Stephan L Cleveland, Carol A Carman, Niti Vyas, Jose H Salazar, Juan U Rojo
{"title":"Evidence-based approach for the generation of a multivariate logistic regression model that predicts instrument failure.","authors":"Stephan L Cleveland, Carol A Carman, Niti Vyas, Jose H Salazar, Juan U Rojo","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identification of instrument failure (IF) represents a point to improve the quality of services provided by medical laboratories. Here, a logistic regression model was created to define the relationship between instrument downtime and laboratory quality management systems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interval-level quality control (QC) and categorical quality assurance data from 3 identical chemistry analyzers was utilized to generate a logistic regression model able to predict IF. A case-control approach and the forward stepwise likelihood-ratio method was used to develop the logistic regression model. The model was tested using a case-control dataset and again using the complete sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 650 downtime events were identified. A total of 22,880 QC data points, 187 calibrations, 24 proficiency testing events, and 107 maintenance records were analyzed. The regression model was able to correctly predict 59.2% of no instrument downtime events and 69.2% of instrument downtime events using the case-control data. Using the entire data set, the sensitivity of the model was 69.2% and the specificity was 58.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A logistic regression model can predict instrument downtime nearly 70% of the time. This study acts as a proof of concept using a limited data set collected by the chemistry laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Identification of instrument failure (IF) represents a point to improve the quality of services provided by medical laboratories. Here, a logistic regression model was created to define the relationship between instrument downtime and laboratory quality management systems.
Methods: Interval-level quality control (QC) and categorical quality assurance data from 3 identical chemistry analyzers was utilized to generate a logistic regression model able to predict IF. A case-control approach and the forward stepwise likelihood-ratio method was used to develop the logistic regression model. The model was tested using a case-control dataset and again using the complete sample.
Results: A total of 650 downtime events were identified. A total of 22,880 QC data points, 187 calibrations, 24 proficiency testing events, and 107 maintenance records were analyzed. The regression model was able to correctly predict 59.2% of no instrument downtime events and 69.2% of instrument downtime events using the case-control data. Using the entire data set, the sensitivity of the model was 69.2% and the specificity was 58.2%.
Conclusion: A logistic regression model can predict instrument downtime nearly 70% of the time. This study acts as a proof of concept using a limited data set collected by the chemistry laboratory.