Poor sleep quality is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective cohort study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Sleep Research Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1111/jsr.14411
Meiling Cai, Fei Jiang, Lingyu Lin, Yanchun Peng, Sailan Li, Liangwan Chen, Yanjuan Lin
{"title":"Poor sleep quality is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective cohort study.","authors":"Meiling Cai, Fei Jiang, Lingyu Lin, Yanchun Peng, Sailan Li, Liangwan Chen, Yanjuan Lin","doi":"10.1111/jsr.14411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The decrease in sleep quality leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and is closely related to the prognosis of various diseases. However, the relationship between preoperative sleep quality and postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection is still unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between sleep quality and the clinical outcomes of acute aortic dissection. We assessed participants' sleep quality and the clinical outcomes of acute aortic dissection, which included prolonged mechanical ventilation, postoperative delirium, in-hospital death, continuous renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit stay time, and length of stay. Patients were divided into good sleep quality group (n = 103) and poor sleep quality group (n = 113). Postoperative delirium, in-hospital death, prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay time were significantly increased in the poor sleep quality group when compared with the good sleep quality group (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the poorer sleep quality, the greater the risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio = 3.451, 95% confidence interval 1.19-10.004) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (odds ratio = 6.302, 95% confidence interval 3.105-12.791), and the longer intensive care unit stay time (β = 62.37, 95% confidence interval 22.411-102.329). In addition, the higher the incidence of smoking history (odds ratio = 7.417, 95% confidence interval 2.425-22.684), poor sleep quality (odds ratio = 11.59, 95% confidence interval 3.844-34.942) and postoperative delirium (odds ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.793-14.504), the greater the risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Our findings revealed that poor sleep quality may be a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes of acute aortic dissection. Rapid assessment of self-reported sleep quality may be a simple and effective way to identify patients with acute aortic dissection who are at high risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sleep Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14411"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sleep Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.14411","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decrease in sleep quality leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and is closely related to the prognosis of various diseases. However, the relationship between preoperative sleep quality and postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection is still unclear. We aimed to assess the relationship between sleep quality and the clinical outcomes of acute aortic dissection. We assessed participants' sleep quality and the clinical outcomes of acute aortic dissection, which included prolonged mechanical ventilation, postoperative delirium, in-hospital death, continuous renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit stay time, and length of stay. Patients were divided into good sleep quality group (n = 103) and poor sleep quality group (n = 113). Postoperative delirium, in-hospital death, prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit stay time were significantly increased in the poor sleep quality group when compared with the good sleep quality group (p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the poorer sleep quality, the greater the risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio = 3.451, 95% confidence interval 1.19-10.004) and prolonged mechanical ventilation (odds ratio = 6.302, 95% confidence interval 3.105-12.791), and the longer intensive care unit stay time (β = 62.37, 95% confidence interval 22.411-102.329). In addition, the higher the incidence of smoking history (odds ratio = 7.417, 95% confidence interval 2.425-22.684), poor sleep quality (odds ratio = 11.59, 95% confidence interval 3.844-34.942) and postoperative delirium (odds ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.793-14.504), the greater the risk of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Our findings revealed that poor sleep quality may be a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes of acute aortic dissection. Rapid assessment of self-reported sleep quality may be a simple and effective way to identify patients with acute aortic dissection who are at high risk for prolonged mechanical ventilation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠质量差是急性主动脉夹层患者出现不良临床结果的风险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
睡眠质量下降会导致心血管疾病风险增加,并与各种疾病的预后密切相关。然而,急性主动脉夹层患者术前睡眠质量与术后临床预后之间的关系仍不明确。我们旨在评估睡眠质量与急性主动脉夹层临床预后之间的关系。我们评估了参与者的睡眠质量和急性主动脉夹层的临床结局,包括机械通气时间延长、术后谵妄、院内死亡、持续肾脏替代治疗、重症监护室住院时间和住院时间。患者被分为睡眠质量好组(103 人)和睡眠质量差组(113 人)。与睡眠质量良好组相比,睡眠质量差组的术后谵妄、院内死亡、机械通气时间延长和重症监护室住院时间明显增加(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sleep Research
Journal of Sleep Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.80%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sleep Research is dedicated to basic and clinical sleep research. The Journal publishes original research papers and invited reviews in all areas of sleep research (including biological rhythms). The Journal aims to promote the exchange of ideas between basic and clinical sleep researchers coming from a wide range of backgrounds and disciplines. The Journal will achieve this by publishing papers which use multidisciplinary and novel approaches to answer important questions about sleep, as well as its disorders and the treatment thereof.
期刊最新文献
Poor sleep quality is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in patients with acute aortic dissection: A prospective cohort study. Pilot analysis of magnetic resonance imaging-based contributors to patient-centred optimization of mandibular advancement devices in obstructive sleep apnea. Differential effects of sleep position and sleep stage on the severity of obstructive sleep apnea. Sex-specific changes in sleep quality with aging: Insights from wearable device analysis. The efficacy and safety of dual orexin receptor antagonists in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1