Postoperative Opioid Reduction Using a Multimodal Pain Protocol for Outpatient Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgery.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-19 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241255353
Ethan M Bernstein, J Preston Van Buren, Kieran S M Wolf, Addison G Cantor, Wei Wei Wu, James R Bailey, Jennifer L Smith
{"title":"Postoperative Opioid Reduction Using a Multimodal Pain Protocol for Outpatient Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgery.","authors":"Ethan M Bernstein, J Preston Van Buren, Kieran S M Wolf, Addison G Cantor, Wei Wei Wu, James R Bailey, Jennifer L Smith","doi":"10.1177/23259671241255353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orthopaedic surgery regularly employs opioids for postoperative pain management. Multimodal pain protocols have been shown to reduce opioid prescriptions in orthopaedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze the impact of a division-level multimodal pain protocol for orthopaedic sports medicine surgery on opioid prescription reduction and pain level postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All orthopaedic sports medicine procedures at a military treatment facility were categorized into 1 of 3 pain tiers. A pain protocol emphasizing multimodal pain control was implemented for each tier. A retrospective cohort study compared pre- and postprotocol pain groups for each respective tier (n = 40 in each) for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores 2 weeks postoperatively, postoperative opioid prescription, and time to discontinuation of postoperative opioids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of opioid pills prescribed for all tiers decreased by 43.6% (preprotocol 35.7 ± 3.1; postprotocol 20.1 ± 1.5; <i>P</i> < .0001) after pain protocol implementation. Of the total opioids prescribed in the postprotocol cohort, a mean of 64.1% were consumed. There was no significant difference in overall visual analog scale for pain scores at 2 weeks postoperatively (preprotocol 2.72 ± 0.41; postprotocol 2.99 ± 0.43; <i>P</i> = .40). At 2 weeks postoperatively, only 1 patient continued opioids in the postprotocol group compared with 20 patients with continued opioid use in the preprotocol group (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A division-level multimodal pain protocol applied to orthopaedic sports medicine procedures led to decreased opioid prescription postoperatively with no significant difference in 2-week postoperative pain scores compared with more opioid reliant and variable protocols in a cohort of military service members. Despite the reduced prescription, patients consumed a mean of 64.1% of pills, indicating continued overprescription.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241255353"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241255353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic surgery regularly employs opioids for postoperative pain management. Multimodal pain protocols have been shown to reduce opioid prescriptions in orthopaedic surgery.

Purpose: To analyze the impact of a division-level multimodal pain protocol for orthopaedic sports medicine surgery on opioid prescription reduction and pain level postoperatively.

Study design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: All orthopaedic sports medicine procedures at a military treatment facility were categorized into 1 of 3 pain tiers. A pain protocol emphasizing multimodal pain control was implemented for each tier. A retrospective cohort study compared pre- and postprotocol pain groups for each respective tier (n = 40 in each) for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores 2 weeks postoperatively, postoperative opioid prescription, and time to discontinuation of postoperative opioids.

Results: The mean number of opioid pills prescribed for all tiers decreased by 43.6% (preprotocol 35.7 ± 3.1; postprotocol 20.1 ± 1.5; P < .0001) after pain protocol implementation. Of the total opioids prescribed in the postprotocol cohort, a mean of 64.1% were consumed. There was no significant difference in overall visual analog scale for pain scores at 2 weeks postoperatively (preprotocol 2.72 ± 0.41; postprotocol 2.99 ± 0.43; P = .40). At 2 weeks postoperatively, only 1 patient continued opioids in the postprotocol group compared with 20 patients with continued opioid use in the preprotocol group (P < .001).

Conclusion: A division-level multimodal pain protocol applied to orthopaedic sports medicine procedures led to decreased opioid prescription postoperatively with no significant difference in 2-week postoperative pain scores compared with more opioid reliant and variable protocols in a cohort of military service members. Despite the reduced prescription, patients consumed a mean of 64.1% of pills, indicating continued overprescription.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在运动医学骨科门诊手术中采用多模式疼痛治疗方案减少术后阿片类药物用量。
背景:骨科手术经常使用阿片类药物进行术后疼痛治疗。研究设计:队列研究;证据级别:3:研究设计:队列研究;证据级别:3:研究设计:队列研究;证据等级:3.方法:将一家军事治疗机构的所有运动医学矫形手术分为 3 个疼痛等级中的 1 个。每个等级都实施了强调多模式疼痛控制的疼痛治疗方案。一项回顾性队列研究比较了术后 2 周视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、术后阿片类药物处方以及术后停用阿片类药物的时间:结果:疼痛治疗方案实施后,所有级别的阿片类药物平均处方量减少了 43.6%(方案前 35.7 ± 3.1;方案后 20.1 ± 1.5;P < .0001)。在协议实施后的组群中,阿片类药物处方总量的平均消耗率为 64.1%。术后 2 周的总体疼痛视觉模拟量表评分无明显差异(协议前 2.72 ± 0.41;协议后 2.99 ± 0.43;P = .40)。术后2周时,协议后组只有1名患者继续使用阿片类药物,而协议前组有20名患者继续使用阿片类药物(P < .001):结论:在一组军人中,在骨科运动医学手术中采用师级多模式止痛方案减少了术后阿片类药物的处方量,但术后两周的疼痛评分与更依赖阿片类药物的多变方案相比并无显著差异。尽管处方减少了,但患者平均服用了 64.1% 的药片,这表明处方仍然过量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Addition of Autograft Lateral Extra-Articular Procedures to Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Psychological Readiness in Elite Versus Nonelite Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Defining Minimal Clinically Important Difference Thresholds for Pediatric Knee Surgeries. Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Remplissage Versus Bankart Repair With Remplissage and Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation in Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability. No Postoperative Difference Between Bone-Block Versus All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1