Longitudinal analysis of blood pressure control and influencing factors among 32 701 primary care hypertensive patients with or without diabetes: a prospective cohort study in Jianye District, China.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Health Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1093/inthealth/ihae082
Xia Zhang, Na Jiang, Ming Zhang, Xiaoyan Ni, Lijun Fan, Wei Du, Hui Xue
{"title":"Longitudinal analysis of blood pressure control and influencing factors among 32 701 primary care hypertensive patients with or without diabetes: a prospective cohort study in Jianye District, China.","authors":"Xia Zhang, Na Jiang, Ming Zhang, Xiaoyan Ni, Lijun Fan, Wei Du, Hui Xue","doi":"10.1093/inthealth/ihae082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to explore the variation in blood pressure (BP) control in primary care hypertensive patients with or without diabetes, and investigate potential factors associated with inadequate BP control during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary care hypertensive patients with and without diabetes were recruited in 2020 from Jianye District of Nanjing and prospectively followed up until 2023. Effective BP control was measured in terms of consistent normal readings of systolic BP <140 mmHg and of diastolic BP <90 mmHg based on the most recent assessment during the follow-up period. We used the negative binomial model with total person-years as an offset to evaluate whether the study population would achieve BP control after the 3-y follow-up period in terms of rate ratio (RR) and 95% CI. We further conducted subgroup analysis based on the absence or presence of clinically confirmed diabetes and BP stability at baseline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of a total of 32 701 patients with hypertension, compared with those without comorbid diabetes and stable BP at baseline, patients with comorbid diabetes and unstable BP at baseline were less likely to have effective BP control at follow-up (adjusted RR=2.01, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.15). We observed an elevated risk of ineffective BP control at follow-up in those aged 60-70 y (1.69; 95% CI 1.56 to 1.83) or ≥70 y (1.73; 95% CI 1.59 to 1.88), females (1.09; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.16), those with a higher waist-to-height ratio (1.25; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.34), overweight/obese in terms of body mass index (1.16; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.23) or regularly consuming alcohol (1.26; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.37). Higher educational attainment indicated a reduced risk of ineffective BP control at follow-up (0.68; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Achieving effective BP control remains a persistent challenge, especially for patients with comorbid hypertension and diabetes. In the absence of any novel strategies for hypertension care, the existing multidisciplinary care approaches could be repurposed and integrated for effective management of the aforementioned comorbid conditions in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49060,"journal":{"name":"International Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihae082","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We aimed to explore the variation in blood pressure (BP) control in primary care hypertensive patients with or without diabetes, and investigate potential factors associated with inadequate BP control during follow-up.

Methods: Primary care hypertensive patients with and without diabetes were recruited in 2020 from Jianye District of Nanjing and prospectively followed up until 2023. Effective BP control was measured in terms of consistent normal readings of systolic BP <140 mmHg and of diastolic BP <90 mmHg based on the most recent assessment during the follow-up period. We used the negative binomial model with total person-years as an offset to evaluate whether the study population would achieve BP control after the 3-y follow-up period in terms of rate ratio (RR) and 95% CI. We further conducted subgroup analysis based on the absence or presence of clinically confirmed diabetes and BP stability at baseline.

Results: Of a total of 32 701 patients with hypertension, compared with those without comorbid diabetes and stable BP at baseline, patients with comorbid diabetes and unstable BP at baseline were less likely to have effective BP control at follow-up (adjusted RR=2.01, 95% CI 1.89 to 2.15). We observed an elevated risk of ineffective BP control at follow-up in those aged 60-70 y (1.69; 95% CI 1.56 to 1.83) or ≥70 y (1.73; 95% CI 1.59 to 1.88), females (1.09; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.16), those with a higher waist-to-height ratio (1.25; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.34), overweight/obese in terms of body mass index (1.16; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.23) or regularly consuming alcohol (1.26; 95% CI 1.16 to 1.37). Higher educational attainment indicated a reduced risk of ineffective BP control at follow-up (0.68; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75).

Conclusions: Achieving effective BP control remains a persistent challenge, especially for patients with comorbid hypertension and diabetes. In the absence of any novel strategies for hypertension care, the existing multidisciplinary care approaches could be repurposed and integrated for effective management of the aforementioned comorbid conditions in primary care settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国建邺区一项前瞻性队列研究:32701 例伴有或不伴有糖尿病的初级保健高血压患者血压控制及影响因素的纵向分析。
背景:我们的目的是探讨伴有或不伴有糖尿病的初级保健高血压患者血压(BP)控制的变化,并研究随访期间血压控制不足的潜在相关因素:2020年,我们从南京市建邺区招募了患有或未患有糖尿病的初级保健高血压患者,并对其进行了前瞻性随访,直至2023年。以收缩压读数是否持续正常来衡量血压是否得到有效控制:在32701名高血压患者中,与无合并糖尿病且基线血压稳定的患者相比,合并糖尿病且基线血压不稳定的患者在随访时有效控制血压的可能性较低(调整后RR=2.01,95% CI为1.89至2.15)。我们观察到,60-70 岁(1.69; 95% CI 1.56 至 1.83)或≥70 岁(1.73; 95% CI 1.59 至 1.88)、女性(1.09; 95% CI 1.03 至 1.16)、腰围较高者(1.09; 95% CI 1.03 至 1.16)、糖尿病患者(1.69; 95% CI 1.56 至 1.83)或≥70 岁(1.73; 95% CI 1.59 至 1.88)随访时血压控制无效的风险较高。16)、腰围与身高比率较高(1.25;95% CI 1.17 至 1.34)、体重指数超重/肥胖(1.16;95% CI 1.09 至 1.23)或经常饮酒(1.26;95% CI 1.16 至 1.37)。教育程度越高,随访时血压控制无效的风险越低(0.68;95% CI 0.63 至 0.75):有效控制血压仍是一项长期挑战,尤其是对于合并高血压和糖尿病的患者。在没有任何新的高血压护理策略的情况下,可以对现有的多学科护理方法进行重新定位和整合,以便在初级医疗机构中对上述合并症进行有效管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Health
International Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Health is an official journal of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It publishes original, peer-reviewed articles and reviews on all aspects of global health including the social and economic aspects of communicable and non-communicable diseases, health systems research, policy and implementation, and the evaluation of disease control programmes and healthcare delivery solutions. It aims to stimulate scientific and policy debate and provide a forum for analysis and opinion sharing for individuals and organisations engaged in all areas of global health.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal analysis of blood pressure control and influencing factors among 32 701 primary care hypertensive patients with or without diabetes: a prospective cohort study in Jianye District, China. Perception, practice and associated factors of labour pain management among obstetric care providers in public health facilities in Harari Region, Ethiopia: a multicentre cross-sectional study. Study on the influence of levels of physical activity and socio-economic conditions on body mass index of adolescents. Surgery and the first 8000 days of life: a review. Treatment-related characteristics of communities in districts characterized by persistent trachoma: an exploratory descriptive study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1