The Effect of Isometric Handgrip Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction on Changes in Resting Blood Pressure.

IF 1.6 Research quarterly for exercise and sport Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-20 DOI:10.1080/02701367.2024.2418567
Robert W Spitz, Vickie Wong, Yujiro Yamada, Ryo Kataoka, Jun Seob Song, William B Hammert, Aldo Seffrin, Zachary W Bell, Jeremy P Loenneke
{"title":"The Effect of Isometric Handgrip Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction on Changes in Resting Blood Pressure.","authors":"Robert W Spitz, Vickie Wong, Yujiro Yamada, Ryo Kataoka, Jun Seob Song, William B Hammert, Aldo Seffrin, Zachary W Bell, Jeremy P Loenneke","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2024.2418567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To investigate the effects of high-intensity contractions and low-intensity contractions with and without blood flow restriction on changes in blood pressure and hemodynamic parameters. A total of 179 participants (18-35 years) were randomly assigned to one of three training groups that exercised 3 times per week for six weeks or a non-exercise control group. The groups are as follows: 1) Control [CON, <i>n</i> = 44]; 2) completed 4 sets of two-minute isometric contractions at 30% maximal voluntary contraction [LI, <i>n</i> = 47]; 3) completed 4 sets of two-minute isometric contractions at 30% maximal voluntary contraction with a 12 cm cuff inflated to 50% of arterial occlusion pressure [LI+BFR, <i>n</i> = 41]; or 4) completed 4 maximal isometric contractions lasting 5 seconds [MAX, <i>n</i> = 47]. Blood pressure, vascular resistance, and reactive hyperemia were measured at pre and post. Data are presented as means (SD). There was no evidence that SBP (BF<sub>10</sub>: 0.066), DBP (BF<sub>10</sub>: 0.057), vascular resistance (BF<sub>10</sub>: 0.085), or peak reactive hyperemia changed (BF<sub>10</sub>: 0.044) or A.U.C. (BF<sub>10</sub>: 0.074). Change scores for SBP were 1.1 (6.7), 0.7 (5.8), -0.4 (6.5), and -0.9 (6.3) mmHg for CON, LI, LI+BFR, and MAX, respectively. DBP change scores were 1.5 (6.6), 1.5 (7), -0.7 (5.9), and 0.3 (6.3) mmHg for CON, LI, LI+BFR, and MAX, respectively. Although recommended as a non-pharmacological method of blood pressure control, isometric exercise with or without BFR did not lower blood pressure. Future work could examine the inclusion of a daily strength test prior to the low intensity protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"418-425"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2418567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the effects of high-intensity contractions and low-intensity contractions with and without blood flow restriction on changes in blood pressure and hemodynamic parameters. A total of 179 participants (18-35 years) were randomly assigned to one of three training groups that exercised 3 times per week for six weeks or a non-exercise control group. The groups are as follows: 1) Control [CON, n = 44]; 2) completed 4 sets of two-minute isometric contractions at 30% maximal voluntary contraction [LI, n = 47]; 3) completed 4 sets of two-minute isometric contractions at 30% maximal voluntary contraction with a 12 cm cuff inflated to 50% of arterial occlusion pressure [LI+BFR, n = 41]; or 4) completed 4 maximal isometric contractions lasting 5 seconds [MAX, n = 47]. Blood pressure, vascular resistance, and reactive hyperemia were measured at pre and post. Data are presented as means (SD). There was no evidence that SBP (BF10: 0.066), DBP (BF10: 0.057), vascular resistance (BF10: 0.085), or peak reactive hyperemia changed (BF10: 0.044) or A.U.C. (BF10: 0.074). Change scores for SBP were 1.1 (6.7), 0.7 (5.8), -0.4 (6.5), and -0.9 (6.3) mmHg for CON, LI, LI+BFR, and MAX, respectively. DBP change scores were 1.5 (6.6), 1.5 (7), -0.7 (5.9), and 0.3 (6.3) mmHg for CON, LI, LI+BFR, and MAX, respectively. Although recommended as a non-pharmacological method of blood pressure control, isometric exercise with or without BFR did not lower blood pressure. Future work could examine the inclusion of a daily strength test prior to the low intensity protocol.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有无血流限制的等长握手训练对静息血压变化的影响
研究高强度收缩和低强度收缩(有或无血流限制)对血压和血液动力学参数变化的影响。共有 179 名参与者(18-35 岁)被随机分配到每周锻炼 3 次、为期 6 周的三个训练组或不锻炼对照组中。各组情况如下1)对照组[CON,n = 44];2)完成 4 组两分钟等长收缩,最大自主收缩率为 30%[LI,n = 47];3)完成 4 组两分钟等长收缩,最大自主收缩率为 30%,同时将 12 厘米袖带充气至动脉闭塞压的 50%[LI+BFR,n = 41];或 4)完成 4 组持续 5 秒的最大等长收缩[MAX,n = 47]。测量前后的血压、血管阻力和反应性充血。数据以平均值(标清)表示。没有证据表明 SBP(BF10:0.066)、DBP(BF10:0.057)、血管阻力(BF10:0.085)或反应性充血峰值发生了变化(BF10:0.044)或 A.U.C.(BF10:0.074)。CON、LI、LI+BFR 和 MAX 的 SBP 变化分数分别为 1.1 (6.7)、0.7 (5.8)、-0.4 (6.5) 和 -0.9 (6.3) mmHg。CON、LI、LI+BFR 和 MAX 的 DBP 变化分数分别为 1.5 (6.6)、1.5 (7)、-0.7 (5.9) 和 0.3 (6.3) mmHg。尽管被推荐为控制血压的非药物方法,但进行或不进行 BFR 的等长运动并不能降低血压。未来的工作可以研究在低强度方案之前加入日常力量测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Magnitude of Rapid Weight Loss Affects Subjective Stress and Recovery in Elite Powerlifters at the World Championships: An Exploratory Analysis. Physiological and Placebo Effects of Beetroot Juice in Virtual Cycling Using the Balanced Placebo Design. An Integrated Analysis of Environmental, Team, and Parental Relations on Psychosocial Skills Development and Their Association With the Mental Health of Adolescent Athletes. Social Network Intervention in Physical Education Classes Through Social Support to Promote Physical Activity and Reduce Screen Time in Adolescents: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Thresholds Derived From Muscle NIRS Signal, Heart Rate Variability, and Ventilatory Parameters During an Incremental Cycling Test: An Agreement Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1