Strong Nongravitational Accelerations and the Potential for Misidentification of Near-Earth Objects

Aster G. Taylor, Darryl Z. Seligman, Matthew J. Holman, Peter Vereš, Davide Farnocchia, Nikole Lewis, Marco Micheli and Jason T. Wright
{"title":"Strong Nongravitational Accelerations and the Potential for Misidentification of Near-Earth Objects","authors":"Aster G. Taylor, Darryl Z. Seligman, Matthew J. Holman, Peter Vereš, Davide Farnocchia, Nikole Lewis, Marco Micheli and Jason T. Wright","doi":"10.3847/1538-4357/ad85e3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nongravitational accelerations in the absence of observed activity have recently been identified on near-Earth objects (NEOs), opening the question of the prevalence of anisotropic mass loss in the near-Earth environment. Motivated by the necessity of nongravitational accelerations to identify 2010 VL65 and 2021 UA12 as a single object, we investigate the problem of linking separate apparitions in the presence of nongravitational perturbations. We find that nongravitational accelerations on the order of 1 × 10–9 au day−2 can lead to a change in plane-of-sky positions of ∼1 × 103 arcsec between apparitions. Moreover, we inject synthetic tracklets of hypothetical nongravitationally accelerating NEOs into the Minor Planet Center orbit identification algorithms. We find that at large nongravitational accelerations (∣Ai∣ ≥ 1 × 10−8 au day−2) these algorithms fail to link a significant fraction of these tracklets. We further show that if orbits can be determined for both apparitions, the tracklets will be linked regardless of nongravitational accelerations, although they may be linked to multiple objects. In order to aid in the identification and linkage of nongravitationally accelerating objects, we propose and test a new methodology to search for unlinked pairs. When applied to the current census of NEOs, we recover the previously identified case but identify no new linkages. We conclude that current linking algorithms are generally robust to nongravitational accelerations, but objects with large nongravitational accelerations may potentially be missed. While current algorithms are well-positioned for the anticipated increase in the census population from future survey missions, it may be possible to find objects with large nongravitational accelerations hidden in isolated tracklet pairs.","PeriodicalId":501813,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad85e3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nongravitational accelerations in the absence of observed activity have recently been identified on near-Earth objects (NEOs), opening the question of the prevalence of anisotropic mass loss in the near-Earth environment. Motivated by the necessity of nongravitational accelerations to identify 2010 VL65 and 2021 UA12 as a single object, we investigate the problem of linking separate apparitions in the presence of nongravitational perturbations. We find that nongravitational accelerations on the order of 1 × 10–9 au day−2 can lead to a change in plane-of-sky positions of ∼1 × 103 arcsec between apparitions. Moreover, we inject synthetic tracklets of hypothetical nongravitationally accelerating NEOs into the Minor Planet Center orbit identification algorithms. We find that at large nongravitational accelerations (∣Ai∣ ≥ 1 × 10−8 au day−2) these algorithms fail to link a significant fraction of these tracklets. We further show that if orbits can be determined for both apparitions, the tracklets will be linked regardless of nongravitational accelerations, although they may be linked to multiple objects. In order to aid in the identification and linkage of nongravitationally accelerating objects, we propose and test a new methodology to search for unlinked pairs. When applied to the current census of NEOs, we recover the previously identified case but identify no new linkages. We conclude that current linking algorithms are generally robust to nongravitational accelerations, but objects with large nongravitational accelerations may potentially be missed. While current algorithms are well-positioned for the anticipated increase in the census population from future survey missions, it may be possible to find objects with large nongravitational accelerations hidden in isolated tracklet pairs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强非重力加速度与误认近地天体的可能性
最近在近地天体上发现了没有观测到活动的非轨道加速度,从而提出了近地环境中各向异性质量损失的普遍性问题。由于非轨道加速度是将 2010 VL65 和 2021 UA12 识别为单一天体的必要条件,我们研究了在存在非轨道扰动的情况下将不同天体联系起来的问题。我们发现,1 × 10-9 au day-2 数量级的非轨道加速度会导致两个天体之间的天平面位置发生 1 × 103 弧秒的变化。此外,我们还在小行星中心轨道识别算法中注入了假想的非引力加速近地物体的合成轨迹小块。我们发现,在大的非引力加速度(∣Ai∣ ≥ 1 × 10-8 au day-2)下,这些算法无法将这些轨迹中的很大一部分联系起来。我们还进一步证明,如果能够确定两个天体的轨道,那么无论非轨道加速度如何,这些小轨迹都会被连接起来,尽管它们可能与多个天体相连。为了帮助识别和链接非重力加速天体,我们提出并测试了一种新方法来搜索未链接的天体对。当应用于当前的近地天体普查时,我们恢复了以前确定的情况,但没有发现新的联系。我们得出的结论是,目前的链接算法一般对非轨道加速度具有鲁棒性,但具有较大非轨道加速度的天体有可能被遗漏。虽然目前的算法能够很好地应对未来勘测任务中普查数量的预期增长,但仍有可能发现隐藏在孤立的轨迹子对中的具有较大非轨道加速度的物体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expanding the Inventory of Molecule-rich Planetary Nebulae: New Observations of M4-17, Hu 1-1, M1-59, and Na 2 Whole-disk Sampling of Molecular Clouds in M83 Disk2Planet: A Robust and Automated Machine Learning Tool for Parameter Inference in Disk–Planet Systems A Search for Persistent Radio Sources toward Repeating Fast Radio Bursts Discovered by CHIME/FRB Constraining Quasar Feedback from Analysis of the Hydrostatic Equilibrium of the Molecular Gas in Their Host Galaxies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1