Yasser H Hadi, Lauren Keaney, Andrew England, Niamh Moore, Mark McEntee
{"title":"Automatic patient centering in computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yasser H Hadi, Lauren Keaney, Andrew England, Niamh Moore, Mark McEntee","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11170-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively examine the influence of auto-patient centering technologies on positioning accuracy, radiation dose, image quality, and time efficiency of computed tomography (CT) scans.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of peer-reviewed English publications was performed between January 2000 and November 2023 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two postgraduate students and an academic lecturer independently reviewed the articles to verify adherence to the inclusion criteria. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to evaluate study quality. We derived summary estimates on positioning accuracy, radiation dose reduction, image quality, and time efficiency using proportion and meta-analysis methodologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were identified comparing automatic and manual CT positioning. Automatic positioning improved accuracy by reducing vertical offsets to 7 mm and 4 mm for thorax and abdominal CTs, compared to 19 mm and 18 mm with manual methods. Most studies showed significant reductions in radiation dose, ranging from 5.71 to 31%. Image quality results were mixed, automatic methods generally produced images with less noise, but differences were minimal. Time efficiency was better, with automatic positioning reducing preparation time from 0.48 min versus 0.67 min for manual positioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review confirms that automatic patient-centering technologies enhance positioning accuracy and decrease preparation times in CT scans. While reductions in radiation doses and some improvements in image quality were observed, the evidence remains mixed. Findings support integrating these technologies into clinical practice to optimize patient care.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Does automatic patient centering in CT enhance positioning accuracy, reduce radiation exposure, and improve image quality? Findings Findings indicate that automatic centering can optimize image quality, reduce examination times and contribute to overall improvements in imaging efficiency. Clinical relevance Automatic patient centering in CT improves positioning accuracy, minimizes radiation exposure, enhances image quality, and accelerates imaging workflows, contributing to safer, more efficient imaging procedures that benefit patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11170-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To comprehensively examine the influence of auto-patient centering technologies on positioning accuracy, radiation dose, image quality, and time efficiency of computed tomography (CT) scans.
Materials and methods: A systematic search of peer-reviewed English publications was performed between January 2000 and November 2023 in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two postgraduate students and an academic lecturer independently reviewed the articles to verify adherence to the inclusion criteria. The QUADAS-2 tool was employed to evaluate study quality. We derived summary estimates on positioning accuracy, radiation dose reduction, image quality, and time efficiency using proportion and meta-analysis methodologies.
Results: Nine studies were identified comparing automatic and manual CT positioning. Automatic positioning improved accuracy by reducing vertical offsets to 7 mm and 4 mm for thorax and abdominal CTs, compared to 19 mm and 18 mm with manual methods. Most studies showed significant reductions in radiation dose, ranging from 5.71 to 31%. Image quality results were mixed, automatic methods generally produced images with less noise, but differences were minimal. Time efficiency was better, with automatic positioning reducing preparation time from 0.48 min versus 0.67 min for manual positioning.
Conclusions: This review confirms that automatic patient-centering technologies enhance positioning accuracy and decrease preparation times in CT scans. While reductions in radiation doses and some improvements in image quality were observed, the evidence remains mixed. Findings support integrating these technologies into clinical practice to optimize patient care.
Key points: Question Does automatic patient centering in CT enhance positioning accuracy, reduce radiation exposure, and improve image quality? Findings Findings indicate that automatic centering can optimize image quality, reduce examination times and contribute to overall improvements in imaging efficiency. Clinical relevance Automatic patient centering in CT improves positioning accuracy, minimizes radiation exposure, enhances image quality, and accelerates imaging workflows, contributing to safer, more efficient imaging procedures that benefit patient care.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.