Machine Learning Identifies Clinically Distinct Phenotypes in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2024.10.019
Brototo Deb MD, MIDS , Christopher G. Scott MS , Hector I. Michelena MD, PhD , Sorin V. Pislaru MD, PhD , Vuyisile T. Nkomo MD, MPH , Garvan C. Kane MD, PhD , Juan A. Crestanello MD , Patricia A. Pellikka MD , Vidhu Anand MD
{"title":"Machine Learning Identifies Clinically Distinct Phenotypes in Patients With Aortic Regurgitation","authors":"Brototo Deb MD, MIDS ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Scott MS ,&nbsp;Hector I. Michelena MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Sorin V. Pislaru MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Vuyisile T. Nkomo MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Garvan C. Kane MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Juan A. Crestanello MD ,&nbsp;Patricia A. Pellikka MD ,&nbsp;Vidhu Anand MD","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2024.10.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a prevalent valve disease with a long latent period before symptoms appear. Recent data has suggested the role of novel markers of myocardial overload in assessing onset of decompensation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of unsupervised cluster analyses in identifying different clinical clusters, including clinical status, and a large number of echocardiographic variables including left ventricular volumes, and their associations with mortality. Patients with moderate to severe or greater chronic AR identified using echocardiography at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality censored at aortic valve surgery. Uniform manifold approximation and projection with the <em>k</em>-means algorithm was used to cluster patients using clinical and echocardiographic variables at the time of presentation. Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation by chained equations method. A supervised approach trained on the training set was used to find cluster membership in a hold-out validation set. Log-rank tests were used to assess differences in mortality rates among the clusters in both the training and validation sets.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three distinct clusters were identified among 1,100 patients (log-rank <em>P</em> for survival &lt; .001). Cluster 1 (<em>n</em> = 337), which included younger males with severe AR but fewer symptoms, showed the best survival at 75.6% (95% CI, 69.5%-82.3%). Cluster 2 (<em>n</em> = 235), including older patients and more females with elevated filling pressures, showed intermediate survival of 64.2% (95% CI, 56.8%-72.5%). Cluster 3 (<em>n</em> = 253), characterized by severe symptomatic AR, demonstrated the lowest survival of 45.3% (95% CI, 34.4%-59.8%) at 5 years. Similar clusters were identified in the internal validation cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Distinct clusters with variable echocardiographic features and mortality differences exist within patients with chronic moderate to severe or greater AR. Recognizing these clusters can refine individual risk stratification and clinical decision-making after verification in future prospective studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":"38 4","pages":"Pages 300-309"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731724005662","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a prevalent valve disease with a long latent period before symptoms appear. Recent data has suggested the role of novel markers of myocardial overload in assessing onset of decompensation.

Methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of unsupervised cluster analyses in identifying different clinical clusters, including clinical status, and a large number of echocardiographic variables including left ventricular volumes, and their associations with mortality. Patients with moderate to severe or greater chronic AR identified using echocardiography at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality censored at aortic valve surgery. Uniform manifold approximation and projection with the k-means algorithm was used to cluster patients using clinical and echocardiographic variables at the time of presentation. Missing data were imputed using the multiple imputation by chained equations method. A supervised approach trained on the training set was used to find cluster membership in a hold-out validation set. Log-rank tests were used to assess differences in mortality rates among the clusters in both the training and validation sets.

Results

Three distinct clusters were identified among 1,100 patients (log-rank P for survival < .001). Cluster 1 (n = 337), which included younger males with severe AR but fewer symptoms, showed the best survival at 75.6% (95% CI, 69.5%-82.3%). Cluster 2 (n = 235), including older patients and more females with elevated filling pressures, showed intermediate survival of 64.2% (95% CI, 56.8%-72.5%). Cluster 3 (n = 253), characterized by severe symptomatic AR, demonstrated the lowest survival of 45.3% (95% CI, 34.4%-59.8%) at 5 years. Similar clusters were identified in the internal validation cohort.

Conclusions

Distinct clusters with variable echocardiographic features and mortality differences exist within patients with chronic moderate to severe or greater AR. Recognizing these clusters can refine individual risk stratification and clinical decision-making after verification in future prospective studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习识别主动脉瓣反流患者的临床分型
背景:主动脉瓣反流(AR)是一种常见的瓣膜疾病,其症状潜伏期较长。最近的数据表明,心肌负荷过重的新标记物在评估失代偿的发生方面发挥了作用:我们试图评估无监督聚类分析在识别不同临床聚类(包括临床状态)和大量超声心动图变量(包括左心室容积)方面的作用及其与死亡率的关系。对罗切斯特梅奥诊所使用超声心动图鉴定出的≥中重度慢性 AR 患者进行了回顾性分析。主要结果是主动脉瓣手术/最后一次随访时的全因死亡率。利用K-means算法的UMAP(Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection)通过患者发病时的临床和超声心动图变量对患者进行分组。缺失数据采用链式方程多重估算法(MICE)进行估算。在训练集上训练的监督方法被用于在排除验证集中寻找群组成员。对数秩检验用于评估训练集和验证集中不同群组间死亡率的差异:结果:在 1100 名患者中发现了三个不同的群组(生存率的对数秩检验结论):慢性≥中度-重度 AR 患者中存在不同的超声心动图特征和死亡率差异。在未来的前瞻性研究中进行验证后,识别这些群组可完善个体风险分层和临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
期刊最新文献
A Second Look: Re-analysis of the PHN Marfan Trial Data to Assess the Effects of Losartan and Atenolol on Disease Progression Using Aortic Cross-sectional Area/height. Pulmonary Artery Pressure Assessment in Echocardiography: Moving Beyond RVSP and "Progressing" Back to the Mean. Sex-Specific Considerations for Mitral Valve Intervention: An Opportunity for Collaboration. Echocardiographic Reference Values for Epicardial Adipose Tissue: Insights from a Large Population-Based Study. Reclassifying Left Ventricular Diastolic Function With the 2025 ASE Guideline Versus the 2016 Algorithm.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1