A Comparison of two Maps of the Human Neocortex: the multimodal MRI-based parcellation of Glasser et al. (2016a), and the myeloarchitectonic parcellation of Nieuwenhuys and Broere (2023), as a first step toward a unified, canonical map.
{"title":"A Comparison of two Maps of the Human Neocortex: the multimodal MRI-based parcellation of Glasser et al. (2016a), and the myeloarchitectonic parcellation of Nieuwenhuys and Broere (2023), as a first step toward a unified, canonical map.","authors":"Rudolf Nieuwenhuys, Matthew F Glasser","doi":"10.1007/s00429-024-02860-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first, introductory part of this paper presents an overview of the long quest for a universal map of the human cortex, useful as a standard reference for all remaining studies on this brain part. It is pointed out that such a map does still not exist, but that systematic comparison of some recently produced 3D maps may well be conducive toward this important goal. Hence, the second part of this article is devoted to a detailed comparison of two of such maps, the multimodal MRI-based parcellation of Glasser et al. (Nature 536:171-178, 2016) and the myeloarchitectonic parcellation presented by Nieuwenhuys and Broere (Brain Struct Funct 228:1549-1559, 2023), with the specific aim to detect areal concordances between these two maps. In the search for these concordances, the following three criteria were used: (1) the relative or topological position of the various areas, (2) the relation of the areas to particular invariant sulci, and (3) the overall myelin content of the areas. In total 61 concordances were detected, most of which were located in the frontal and parietal lobes. These concordances were recorded in standard views of the two maps compared (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8), as well as in Table 1. We consider these findings as a first step towards the creation of a unified, consensus (canonical) parcellation of the human neocortex.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02860-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The first, introductory part of this paper presents an overview of the long quest for a universal map of the human cortex, useful as a standard reference for all remaining studies on this brain part. It is pointed out that such a map does still not exist, but that systematic comparison of some recently produced 3D maps may well be conducive toward this important goal. Hence, the second part of this article is devoted to a detailed comparison of two of such maps, the multimodal MRI-based parcellation of Glasser et al. (Nature 536:171-178, 2016) and the myeloarchitectonic parcellation presented by Nieuwenhuys and Broere (Brain Struct Funct 228:1549-1559, 2023), with the specific aim to detect areal concordances between these two maps. In the search for these concordances, the following three criteria were used: (1) the relative or topological position of the various areas, (2) the relation of the areas to particular invariant sulci, and (3) the overall myelin content of the areas. In total 61 concordances were detected, most of which were located in the frontal and parietal lobes. These concordances were recorded in standard views of the two maps compared (Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8), as well as in Table 1. We consider these findings as a first step towards the creation of a unified, consensus (canonical) parcellation of the human neocortex.
期刊介绍:
Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.