Determining Correlations Between Emergency Department Health Care Workers and their Associated Burnout and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scores: A Pilot Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-19 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.012
Janey Kottler, Shaveta Khosla, Parsva Shah, David Dulce, Monica J Gingell, Mitchell Kordzikowski, Steven W Nevers, David Chestek, Katherine A Maki
{"title":"Determining Correlations Between Emergency Department Health Care Workers and their Associated Burnout and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scores: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Janey Kottler, Shaveta Khosla, Parsva Shah, David Dulce, Monica J Gingell, Mitchell Kordzikowski, Steven W Nevers, David Chestek, Katherine A Maki","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health care workers experience settings that can contribute to burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder. Early identification of health care workers at risk for burnout/post-traumatic stress disorder may allow for quicker implementation of mitigation strategies despite limited research. This pilot study explores associations between burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder with demographic and occupational factors in health care workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quantitative, cross-sectional study on burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder was conducted at a single-site urban academic emergency department from 2022 to 2023. Health care workers were split into provider versus non-provider for confidentiality. Burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder were operationalized using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this cohort (n = 72), many identified as non-Hispanic white (54%) females (74%), and were non-providers (75%) who worked 32 to 40 hours/week (75%). Although not significant, non-providers reported higher disengagement (14.8% vs 0%, P = .19). Females had higher exhaustion (64.2% vs 57.9%, P = .63) while males had higher disengagement (15.8% vs 9.4%, P = .43). Participants <40 had higher disengagement and exhaustion (15.8% vs 5.9%, P = .27; 68.4% vs 55.9%, P = .27), while a previous depression diagnosis led to increased moderate-to-severe disengagement, exhaustion, and burnout (26.7% vs 6.9%, P = .05; 80.0% vs 56.9%, P = .14; and 53.3% vs 37.9%, P = .28, respectively).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Though these results are not statistically significant, we demonstrate important associations that are clinically relevant. Non-providers under 40 showed higher disengagement, which may be related to competing responsibilities, while depression increased burnout severity across all domains. Importantly, future research with increased samples will allow relevant sub-group comparisons (ie, nurses vs other non-providers) and continued exploration of factors that influence elevated burnout in health care workers.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health care workers experience settings that can contribute to burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder. Early identification of health care workers at risk for burnout/post-traumatic stress disorder may allow for quicker implementation of mitigation strategies despite limited research. This pilot study explores associations between burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder with demographic and occupational factors in health care workers.

Methods: This quantitative, cross-sectional study on burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder was conducted at a single-site urban academic emergency department from 2022 to 2023. Health care workers were split into provider versus non-provider for confidentiality. Burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder were operationalized using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder checklist.

Results: In this cohort (n = 72), many identified as non-Hispanic white (54%) females (74%), and were non-providers (75%) who worked 32 to 40 hours/week (75%). Although not significant, non-providers reported higher disengagement (14.8% vs 0%, P = .19). Females had higher exhaustion (64.2% vs 57.9%, P = .63) while males had higher disengagement (15.8% vs 9.4%, P = .43). Participants <40 had higher disengagement and exhaustion (15.8% vs 5.9%, P = .27; 68.4% vs 55.9%, P = .27), while a previous depression diagnosis led to increased moderate-to-severe disengagement, exhaustion, and burnout (26.7% vs 6.9%, P = .05; 80.0% vs 56.9%, P = .14; and 53.3% vs 37.9%, P = .28, respectively).

Discussion: Though these results are not statistically significant, we demonstrate important associations that are clinically relevant. Non-providers under 40 showed higher disengagement, which may be related to competing responsibilities, while depression increased burnout severity across all domains. Importantly, future research with increased samples will allow relevant sub-group comparisons (ie, nurses vs other non-providers) and continued exploration of factors that influence elevated burnout in health care workers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定急诊科医护人员及其相关职业倦怠和创伤后应激障碍评分之间的相关性:试点研究。
引言医护人员所处的环境可能会导致职业倦怠和创伤后应激障碍。尽管研究有限,但及早识别有职业倦怠/创伤后应激障碍风险的医护人员可以更快地实施缓解策略。本试验性研究探讨了医护人员的职业倦怠和创伤后应激障碍与人口和职业因素之间的关联:这项关于职业倦怠和创伤后应激障碍的横断面定量研究于 2022 年至 2023 年在一个单一地点的城市学术急诊科进行。为保密起见,医护人员分为医护人员和非医护人员。倦怠和创伤后应激障碍采用奥登堡倦怠量表和创伤后应激障碍核对表进行测量:在这一群体(n = 72)中,许多人被认定为非西班牙裔白人(54%)、女性(74%)、每周工作 32-40 小时的非医务人员(75%)。非医务人员的离职率较高(14.8% 对 0%,P = 0.19),但差异不大。女性的疲惫程度更高(64.2% 对 57.9%,P = .63),而男性的脱离程度更高(15.8% 对 9.4%,P = .43)。与会者讨论:尽管这些结果在统计学上并不显著,但我们证明了与临床相关的重要关联。40 岁以下的非医务人员表现出更高的脱离感,这可能与相互竞争的责任有关,而抑郁则增加了所有领域的职业倦怠严重程度。重要的是,未来的研究将增加样本数量,以便进行相关的亚组比较(即护士与其他非医务人员),并继续探索影响医护人员职业倦怠程度升高的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Determining Correlations Between Emergency Department Health Care Workers and their Associated Burnout and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Scores: A Pilot Study. Identifying Key Competencies for Ambulance Nurses in Italy: Findings from a Modified Delphi Study. Revision and Application of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory in the Emergency Department. Bibliometric Analysis on Examining Triage and Digital Triage Results in Emergency Departments. Job-Related Factors Associated with Burnout and Work Engagement in Emergency Nurses: Evidence to Inform Systems-Focused Interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1