Predicting the use of sugar and caffeine as countermeasures to sleepiness in London bus drivers.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Industrial Health Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.2486/indhealth.2024-0138
Fran Pilkington-Cheney, Ashleigh Filtness, Cheryl Haslam, Karl A Miller
{"title":"Predicting the use of sugar and caffeine as countermeasures to sleepiness in London bus drivers.","authors":"Fran Pilkington-Cheney, Ashleigh Filtness, Cheryl Haslam, Karl A Miller","doi":"10.2486/indhealth.2024-0138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sleepiness is a significant workplace safety hazard and prevalent in shift workers including bus drivers. Several aspects of professional driving can result in shortened sleep and increased sleepiness, which has the potential to result in workplace injuries, incidents and crashes. Caffeine is an effective sleepiness countermeasure; however, private and professional drivers also report using potentially ineffective countermeasures such as sugar. By identifying factors which predict use of specific countermeasures (e.g., sugar, caffeine), educational initiatives could be targeted towards encouraging effective use. A subset of data was analysed from a driver sleepiness survey with London bus drivers (n=1,335). Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors separately predicted use of sugar (n=238) or caffeine (n=238) as a sleepiness countermeasure. Being female, having higher self-reported sleep quality and waking indexes and actively doing something to stay awake were predictive of sugar use. Age, sleeping pill use and actively doing something to stay awake were the strongest predictors of caffeine. However, many predictors from the univariate analyses were the same for both sugar and caffeine. Although tailored initiatives could be developed, broader education relating to managing sleepiness should be implemented for all bus drivers to encourage effective countermeasure use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13531,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.2024-0138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sleepiness is a significant workplace safety hazard and prevalent in shift workers including bus drivers. Several aspects of professional driving can result in shortened sleep and increased sleepiness, which has the potential to result in workplace injuries, incidents and crashes. Caffeine is an effective sleepiness countermeasure; however, private and professional drivers also report using potentially ineffective countermeasures such as sugar. By identifying factors which predict use of specific countermeasures (e.g., sugar, caffeine), educational initiatives could be targeted towards encouraging effective use. A subset of data was analysed from a driver sleepiness survey with London bus drivers (n=1,335). Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to determine which factors separately predicted use of sugar (n=238) or caffeine (n=238) as a sleepiness countermeasure. Being female, having higher self-reported sleep quality and waking indexes and actively doing something to stay awake were predictive of sugar use. Age, sleeping pill use and actively doing something to stay awake were the strongest predictors of caffeine. However, many predictors from the univariate analyses were the same for both sugar and caffeine. Although tailored initiatives could be developed, broader education relating to managing sleepiness should be implemented for all bus drivers to encourage effective countermeasure use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测伦敦公交车司机使用糖和咖啡因来缓解困倦的情况。
嗜睡是工作场所的重大安全隐患,在包括巴士司机在内的轮班工人中普遍存在。职业驾驶的几个方面会导致睡眠时间缩短和嗜睡程度增加,从而有可能造成工伤、事故和撞车。咖啡因是一种有效的嗜睡对策;然而,私人和职业驾驶员也报告说,他们使用糖等可能无效的对策。通过确定预测使用特定对策(如糖、咖啡因)的因素,可以有针对性地开展教育活动,鼓励有效使用对策。我们对伦敦公交车司机(人数=1335)的驾驶员困倦调查数据进行了分析。我们进行了单变量和多变量逻辑回归,以确定哪些因素可分别预测糖(样本数=238)或咖啡因(样本数=238)作为嗜睡对策的使用情况。女性、自我报告的睡眠质量和觉醒指数较高以及积极采取行动保持清醒是使用糖的预测因素。年龄、服用安眠药和积极采取行动保持清醒是预测咖啡因使用的最有力因素。然而,单变量分析中的许多预测因素对于糖和咖啡因都是相同的。尽管可以制定有针对性的措施,但还是应该对所有公交车司机开展更广泛的有关控制睡意的教育,以鼓励他们有效使用对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial Health
Industrial Health 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: INDUSTRIAL HEALTH covers all aspects of occupational medicine, ergonomics, industrial hygiene, engineering, safety and policy sciences. The journal helps promote solutions for the control and improvement of working conditions, and for the application of valuable research findings to the actual working environment.
期刊最新文献
Predicting the use of sugar and caffeine as countermeasures to sleepiness in London bus drivers. Long-term impact of being bullied at school on job satisfaction among middle-aged workers: findings from a 50-year prospective study of the 1958 British Birth Cohort. Workload management measures for supporting nuclear industry main control room operators and emergency response organization personnel during crises-a scoping review. Subsequent development of cholangiocarcinoma caused by exposure to 1,2-dichloropropane and/or dichloromethane in the printing company in Osaka, Japan. A framework for countermeasures design to support professional drivers' fitness-to-drive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1