approach and a dedicated CPAP pathway post diagnosis may help the clinicians and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10492,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"100266"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinme.2024.100266","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Unidentified OSA can lead to unexpected perioperative complications, unplanned postoperative admissions and increased length of hospital stay. The NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) recommends a rapid preoperative assessment for patients undergoing elective surgery.

Methods: We have evaluated the impact on implementing the NICE guidelines on clinical outcomes, surgical interventions, anaesthetic decisions and complication rates in surgical patients referred from the pre assessment clinic prior to an elective intervention. All patients with a clinical suspicion of OSA based on a STOP-BANG score of 3 or more were referred for an overnight oximetry. Demographics, clinical outcomes and the impact on the planned surgical procedures were evaluated.

Results: 450 patients (Age- 55 ± 14, Males- 69%, ESS- 7 ± 5) with a STOP BANG score of 3 or more underwent an overnight oximetry (32%; normal, 44%; mild, 15%; moderate and 9%; severe OSA). All moderate and severe OSA were recommended for CPAP therapy to facilitate their surgical procedures and for long term cardio-metabolic benefits. Diagnosis of moderate/severe OSA had an impact on the surgical decision (P < 0.0001, OR= 3.79, 95% CI= 2.39-6.02). Severity of OSA affected the planned anaesthetic route (P < 0.0001, OR= 3.94, 95% CI= 2.21- 7.05). No significant difference in day case v/s non-day case, need for unplanned admissions to critical care due to better planning pre procedure. CPAP was initiated preoperatively in a third of patients (mean compliance- 3.75 hours/day) and the overall complication rate was 11.6% in the moderate/severe OSA group v/s 9.6% in the normal/mild group.

Conclusion: Prevalence of OSA is high in pre surgical patients identified through preoperative screening. A diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA impacts surgical decision and planned anaesthetic route. Prior awareness of the diagnosis may help clinicians to identify the at-risk group. Timely CPAP initiation to facilitate surgery remains a challenge and despite low compliance, CPAP may reduce postoperative complications. An MDT approach and a dedicated CPAP pathway post diagnosis may help the clinicians and patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在术前筛查期间实施 NICE OSA 指南后对临床结果、手术干预、麻醉决策和并发症发生率的影响。
导言:不明原因的 OSA 可导致意想不到的围手术期并发症、非计划性术后入院和住院时间延长。NICE(美国国家临床优化研究所)建议对接受择期手术的患者进行快速术前评估:我们评估了实施 NICE 指南对择期手术前评估诊所转诊的手术患者的临床效果、手术干预、麻醉决定和并发症发生率的影响。所有根据 STOP-BANG 评分 3 分或 3 分以上临床怀疑患有 OSA 的患者均被转诊接受过夜血氧监测。对人口统计学、临床结果以及对计划手术的影响进行了评估:450 名 STOP-BANG 评分为 3 分或 3 分以上的患者(年龄- 55 ± 14,男性- 69%,ESS- 7 ± 5)接受了隔夜血氧测定(32%;正常,44%;轻度,15%;中度和 9%;重度 OSA)。所有中度和重度 OSA 患者都被建议接受 CPAP 治疗,以方便他们进行手术,并获得长期的心血管代谢益处。中度/重度 OSA 的诊断对手术决定有影响(P < 0.0001,OR= 3.79,95% CI=2.39-6.02)。OSA 的严重程度会影响计划的麻醉路径(P < 0.0001,OR= 3.94,95% CI= 2.21-7.05)。日间病例与非日间病例之间无明显差异,由于术前计划更周密,因此无须意外入住重症监护室。中度/重度 OSA 组的总体并发症发生率为 11.6%,而正常/轻度组为 9.6%:结论:通过术前筛查发现的手术前患者中,OSA 的患病率很高。中度至重度 OSA 的诊断会影响手术决策和计划的麻醉路径。事先了解诊断结果有助于临床医生识别高危人群。及时启动 CPAP 以促进手术仍是一项挑战,尽管依从性较低,但 CPAP 可减少术后并发症。MDT 方法和 CPAP 诊断后的专用路径可能会对临床医生和患者有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Medicine
Clinical Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Medicine is aimed at practising physicians in the UK and overseas and has relevance to all those managing or working within the healthcare sector. Available in print and online, the journal seeks to encourage high standards of medical care by promoting good clinical practice through original research, review and comment. The journal also includes a dedicated continuing medical education (CME) section in each issue. This presents the latest advances in a chosen specialty, with self-assessment questions at the end of each topic enabling CPD accreditation to be acquired. ISSN: 1470-2118 E-ISSN: 1473-4893 Frequency: 6 issues per year
期刊最新文献
Impact on clinical outcomes, surgical interventions, anaesthetic decisions and complication rates following implementation of the NICE OSA guidelines during preoperative screening. Thromboelastography for Rapid Diagnosis of Heparin-Like Anticoagulant Release During Anaphylaxis-Induced Coagulopathy in Systemic Mastocytosis: A Case Report. The feasibility of a novel national Quality Improvement programme for Tobacco Dependency Treatment Pathways in acute UK hospitals. Key concepts in diagnosing infection - when to treat and when not to. Diabetic Ketoacidosis and Hyperglycemic Hyperosmolar Syndrome in Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1