Combined sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter and cerebral oximeter for predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.

0 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomolecules & biomedicine Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.17305/bb.2024.11442
Mehmet Akif Yazar, Betul Kozanhan, Yasin Tire, Nevin Sekmenli, Guzide Yazar, Murat Sevim
{"title":"Combined sonographic optic nerve sheath diameter and cerebral oximeter for predicting neurological outcome after cardiac arrest.","authors":"Mehmet Akif Yazar, Betul Kozanhan, Yasin Tire, Nevin Sekmenli, Guzide Yazar, Murat Sevim","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.11442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac arrest (CA) remains a critical global health issue with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Accurate prediction of neurological outcomes in post-CA patients is essential for optimizing management strategies. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) are emerging as promising tools for evaluating brain oxygenation and intracranial pressure. However, the potential benefits of combining these methods for improved prognostic accuracy have not been thoroughly explored. This study investigates whether the combined use of ultrasonographic ONSD and NIRS measurements enhances the prediction of neurological outcomes after CA. In this prospective study, ONSD measurements were obtained three times at 24-hour intervals, while regional hemoglobin oxygen saturation (rSO2) using NIRS was recorded twice. Neurological outcomes were assessed using the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) and Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scores for both early and late evaluations. Results indicated that 47.5% of patients had poor outcomes and 52.5% had good outcomes based on the FOUR score, while 65% had poor outcomes and 35% had good outcomes according to the CPC score. The combination of ONSD and NIRS measurements showed superior prognostic performance compared to either method alone. While standalone NIRS measurements taken after 24 hours exhibited limited predictive value, combining ONSD and NIRS provided a more reliable approach for neurological assessment in the short-term following CA. This integrated method may improve prognostic accuracy and support better clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":72398,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules & biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.11442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiac arrest (CA) remains a critical global health issue with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Accurate prediction of neurological outcomes in post-CA patients is essential for optimizing management strategies. Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) are emerging as promising tools for evaluating brain oxygenation and intracranial pressure. However, the potential benefits of combining these methods for improved prognostic accuracy have not been thoroughly explored. This study investigates whether the combined use of ultrasonographic ONSD and NIRS measurements enhances the prediction of neurological outcomes after CA. In this prospective study, ONSD measurements were obtained three times at 24-hour intervals, while regional hemoglobin oxygen saturation (rSO2) using NIRS was recorded twice. Neurological outcomes were assessed using the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) and Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scores for both early and late evaluations. Results indicated that 47.5% of patients had poor outcomes and 52.5% had good outcomes based on the FOUR score, while 65% had poor outcomes and 35% had good outcomes according to the CPC score. The combination of ONSD and NIRS measurements showed superior prognostic performance compared to either method alone. While standalone NIRS measurements taken after 24 hours exhibited limited predictive value, combining ONSD and NIRS provided a more reliable approach for neurological assessment in the short-term following CA. This integrated method may improve prognostic accuracy and support better clinical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结合超声视神经鞘直径和脑氧化仪预测心脏骤停后的神经功能预后。
心脏骤停(CA)仍然是一个严重的全球性健康问题,死亡率和发病率都很高。准确预测心脏骤停后患者的神经系统预后对于优化管理策略至关重要。视神经鞘直径(ONSD)和近红外光谱(NIRS)正在成为评估脑氧合和颅内压的有前途的工具。然而,结合使用这些方法提高预后准确性的潜在益处尚未得到深入探讨。本研究探讨了联合使用超声 ONSD 和 NIRS 测量是否能增强对 CA 后神经功能预后的预测。在这项前瞻性研究中,以 24 小时为间隔进行了三次 ONSD 测量,同时使用 NIRS 记录了两次区域血红蛋白氧饱和度 (rSO2)。在早期和晚期评估中,使用无反应全纲(FOUR)和脑功能分类(CPC)评分评估神经功能结果。结果显示,根据 FOUR 评分,47.5% 的患者疗效差,52.5% 的患者疗效好;根据 CPC 评分,65% 的患者疗效差,35% 的患者疗效好。与单独使用其中一种方法相比,ONSD 和 NIRS 测量的组合显示出更优越的预后性能。虽然 24 小时后进行的独立近红外测量的预测价值有限,但结合 ONSD 和近红外测量可为 CA 后短期内的神经评估提供更可靠的方法。这种综合方法可以提高预后的准确性,支持更好的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic effects of chlorogenic acid on allergic rhinitis through TLR4/MAPK/NF-κB pathway modulation. Silencing FOXA1 suppresses inflammation caused by LPS and promotes osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells through the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB pathway. Systemic immune-inflammation index and the short-term mortality of patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis. hUC-MSC extracellular vesicles protect against hypoxic-ischemic brain injury by promoting NLRP3 ubiquitination. N6-methyladenosine methylation regulators can serve as potential biomarkers for endometriosis related infertility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1