{"title":"Key considerations when implementing new diagnostic technologies in routine practice.","authors":"Jochen Lennerz","doi":"10.1007/s00292-024-01396-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The field of pathology is evolving with the integration of advanced and artificial-intelligence-powered diagnostic technologies. However, there remains a significant gap in clearly outlining the key considerations for the effective implementation of these innovations into clinical care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this review was to identify and address the essential aspects required to bridge the implementation gap of new diagnostic technologies in pathology.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This review synthesizes key elements from relevant scientific journals, organizational websites, and practical examples from pathology practice. The findings are presented as a structured framework of six key elements, supported by an infographic and illustrative cases from clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The key elements are: (1) Innovation depends more on the people driving it than on the work it demands, highlighting the importance of team collaboration and communication; (2) in-depth knowledge of the delivery system emphasizing the importance of care, IT, and administrative layers is crucial; (3) data-driven decision-making in healthcare transformation is central, with an emphasis on the process of converting real-world data (RWD) into actionable real-world evidence (RWE); (4) a proven approach for practice transformation uses a structured (utilization management strategy, UMS) framework; (5) a balanced approach toward financial sustainability, including local and systemic financial strategies, is important; and (6) ensuring safe and effective progress requires a new, collaborative definition of regulatory science, aligning innovation with regulatory oversight to support technological advancements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These key aspects offer a foundational framework for integrating new technologies into healthcare. Although not exhaustive, overlooking them would miss a significant opportunity to enhance patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":74402,"journal":{"name":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"83-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-024-01396-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The field of pathology is evolving with the integration of advanced and artificial-intelligence-powered diagnostic technologies. However, there remains a significant gap in clearly outlining the key considerations for the effective implementation of these innovations into clinical care.
Objectives: The aim of this review was to identify and address the essential aspects required to bridge the implementation gap of new diagnostic technologies in pathology.
Material and methods: This review synthesizes key elements from relevant scientific journals, organizational websites, and practical examples from pathology practice. The findings are presented as a structured framework of six key elements, supported by an infographic and illustrative cases from clinical settings.
Results: The key elements are: (1) Innovation depends more on the people driving it than on the work it demands, highlighting the importance of team collaboration and communication; (2) in-depth knowledge of the delivery system emphasizing the importance of care, IT, and administrative layers is crucial; (3) data-driven decision-making in healthcare transformation is central, with an emphasis on the process of converting real-world data (RWD) into actionable real-world evidence (RWE); (4) a proven approach for practice transformation uses a structured (utilization management strategy, UMS) framework; (5) a balanced approach toward financial sustainability, including local and systemic financial strategies, is important; and (6) ensuring safe and effective progress requires a new, collaborative definition of regulatory science, aligning innovation with regulatory oversight to support technological advancements.
Conclusion: These key aspects offer a foundational framework for integrating new technologies into healthcare. Although not exhaustive, overlooking them would miss a significant opportunity to enhance patient care.