Variation in Recommended Treatment Strategies Among American Surgeons for Actual Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury Cases.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.002
Michele N Christy, Christopher J Dy, R Glenn Gaston, Bryan J Loeffler, Mihir J Desai, Steve K Lee, Harvey Chim, Jeffrey B Friedrich, Sameer K Puri, Jason H Ko
{"title":"Variation in Recommended Treatment Strategies Among American Surgeons for Actual Adult Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury Cases.","authors":"Michele N Christy, Christopher J Dy, R Glenn Gaston, Bryan J Loeffler, Mihir J Desai, Steve K Lee, Harvey Chim, Jeffrey B Friedrich, Sameer K Puri, Jason H Ko","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The surgical management of adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) is challenging, with no consensus on optimal strategies. This study aimed to gather preferred reconstructive strategies from BPI surgeons for actual cases from a multicenter cohort to identify areas of agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four case files (history, physical examination, and imaging and electrodiagnostic testing results) were distributed to eight self-designated Level IV expert BPI surgeons in the United States. Each surgeon independently reviewed the cases and provided a preferred reconstructive plan via free text response.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For a pan-plexus case after blunt trauma (67 years old; 3 months from injury): three surgeons recommended nerve grafting upper trunk roots to distal targets. There was disagreement in shoulder reconstruction: one suggested early shoulder fusion, two preferred cranial nerve XI to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer, and two anticipated future salvage shoulder fusion. For elbow reconstruction, six surgeons preferred intercostal nerve to musculocutaneous nerve transfer. For an upper trunk injury from a motorcycle accident (33 years old; 6 months from injury), only one surgeon recommended nerve grafting, six preferred XI to SSN transfer, all recommended triceps-to-axillary transfer, and all but one favored a double fascicular transfer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is inconsistency in the use of nerve grafting for BPI patients, especially in pan-plexus injuries where options are limited. Variability exists in shoulder reconstruction and stability management, with some advocating early glenohumeral arthrodesis. Although single fascicular and triceps-to-axillary transfers are consistently favored, there is no consensus for restoring shoulder and elbow function when intraplexal transfers are unavailable.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study highlights substantial variability in surgical approaches to BPI among experts, underscoring the need for standardized treatment protocols. Understanding these diverse strategies can inform clinical decision making and help develop more uniform guidelines to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The surgical management of adult traumatic brachial plexus injuries (BPI) is challenging, with no consensus on optimal strategies. This study aimed to gather preferred reconstructive strategies from BPI surgeons for actual cases from a multicenter cohort to identify areas of agreement.

Methods: Four case files (history, physical examination, and imaging and electrodiagnostic testing results) were distributed to eight self-designated Level IV expert BPI surgeons in the United States. Each surgeon independently reviewed the cases and provided a preferred reconstructive plan via free text response.

Results: For a pan-plexus case after blunt trauma (67 years old; 3 months from injury): three surgeons recommended nerve grafting upper trunk roots to distal targets. There was disagreement in shoulder reconstruction: one suggested early shoulder fusion, two preferred cranial nerve XI to suprascapular nerve (SSN) transfer, and two anticipated future salvage shoulder fusion. For elbow reconstruction, six surgeons preferred intercostal nerve to musculocutaneous nerve transfer. For an upper trunk injury from a motorcycle accident (33 years old; 6 months from injury), only one surgeon recommended nerve grafting, six preferred XI to SSN transfer, all recommended triceps-to-axillary transfer, and all but one favored a double fascicular transfer.

Conclusions: There is inconsistency in the use of nerve grafting for BPI patients, especially in pan-plexus injuries where options are limited. Variability exists in shoulder reconstruction and stability management, with some advocating early glenohumeral arthrodesis. Although single fascicular and triceps-to-axillary transfers are consistently favored, there is no consensus for restoring shoulder and elbow function when intraplexal transfers are unavailable.

Clinical relevance: This study highlights substantial variability in surgical approaches to BPI among experts, underscoring the need for standardized treatment protocols. Understanding these diverse strategies can inform clinical decision making and help develop more uniform guidelines to improve patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国外科医生对成人创伤性臂丛神经损伤实际病例推荐治疗策略的差异。
目的:成人创伤性臂丛神经损伤(BPI)的手术治疗极具挑战性,目前尚未就最佳策略达成共识。本研究旨在收集多中心队列中臂丛神经外科医生对实际病例的首选重建策略,以确定意见一致的领域:将四份病例档案(病史、体格检查、影像学和电子诊断测试结果)分发给美国八位自行指定的四级 BPI 外科医生。每位外科医生都独立审查了病例,并通过自由文本回复提供了首选的重建方案:对于钝性创伤后的泛神经丛病例(67 岁;受伤后 3 个月):三位外科医生建议将上干根神经移植到远端目标。在肩关节重建方面存在分歧:一名外科医生建议尽早进行肩关节融合术,两名外科医生倾向于将颅神经XI转移到肩胛上神经(SSN),还有两名外科医生预计将来会进行肩关节修复融合术。在肘部重建方面,六名外科医生倾向于肋间神经转运而非肌皮神经转运。对于因摩托车事故造成的上躯干损伤(33岁;受伤6个月),只有一名外科医生建议进行神经移植,六名外科医生倾向于XI神经与SSN神经的转移,所有外科医生都建议进行肱三头肌与腋神经的转移,除了一名外科医生外,所有外科医生都倾向于进行双筋膜转移:结论:BPI患者在使用神经移植方面存在不一致,尤其是在选择有限的泛神经损伤中。在肩部重建和稳定性管理方面也存在差异,有些人主张尽早进行盂肱关节固定术。虽然单一筋膜转移和肱三头肌至腋窝转移一直受到青睐,但在无法进行复合体内转移时,如何恢复肩部和肘部功能还没有达成共识:本研究强调了专家们在 BPI 手术方法上的巨大差异,强调了标准化治疗方案的必要性。了解这些不同的策略可为临床决策提供依据,并有助于制定更统一的指南来改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Conversion of Total Wrist Arthrodesis to a Total Wrist Arthroplasty: Twelve Patients Followed for 7 (2-16) Years. Collagen and Vascular Changes in the Scapholunate Ligament Following Injury: An Immunohistochemical Study. Integrated Compression Screw Versus Unicortical Locking Screw for Fixing the Dorsal Critical Corner in Distal Radius Fractures: A Biomechanical Study. Perioperative Patient Experience in Office-Based Wide-Awake Hand Surgery. Benefits of Sensory Nerve Transfers and Risks of Using the Superficial Radial Nerve as a Donor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1