Diuretic treatment using the RenalGuard® system in patients hospitalized due to acute decompensated heart failure and characterization of the profile of patients with good and poor response to treatment - preliminary study.

Paweł Siwołowski, Piotr Gajewski, Mateusz Sokolski, Robert Zymliński, Mateusz Guzik, Joanna Szachniewicz, Piotr Ponikowski
{"title":"Diuretic treatment using the RenalGuard® system in patients hospitalized due to acute decompensated heart failure and characterization of the profile of patients with good and poor response to treatment - preliminary study.","authors":"Paweł Siwołowski, Piotr Gajewski, Mateusz Sokolski, Robert Zymliński, Mateusz Guzik, Joanna Szachniewicz, Piotr Ponikowski","doi":"10.5603/cj.102386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to analyze the potential relationship between the diuretic response, the clinical profile and the concentrations of selected biochemical markers and to identify a group of patients who will benefit from a new form of therapy combining standard diuretic therapy with the use of a RenalGuard® system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 19 patients (mean age 67 ± 10 years, 95% men) hospitalized due to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF, NYHA class III-IV, BP 125 ± 14/73 ± 16 mmHg, eGFR 58 ± 24) with persistent overhydration despite standard therapy. A targeted comparative analysis of selected clinical and biochemical parameters was performed to determine the parameters associated with a better diuretic response [good diuretic responders (GDR) group].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The good diuretic responders group had significantly lower levels of creatinine (1.23 ± 0.4 vs. 1.69 ± 0.35, p = 0.025) magnesium 0.70 ± 0.14 vs. 0.83 ± 0.09, p = 0.030) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN, 28 ± 11 vs. 39 ± 10, p = 0.045). Additionally, in GDR group a statistically significant greater ability to dilute urine in the 12th and 24th hour of therapy was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of the study indicate the potential use of the RenalGuard® system in combination with standard intravenous diuretic therapy for controlled dehydration in the treatment of a selected group of patients with ADHF. It is advisable to identify the detailed mechanisms of GDR and characterize this group of patients more precisely.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.102386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to analyze the potential relationship between the diuretic response, the clinical profile and the concentrations of selected biochemical markers and to identify a group of patients who will benefit from a new form of therapy combining standard diuretic therapy with the use of a RenalGuard® system.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of 19 patients (mean age 67 ± 10 years, 95% men) hospitalized due to acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF, NYHA class III-IV, BP 125 ± 14/73 ± 16 mmHg, eGFR 58 ± 24) with persistent overhydration despite standard therapy. A targeted comparative analysis of selected clinical and biochemical parameters was performed to determine the parameters associated with a better diuretic response [good diuretic responders (GDR) group].

Results: The good diuretic responders group had significantly lower levels of creatinine (1.23 ± 0.4 vs. 1.69 ± 0.35, p = 0.025) magnesium 0.70 ± 0.14 vs. 0.83 ± 0.09, p = 0.030) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN, 28 ± 11 vs. 39 ± 10, p = 0.045). Additionally, in GDR group a statistically significant greater ability to dilute urine in the 12th and 24th hour of therapy was found.

Conclusions: The results of the study indicate the potential use of the RenalGuard® system in combination with standard intravenous diuretic therapy for controlled dehydration in the treatment of a selected group of patients with ADHF. It is advisable to identify the detailed mechanisms of GDR and characterize this group of patients more precisely.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 RenalGuard® 系统对急性失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者进行利尿治疗,并对治疗效果好和不好的患者进行特征分析--初步研究。
研究背景本研究的目的是分析利尿剂反应、临床特征和选定生化指标浓度之间的潜在关系,并确定哪些患者将从结合标准利尿剂疗法和使用 RenalGuard® 系统的新疗法中受益:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是 19 名因急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF,NYHA III-IV 级,血压 125 ± 14/73 ± 16 mmHg,eGFR 58 ± 24)住院的患者(平均年龄 67 ± 10 岁,95% 为男性),尽管接受了标准治疗,但仍存在持续的过度水化现象。对选定的临床和生化参数进行了有针对性的比较分析,以确定与较好的利尿剂反应相关的参数[良好利尿剂反应者(GDR)组]:结果:利尿剂反应良好组的肌酐(1.23 ± 0.4 vs. 1.69 ± 0.35,p = 0.025)、镁(0.70 ± 0.14 vs. 0.83 ± 0.09,p = 0.030)和血尿素氮(BUN,28 ± 11 vs. 39 ± 10,p = 0.045)水平明显较低。此外,GDR 组在治疗的第 12 小时和第 24 小时稀释尿液的能力显著提高,具有统计学意义:研究结果表明,RenalGuard® 系统可与标准静脉利尿剂疗法相结合,用于治疗部分 ADHF 患者,以控制脱水。最好能确定 GDR 的详细机制,并更准确地描述这类患者的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A novel, patient-tailored method for non-invasive iFRCT measurement. Silent cerebral ischemic lesions in ablation-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: does the pulmonary vein anatomy matter? GENTLE-PACE - A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded research study comparinG the Efficacy and safety of cardioNeuroablaTion vs. permanent pacing in patients with an implantabLE PACEmaker for symptomatic bradycardia. Diuretic treatment using the RenalGuard® system in patients hospitalized due to acute decompensated heart failure and characterization of the profile of patients with good and poor response to treatment - preliminary study. The importance of etiologic factor identification in patients with infective endocarditis - results of tertiary center analysis (2015-2023).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1