Deciphering the COVID-19 density puzzle: A meta-analysis approach.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117485
Pratik Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar Mishra
{"title":"Deciphering the COVID-19 density puzzle: A meta-analysis approach.","authors":"Pratik Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked widespread efforts to mitigate its transmission, raising questions about the role of urban density in the spread of the virus. Understanding how city density affects the severity of communicable diseases like COVID-19 is crucial for designing sustainable, pandemic-resilient cities. However, recent studies on this issue have yielded inconsistent and conflicting results. This study addresses this gap by employing a comprehensive meta-analytic approach, synthesizing data across diverse regions and urban contexts to offer a broader, more nuanced perspective on the impact of city density. A systematic meta-analysis was conducted, initially screening 2,452 studies from Google Scholar, Scopus, and Avery Index databases (up to August 31, 2023), and narrowing down to 63 eligible studies. Using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method with a random effects model, the study accounted for variations across different studies. Statistical tests, file drawer analysis, and influence measure analysis were performed, along with assessments of heterogeneity and publication bias through forest and funnel plots. Despite this extensive analysis, the findings indicate that city density has a negligible effect on the severity of COVID-19, challenging the prevailing assumptions in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"363 ","pages":"117485"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has sparked widespread efforts to mitigate its transmission, raising questions about the role of urban density in the spread of the virus. Understanding how city density affects the severity of communicable diseases like COVID-19 is crucial for designing sustainable, pandemic-resilient cities. However, recent studies on this issue have yielded inconsistent and conflicting results. This study addresses this gap by employing a comprehensive meta-analytic approach, synthesizing data across diverse regions and urban contexts to offer a broader, more nuanced perspective on the impact of city density. A systematic meta-analysis was conducted, initially screening 2,452 studies from Google Scholar, Scopus, and Avery Index databases (up to August 31, 2023), and narrowing down to 63 eligible studies. Using the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method with a random effects model, the study accounted for variations across different studies. Statistical tests, file drawer analysis, and influence measure analysis were performed, along with assessments of heterogeneity and publication bias through forest and funnel plots. Despite this extensive analysis, the findings indicate that city density has a negligible effect on the severity of COVID-19, challenging the prevailing assumptions in the literature.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
破解 COVID-19 密度之谜:元分析方法
COVID-19 大流行引发了人们为减少病毒传播所做的广泛努力,同时也提出了城市密度在病毒传播中所起作用的问题。了解城市密度如何影响 COVID-19 等传染病的严重程度,对于设计可持续的、抗大流行的城市至关重要。然而,近期有关这一问题的研究结果并不一致且相互矛盾。本研究采用了一种全面的荟萃分析方法,综合了不同地区和城市背景下的数据,从更广泛、更细致的角度探讨了城市密度的影响,从而弥补了这一空白。我们进行了系统的荟萃分析,首先从谷歌学者、Scopus 和艾瑞索引数据库(截至 2023 年 8 月 31 日)中筛选出 2452 项研究,然后将范围缩小到 63 项符合条件的研究。研究采用随机效应模型的限制性最大似然法(REML),考虑了不同研究之间的差异。研究还进行了统计检验、文件抽屉分析和影响度量分析,并通过森林图和漏斗图评估了异质性和发表偏倚。尽管进行了大量分析,但研究结果表明,城市密度对 COVID-19 严重程度的影响微乎其微,这对文献中的普遍假设提出了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Difficult decisions and possible choices: Rare diseases, genetic inheritance and reproduction of the family. The liminal experience of awaiting for a cadaveric kidney donation: “I would not wish it on even my enemy!” Who is helping students? A qualitative analysis of task-shifting and on-campus mental health services in China's university settings. From affordable to accessible: How the pharmaceutical industry transformed patient consumers into charity recipients. An analysis of intersectional disparities in alcohol consumption in the US.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1