Validation guidelines for drug-target prediction methods.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1080/17460441.2024.2430955
Ziaurrehman Tanoli, Aron Schulman, Tero Aittokallio
{"title":"Validation guidelines for drug-target prediction methods.","authors":"Ziaurrehman Tanoli, Aron Schulman, Tero Aittokallio","doi":"10.1080/17460441.2024.2430955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mapping the interactions between pharmaceutical compounds and their molecular targets is a fundamental aspect of drug discovery and repurposing. Drug-target interactions are important for elucidating mechanisms of action and optimizing drug efficacy and safety profiles. Several computational methods have been developed to systematically predict drug-target interactions. However, computational and experimental validation of the drug-target predictions greatly vary across the studies.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Through a PubMed query, a corpus comprising 3,286 articles on drug-target interaction prediction published within the past decade was covered. Natural language processing was used for automated abstract classification to study the evolution of computational methods, validation strategies and performance assessment metrics in the 3,286 articles. Additionally, a manual analysis of 259 studies that performed experimental validation of computational predictions revealed prevalent experimental protocols.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Starting from 2014, there has been a noticeable increase in articles focusing on drug-target interaction prediction. Docking and regression stands out as the most commonly used techniques among computational methods, and cross-validation is frequently employed as the computational validation strategy. Testing the predictions using multiple, orthogonal validation strategies is recommended and should be reported for the specific target prediction applications. Experimental validation remains relatively rare and should be performed more routinely to evaluate biological relevance of predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12267,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2024.2430955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Mapping the interactions between pharmaceutical compounds and their molecular targets is a fundamental aspect of drug discovery and repurposing. Drug-target interactions are important for elucidating mechanisms of action and optimizing drug efficacy and safety profiles. Several computational methods have been developed to systematically predict drug-target interactions. However, computational and experimental validation of the drug-target predictions greatly vary across the studies.

Areas covered: Through a PubMed query, a corpus comprising 3,286 articles on drug-target interaction prediction published within the past decade was covered. Natural language processing was used for automated abstract classification to study the evolution of computational methods, validation strategies and performance assessment metrics in the 3,286 articles. Additionally, a manual analysis of 259 studies that performed experimental validation of computational predictions revealed prevalent experimental protocols.

Expert opinion: Starting from 2014, there has been a noticeable increase in articles focusing on drug-target interaction prediction. Docking and regression stands out as the most commonly used techniques among computational methods, and cross-validation is frequently employed as the computational validation strategy. Testing the predictions using multiple, orthogonal validation strategies is recommended and should be reported for the specific target prediction applications. Experimental validation remains relatively rare and should be performed more routinely to evaluate biological relevance of predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物靶点预测方法的验证指南。
简介绘制药物化合物与其分子靶点之间的相互作用图是药物发现和再利用的一个基本方面。药物与靶点之间的相互作用对于阐明药物作用机制、优化药物疗效和安全性非常重要。目前已开发出多种计算方法来系统预测药物与靶点的相互作用。然而,不同研究对药物-靶点预测的计算和实验验证却大相径庭:通过 PubMed 查询,涵盖了过去十年间发表的 3286 篇关于药物-靶点相互作用预测的文章。通过自然语言处理进行自动摘要分类,研究了 3286 篇文章中计算方法、验证策略和性能评估指标的演变。此外,还对259篇对计算预测进行实验验证的研究进行了人工分析,发现了普遍的实验方案:从2014年开始,关注药物与靶点相互作用预测的文章明显增多。在各种计算方法中,对接和回归是最常用的技术,交叉验证经常被用作计算验证策略。建议使用多种正交验证策略测试预测结果,并应针对具体的靶标预测应用进行报告。实验验证仍然相对较少,应更经常地进行实验验证,以评估预测的生物学相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
78
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (ISSN 1746-0441 [print], 1746-045X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on novel technologies involved in the drug discovery process, leading to new leads and reduced attrition rates. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the scope for future development. The Editors welcome: Reviews covering chemoinformatics; bioinformatics; assay development; novel screening technologies; in vitro/in vivo models; structure-based drug design; systems biology Drug Case Histories examining the steps involved in the preclinical and clinical development of a particular drug The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and pharmaceutical industry, academic pharmaceutical scientists and other closely related professionals looking to enhance the success of their drug candidates through optimisation at the preclinical level.
期刊最新文献
Validation guidelines for drug-target prediction methods. Correction. Data-centric challenges with the application and adoption of artificial intelligence for drug discovery. Innovative strategies for the discovery of new drugs against alopecia areata: taking aim at the immune system. Scaffold hopping approaches for dual-target antitumor drug discovery: opportunities and challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1