Utility of Loneliness Status to Risk Stratification and Prediction of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-03046-x
Huaxin Sun, Wenchao Huang, Yan Luo, Shiqiang Xiong, Yan Tang, Guoshu Yang, Duan Luo, Xiaolin Zhou, Zhen Zhang, Hanxiong Liu
{"title":"Utility of Loneliness Status to Risk Stratification and Prediction of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation.","authors":"Huaxin Sun, Wenchao Huang, Yan Luo, Shiqiang Xiong, Yan Tang, Guoshu Yang, Duan Luo, Xiaolin Zhou, Zhen Zhang, Hanxiong Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03046-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Socioeconomic determinants are increasingly important factors in the integrated management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of loneliness status on AF recurrence remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cohort study based on patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation from 2017 to 2022. The Chinese version of the De Jong Gierveld scale (DJGLS) for evaluating loneliness degree was used. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors for recurrent AF. A multivariate model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) when adjusting the known risk covariates in several kinds of subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine hundred fifty-five patients with AF and mean age > 65 years finished long-term follow-up. The AF cluster with severe/extreme loneliness tended to live alone according to DJGLS scores. Multivariate Cox regression showed that loneliness status is an independent risk factor for AF recurrence by using a multivariate model with adjustments of some covariates (moderate loneliness: HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.47-2.77, P < 0.001; severe/extreme loneliness: HR 5.28; 95% CI 3.56-7.84, P < 0.001). Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with AF with a more severe degree of loneliness are more likely to have AF recurrence in the long-term follow-up (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) showed a mainly non-linear relationship between feeling lonely and AF recurrence (P overall < 0.001, P non-linear = 0.195). Receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) and time-dependent ROC curve indicated that the diagnostic value of loneliness status in predicting AF recurrence is stable and acceptable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A more severe degree of loneliness was positively associated with increased risk of AF recurrence. Loneliness status showed an acceptable diagnostic value in discriminating AF recurrence as an independent tripartite variable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-024-03046-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Socioeconomic determinants are increasingly important factors in the integrated management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The impact of loneliness status on AF recurrence remains unclear.

Methods: We conducted a cohort study based on patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation from 2017 to 2022. The Chinese version of the De Jong Gierveld scale (DJGLS) for evaluating loneliness degree was used. Multivariate Cox regression was performed to identify the independent risk factors for recurrent AF. A multivariate model was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) when adjusting the known risk covariates in several kinds of subgroups.

Results: Nine hundred fifty-five patients with AF and mean age > 65 years finished long-term follow-up. The AF cluster with severe/extreme loneliness tended to live alone according to DJGLS scores. Multivariate Cox regression showed that loneliness status is an independent risk factor for AF recurrence by using a multivariate model with adjustments of some covariates (moderate loneliness: HR 2.02; 95% CI 1.47-2.77, P < 0.001; severe/extreme loneliness: HR 5.28; 95% CI 3.56-7.84, P < 0.001). Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with AF with a more severe degree of loneliness are more likely to have AF recurrence in the long-term follow-up (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Restricted cubic spline (RCS) showed a mainly non-linear relationship between feeling lonely and AF recurrence (P overall < 0.001, P non-linear = 0.195). Receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) and time-dependent ROC curve indicated that the diagnostic value of loneliness status in predicting AF recurrence is stable and acceptable.

Conclusion: A more severe degree of loneliness was positively associated with increased risk of AF recurrence. Loneliness status showed an acceptable diagnostic value in discriminating AF recurrence as an independent tripartite variable.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤独状态对导管消融术后心房颤动复发的风险分层和预测作用
导言:在心房颤动(房颤)的综合管理中,社会经济因素日益成为重要因素。孤独状况对房颤复发的影响仍不明确:我们对 2017 年至 2022 年接受导管消融术的房颤患者进行了一项队列研究。采用中文版德琼-吉尔维尔德量表(DJGLS)评估孤独程度。为确定复发性房颤的独立风险因素,进行了多变量 Cox 回归。在对几种亚组中已知的风险协变量进行调整后,采用多变量模型估算出危险比(HR)及95%置信区间(CI):955 名平均年龄大于 65 岁的房颤患者完成了长期随访。根据DJGLS评分,患有严重/极度孤独的房颤群组倾向于独居。多变量 Cox 回归显示,通过使用多变量模型并对一些协变量进行调整,孤独状态是房颤复发的独立风险因素(中度孤独:HR:2.02;95% CI 1.47-2.77,P 结论:孤独感越严重,心房颤动复发的风险越高:更严重的孤独感与房颤复发风险的增加呈正相关。作为一个独立的三方变量,孤独状态在鉴别房颤复发方面具有可接受的诊断价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
Efanesoctocog Alfa Versus Emicizumab in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Haemophilia A Without Inhibitors. Efanesoctocog Alfa versus Standard and Extended Half-Life Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors. Utility of Loneliness Status to Risk Stratification and Prediction of Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation. Investigation of Severe Hypoglycemia Risk Among Patients with Diabetes Treated with Ultra-Rapid Lispro in Japan. Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Patients with MS: Results from the ESTEEM Phase 4 and PROCLAIM Phase 3 Studies with a Focus on Older Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1