Transcatheter mitral valve replacement - a new option for a selected group of patients?

Mariusz Kuśmierczyk, Adam Witkowski, Michał Zembala, Bogusław Kapelak, Marcin Gruchała, Andrzej Gackowski, Marek Deja, Wojciech Wojakowski, Marek Grygier, Marcin Grabowski, Ewa Kowalik, Piotr Przygodzki, Maciej Niewada, Michał Jakubczyk
{"title":"Transcatheter mitral valve replacement - a new option for a selected group of patients?","authors":"Mariusz Kuśmierczyk, Adam Witkowski, Michał Zembala, Bogusław Kapelak, Marcin Gruchała, Andrzej Gackowski, Marek Deja, Wojciech Wojakowski, Marek Grygier, Marcin Grabowski, Ewa Kowalik, Piotr Przygodzki, Maciej Niewada, Michał Jakubczyk","doi":"10.5603/cj.99752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most common valvular disease. Symptomatic MR is associated with a poor prognosis. Cardiac surgery is recommended in the severe form of the disease. If the surgical risk is high or functional mitral regurgitation repair/replacement cannot be combined with aorto-coronary bypass graft surgery, a transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair should be considered. Currently, there is no recommended procedure in patients with severe symptomatic MR, high cardiac surgical risk, and low probability of success or contraindications to the percutaneous edge-to-edge treatment. A recent alternative is the mitral valve implantation using a transapical approach or through the interatrial septum. Currently, the only CE-marked transcatheter bioprothesis valve using transapical approach and implanted without extracorporeal circulation support is the Tendyne valve. This paper discusses the safety, clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of this valve and the size of the target population in Poland. The clinical efficacy was evaluated in a study of 100 patients with severe symptomatic MR. The total 2-year mortality was 39%. The hospitalisation rate due to heart failure decreased from 1.3 events/year prior to the surgery to 0.51. MR was not recorded in 93.2% of the survivors. An economic analysis accounting for the survival, health-related quality of life, and the risk of hospitalisation due to heart failure showed that the Tendyne system is cost-effective compared to pharmacological treatment: the incremental cost-utility ratio equalled 93,324-110,696 PLN, depending on the approach, clearly below the official threshold in Poland. The annual number of eligible patients was estimated at 60.</p>","PeriodicalId":93923,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/cj.99752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most common valvular disease. Symptomatic MR is associated with a poor prognosis. Cardiac surgery is recommended in the severe form of the disease. If the surgical risk is high or functional mitral regurgitation repair/replacement cannot be combined with aorto-coronary bypass graft surgery, a transcatheter edge-to-edge valve repair should be considered. Currently, there is no recommended procedure in patients with severe symptomatic MR, high cardiac surgical risk, and low probability of success or contraindications to the percutaneous edge-to-edge treatment. A recent alternative is the mitral valve implantation using a transapical approach or through the interatrial septum. Currently, the only CE-marked transcatheter bioprothesis valve using transapical approach and implanted without extracorporeal circulation support is the Tendyne valve. This paper discusses the safety, clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of this valve and the size of the target population in Poland. The clinical efficacy was evaluated in a study of 100 patients with severe symptomatic MR. The total 2-year mortality was 39%. The hospitalisation rate due to heart failure decreased from 1.3 events/year prior to the surgery to 0.51. MR was not recorded in 93.2% of the survivors. An economic analysis accounting for the survival, health-related quality of life, and the risk of hospitalisation due to heart failure showed that the Tendyne system is cost-effective compared to pharmacological treatment: the incremental cost-utility ratio equalled 93,324-110,696 PLN, depending on the approach, clearly below the official threshold in Poland. The annual number of eligible patients was estimated at 60.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经导管二尖瓣置换术--特定患者群体的新选择?
二尖瓣反流(MR)是第二大常见的瓣膜疾病。有症状的二尖瓣反流预后较差。如果病情严重,建议进行心脏手术。如果手术风险较高或功能性二尖瓣反流修复/置换不能与主动脉-冠状动脉旁路移植手术相结合,则应考虑经导管的边缘到边缘瓣膜修复术。目前,对于有严重二尖瓣反流症状、心脏手术风险高、经皮边缘到边缘治疗成功概率低或有禁忌症的患者,还没有推荐的手术方法。最近的一种替代方法是采用经心尖方法或通过房间隔进行二尖瓣植入术。目前,唯一获得 CE 认证的经导管生物瓣膜是 Tendyne 瓣膜,该瓣膜采用经心尖方法植入,无需体外循环支持。本文讨论了该瓣膜的安全性、临床疗效和成本效益以及波兰的目标人群规模。一项针对 100 名严重症状 MR 患者的研究对其临床疗效进行了评估。2年总死亡率为39%。心衰住院率从手术前的每年 1.3 例降至 0.51 例。93.2%的幸存者没有 MR 记录。对存活率、与健康相关的生活质量以及因心衰住院的风险进行的经济分析表明,与药物治疗相比,Tendyne系统具有成本效益:根据不同的方法,增量成本效用比为93324-110696波兰兹罗提,明显低于波兰的官方标准。每年符合条件的患者人数估计为 60 人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Differences in coronary microcirculation measurements during regadenoson vs. adenosine - induced hyperemia. The impact of shock therapy on depression development and remote prognosis in cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients. Rationale and design of the MICE study: exploration of the temporal relation between electrical and mechanical events during myocardial ischemia. Insights from pulse field energy in patients with prosthetic mechanical heart valves undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation. A novel, patient-tailored method for non-invasive iFRCT measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1