Risk of major vascular events in patients without traditional risk factors after transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke: An international prospective cohort.

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Stroke Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1177/23969873241300071
Shinichiro Uchiyama, Takao Hoshino, Kazuo Minematsu, Marie-Laure Meledje, Hugo Charles, Gregory W Albers, Louis R Caplan, Geoffrey A Donnan, José M Ferro, Michael G Hennerici, Carlos Molina, Peter M Rothwell, Lawrence Ks Wong, Pierre Amarenco
{"title":"Risk of major vascular events in patients without traditional risk factors after transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke: An international prospective cohort.","authors":"Shinichiro Uchiyama, Takao Hoshino, Kazuo Minematsu, Marie-Laure Meledje, Hugo Charles, Gregory W Albers, Louis R Caplan, Geoffrey A Donnan, José M Ferro, Michael G Hennerici, Carlos Molina, Peter M Rothwell, Lawrence Ks Wong, Pierre Amarenco","doi":"10.1177/23969873241300071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the clinical characteristics in patients without traditional risk factors (TRFs) after transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke, who were recruited in the TIAregistry.org.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 3847 patients were analyzed. TRFs included hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking, and atrial fibrillation. Background characteristics and outcomes at 1 and 5 years in patients without TRFs were compared to those in patients with TRFs. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular event (MACE), which was non-fatal stroke, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome, or vascular death. To evaluate the causes, we applied the ASCOD (atherosclerosis, small vessel disease, cardiac pathology, other causes or dissection) grading system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-year risk of MACE (5.3% vs 6.3%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.31) was comparable between patients without TRFs (<i>n</i> = 402) and those with TRFs (<i>n</i> = 3445). Five-year risk of MACE was significantly lower in patients without TRFs than in those with TRFs (7.9% vs 13.9%, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.82). In patients without TRFs, causal atherosclerosis was a potent risk factor (HR 5.67, 95% CI 2.68-12.02) and ipsilateral extra- or intra-cranial arterial stenosis was only significant predictor of MACE (interaction <i>p</i> = 0.0046) at 5 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and discussion: </strong>The 5-year risk of MACE was lower in patients without TRFs than those with TRFs, although a certain level of risk persisted in the absence of TRFs. The most significant predictor of MACE in patients without TRFs was arterial stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"23969873241300071"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241300071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the clinical characteristics in patients without traditional risk factors (TRFs) after transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke, who were recruited in the TIAregistry.org.

Patients and methods: A total of 3847 patients were analyzed. TRFs included hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, current smoking, and atrial fibrillation. Background characteristics and outcomes at 1 and 5 years in patients without TRFs were compared to those in patients with TRFs. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular event (MACE), which was non-fatal stroke, non-fatal acute coronary syndrome, or vascular death. To evaluate the causes, we applied the ASCOD (atherosclerosis, small vessel disease, cardiac pathology, other causes or dissection) grading system.

Results: One-year risk of MACE (5.3% vs 6.3%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-1.31) was comparable between patients without TRFs (n = 402) and those with TRFs (n = 3445). Five-year risk of MACE was significantly lower in patients without TRFs than in those with TRFs (7.9% vs 13.9%, HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.82). In patients without TRFs, causal atherosclerosis was a potent risk factor (HR 5.67, 95% CI 2.68-12.02) and ipsilateral extra- or intra-cranial arterial stenosis was only significant predictor of MACE (interaction p = 0.0046) at 5 years.

Conclusion and discussion: The 5-year risk of MACE was lower in patients without TRFs than those with TRFs, although a certain level of risk persisted in the absence of TRFs. The most significant predictor of MACE in patients without TRFs was arterial stenosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无传统风险因素的短暂性脑缺血发作或轻微缺血性脑卒中患者发生重大血管事件的风险:国际前瞻性队列。
导言目的:研究 TIAregistry.org 中招募的无传统危险因素(TRFs)的短暂性脑缺血发作或轻微缺血性卒中患者的临床特征:共分析了 3847 名患者。TRF包括高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症、吸烟和心房颤动。将无TRFs患者与有TRFs患者的背景特征及1年和5年后的结果进行了比较。主要结果是主要心血管事件(MACE),即非致死性中风、非致死性急性冠状动脉综合征或血管性死亡。为了评估病因,我们采用了 ASCOD(动脉粥样硬化、小血管疾病、心脏病理、其他原因或夹层)分级系统:没有TRF的患者(n = 402)和有TRF的患者(n = 3445)一年的MACE风险(5.3% vs 6.3%,危险比(HR)0.84,95%置信区间(CI)0.53-1.31)相当。无TRFs患者的五年MACE风险明显低于TRFs患者(7.9% vs 13.9%,HR 0.57,95% CI 0.39-0.82)。在无TRFs的患者中,因动脉粥样硬化是一个强有力的风险因素(HR 5.67,95% CI 2.68-12.02),同侧颅外或颅内动脉狭窄是5年后MACE的唯一重要预测因素(交互作用P = 0.0046):无TRFs患者的5年MACE风险低于有TRFs的患者,尽管在无TRFs的情况下仍存在一定程度的风险。动脉狭窄是预测无TRF患者MACE的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
期刊最新文献
Risk of major vascular events in patients without traditional risk factors after transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke: An international prospective cohort. Stroke thrombectomy in the elderly: A propensity score matched study on a nationwide real-world registry. Circulating collagen breakdown products as a biomarker for presence and instability of human intracranial aneurysms. Incident dementia in ischaemic stroke patients with early cardiac complications: A propensity-score matched cohort study. Comparing the properties of traditional and novel approaches to the modified Rankin scale: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1