Balancing risks of surgical complications and positive margins for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and elevated BMI: An institutional cohort study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116073
Israel Falade, Kayla Switalla, Astrid Quirarte, Molly Baxter, Daniel Soroudi, Harriet Rothschild, Shoko Emily Abe, Karen Goodwin, Merisa Piper, Michael Alvarado, Bao-Quynh Julian, Cheryl Ewing, Jasmine Wong, John Rose, Laura Esserman, Robert Foster, Rita A Mukhtar
{"title":"Balancing risks of surgical complications and positive margins for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast and elevated BMI: An institutional cohort study.","authors":"Israel Falade, Kayla Switalla, Astrid Quirarte, Molly Baxter, Daniel Soroudi, Harriet Rothschild, Shoko Emily Abe, Karen Goodwin, Merisa Piper, Michael Alvarado, Bao-Quynh Julian, Cheryl Ewing, Jasmine Wong, John Rose, Laura Esserman, Robert Foster, Rita A Mukhtar","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risks of postoperative complications in breast cancer patients vary by patient and tumor characteristics. Elevated BMI and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) increase risks of surgical complications and positive margins, respectively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients with BMI ≥30 ​kg/m<sup>2</sup> from an institutional ILC database. The primary outcome was surgical complication rate by procedure type. The secondary outcome was positive margin rates by surgical approach, stratified by T stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 154 analyzed patients, standard BCS, lumpectomy with oncoplastic closure, and simple mastectomy had the lowest complication rates (18.2 ​%, 17.0 ​%, 11.8 ​%). Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty and mastectomy with aesthetic closure had the highest rates (35.5 ​%, 33.3 ​%). The overall positive margin rate was 28.5 ​%, significantly higher in BCS vs. mastectomy (37.4 ​% vs. 15.0 ​%, p ​= ​0.003). Oncoplastic surgery significantly reduced positive margin rates in BCS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, 23.4 ​% of patients experienced surgical complications, with higher rates in oncoplastic/reconstructive approaches. However, oncoplastic surgery reduced positive margins, highlighting the importance of balancing risks for optimal surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"116073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risks of postoperative complications in breast cancer patients vary by patient and tumor characteristics. Elevated BMI and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) increase risks of surgical complications and positive margins, respectively.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with BMI ≥30 ​kg/m2 from an institutional ILC database. The primary outcome was surgical complication rate by procedure type. The secondary outcome was positive margin rates by surgical approach, stratified by T stage.

Results: Of 154 analyzed patients, standard BCS, lumpectomy with oncoplastic closure, and simple mastectomy had the lowest complication rates (18.2 ​%, 17.0 ​%, 11.8 ​%). Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty and mastectomy with aesthetic closure had the highest rates (35.5 ​%, 33.3 ​%). The overall positive margin rate was 28.5 ​%, significantly higher in BCS vs. mastectomy (37.4 ​% vs. 15.0 ​%, p ​= ​0.003). Oncoplastic surgery significantly reduced positive margin rates in BCS.

Conclusion: In this study, 23.4 ​% of patients experienced surgical complications, with higher rates in oncoplastic/reconstructive approaches. However, oncoplastic surgery reduced positive margins, highlighting the importance of balancing risks for optimal surgical planning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡乳腺浸润性小叶癌患者手术并发症和边缘阳性的风险:一项机构队列研究。
背景:乳腺癌患者术后并发症的风险因患者和肿瘤特征而异。体重指数(BMI)升高和浸润性小叶癌(ILC)分别会增加手术并发症和边缘阳性的风险:我们回顾性分析了机构 ILC 数据库中体重指数≥30 kg/m2 的患者。主要结果是手术类型的手术并发症发生率。次要结果是按T期分层的手术方式的阳性边缘率:结果:在分析的 154 名患者中,标准 BCS、带肿瘤整形闭合的肿块切除术和单纯乳房切除术的并发症发生率最低(18.2%、17.0%、11.8%)。肿瘤整形缩小乳房成形术和乳房切除加美学闭合术的并发症发生率最高(35.5%、33.3%)。总的阳性边缘率为 28.5%,BCS 与乳房切除术相比明显更高(37.4% 对 15.0%,P = 0.003)。肿瘤整形手术大大降低了BCS的边缘阳性率:结论:在这项研究中,23.4%的患者出现了手术并发症,肿瘤整形/重建方法的并发症发生率更高。然而,肿瘤整形手术降低了阳性边缘率,突出了平衡风险对最佳手术规划的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The multidisciplinary Landscape of gender affirmation surgical training. Are there any benefits to hospital consolidation? Global health experience among general surgery residents': Experiences, attitudes, and barriers. An organized approach to attract a diverse pool of applicants within a surgery residency program. Cricopharyngomyotomy: Outcomes of flexible endoscopic management of small and medium sized Zenker's diverticulum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1