Forest disturbance shapes habitat selection but not migratory tendency for partially migratory ungulates

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecosphere Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70067
Teagan A. Hayes, Collin J. Peterson, Nicholas J. DeCesare, Chad J. Bishop, Colby B. Anton
{"title":"Forest disturbance shapes habitat selection but not migratory tendency for partially migratory ungulates","authors":"Teagan A. Hayes,&nbsp;Collin J. Peterson,&nbsp;Nicholas J. DeCesare,&nbsp;Chad J. Bishop,&nbsp;Colby B. Anton","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In forest management settings, disturbance resets forests to earlier successional stages, typically improving forage conditions for mule deer. Examining how forest disturbance influences mule deer behavior is important for guiding forest and wildlife management. We used GPS collar data collected between 2017 and 2019 from 136 adult female mule deer in three populations throughout western Montana, United States, to investigate how disturbance from burns (wildfire and prescribed fire) and timber harvest influenced three aspects of space-use behaviors: (1) probability of migration from winter range to summer range, (2) home range (second-order) selection by migrants on summer range, and (3) within-home range (third-order) selection. We hypothesized that deer would maximize use of disturbances during summer for nutritional benefits, predicting that deer with higher proportionate disturbance in their winter home range would be less likely to migrate away from those disturbances during summer. We predicted that migrants would select disturbances at the second and third orders. We found that proportionate disturbance in winter home ranges had no effect on the probability of migration. Among migrants, deer generally selected burns, timber harvests, and open-canopy habitat at the second order in all study areas, with particularly strong selection for 6- to 15-year-old disturbances. At population levels, selection for disturbances ceased at the third order. At individual levels, however, third-order selection for burns increased with availability, whereas selection for harvests decreased, suggesting burns may satisfy more resource needs than harvests. Our results emphasize how space-use fidelity constrains mule deer habitat selection. During summer, adherence to migratory strategies constrains the habitat available for second-order selection, preventing deer from exploiting disturbances that would otherwise be available had they remained resident in wintering areas. Second-order selection then determines disturbance availability within home ranges, affecting third-order behaviors. Although variance in selection behaviors among individuals was high, population-level patterns were remarkably similar among study areas, suggesting these responses may be generalizable to mule deer throughout the northern Rocky Mountains. Forest management practices like timber harvest, prescribed burns, and wildfire management within higher elevation areas of summer range used by migrants could yield the greatest nutritional benefits for mule deer.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In forest management settings, disturbance resets forests to earlier successional stages, typically improving forage conditions for mule deer. Examining how forest disturbance influences mule deer behavior is important for guiding forest and wildlife management. We used GPS collar data collected between 2017 and 2019 from 136 adult female mule deer in three populations throughout western Montana, United States, to investigate how disturbance from burns (wildfire and prescribed fire) and timber harvest influenced three aspects of space-use behaviors: (1) probability of migration from winter range to summer range, (2) home range (second-order) selection by migrants on summer range, and (3) within-home range (third-order) selection. We hypothesized that deer would maximize use of disturbances during summer for nutritional benefits, predicting that deer with higher proportionate disturbance in their winter home range would be less likely to migrate away from those disturbances during summer. We predicted that migrants would select disturbances at the second and third orders. We found that proportionate disturbance in winter home ranges had no effect on the probability of migration. Among migrants, deer generally selected burns, timber harvests, and open-canopy habitat at the second order in all study areas, with particularly strong selection for 6- to 15-year-old disturbances. At population levels, selection for disturbances ceased at the third order. At individual levels, however, third-order selection for burns increased with availability, whereas selection for harvests decreased, suggesting burns may satisfy more resource needs than harvests. Our results emphasize how space-use fidelity constrains mule deer habitat selection. During summer, adherence to migratory strategies constrains the habitat available for second-order selection, preventing deer from exploiting disturbances that would otherwise be available had they remained resident in wintering areas. Second-order selection then determines disturbance availability within home ranges, affecting third-order behaviors. Although variance in selection behaviors among individuals was high, population-level patterns were remarkably similar among study areas, suggesting these responses may be generalizable to mule deer throughout the northern Rocky Mountains. Forest management practices like timber harvest, prescribed burns, and wildfire management within higher elevation areas of summer range used by migrants could yield the greatest nutritional benefits for mule deer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林干扰影响栖息地选择,但不影响部分迁徙的有蹄类动物的迁徙趋势
在森林管理环境中,干扰会使森林恢复到较早的演替阶段,通常会改善骡鹿的饲料条件。研究森林干扰如何影响骡鹿的行为对于指导森林和野生动物管理非常重要。我们利用 2017 年至 2019 年期间收集的美国蒙大拿州西部三个种群中 136 只成年雌性骡鹿的 GPS 项圈数据,研究了烧荒(野火和规定火灾)和木材采伐造成的干扰如何影响空间利用行为的三个方面:(1)从冬季牧场迁移到夏季牧场的概率;(2)夏季牧场迁移者的家园范围(二阶)选择;以及(3)家园范围内(三阶)选择。我们假设,鹿在夏季会最大限度地利用干扰以获得营养益处,并预测冬季牧场中干扰比例较高的鹿在夏季迁移离开这些干扰的可能性较小。我们预测迁徙者会选择第二和第三等级的干扰。我们发现,冬季牧场的干扰比例对迁徙概率没有影响。在所有研究地区的迁徙者中,鹿一般会选择烧荒、木材采伐和二阶的开阔树冠栖息地,对6-15年的干扰的选择尤其强烈。在种群水平上,对干扰的选择在三阶时就停止了。然而,在个体水平上,对焚烧的三阶选择随着可用性的增加而增加,而对采伐的选择则减少,这表明焚烧可能比采伐更能满足资源需求。我们的研究结果强调了空间使用的忠实性如何限制了骡鹿对栖息地的选择。在夏季,坚持迁徙策略限制了可用于二阶选择的栖息地,使骡鹿无法利用如果它们留在越冬区就会出现的干扰。二阶选择决定了家园范围内的干扰可用性,从而影响三阶行为。虽然个体间的选择行为差异很大,但不同研究地区的种群水平模式非常相似,这表明这些反应可能适用于整个落基山脉北部的骡鹿。在迁徙者夏季活动的高海拔地区进行森林管理,如木材采伐、规定烧荒和野火管理,可为骡鹿带来最大的营养益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
期刊最新文献
How often are ecosystems top-down controlled? Experiments in grassland, grasshopper, and bird systems over time and space Agricultural mosaics offer nesting habitat to dabbling ducks in the arid Intermountain West of the United States Daily and seasonal variations of soil respiration from maize field under different water treatments in North China Tree damage risk across gradients in tree species richness and stand age: Implications for adaptive forest management Forest disturbance shapes habitat selection but not migratory tendency for partially migratory ungulates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1