The effect of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia in elderly patients who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation surgery: a prospective, randomized-controlled trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY BMC Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1186/s12871-024-02805-1
Han Wu, Rui-Zhi Yang, Yu Chen, Ting Chen, Liang-Cheng Qiu, Xiao-Dan Wu
{"title":"The effect of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on postoperative analgesia in elderly patients who underwent proximal femoral nail anti-rotation surgery: a prospective, randomized-controlled trial.","authors":"Han Wu, Rui-Zhi Yang, Yu Chen, Ting Chen, Liang-Cheng Qiu, Xiao-Dan Wu","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02805-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As a fascial plane block technique, further exploration is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of a peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures. We aimed to evaluate whether opioid consumption during a PENG block is better than a conventional opioid-based program for postoperative pain management after proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the PENG block with the control group for elderly patients undergoing primary PFNA under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the cumulative administration of sufentanil during the first 48 h after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>110 participants (55 in each group) were included in the analysis. Cumulative Sufentanil consumption between the PENG group and the control group at 48 h was 132.6 ± 12.3 vs. 141.0 ± 15.3, with a difference of -8.4; 95% CI, -13.6 to -3.1, P = 0.002. Sufentanil consumption at 24 h was 78.3 ± 6.1 vs. 94.0 ± 10.2, with a difference of -15.7; 95% CI, -18.9 to -12.5, P < 0.001. There were statistical differences in the visual analogue scale score trajectories between the two groups at 48 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). The median time to first remedial analgesia was lower in the PENG block group than in the control group (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the time to first standing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Incorporating the PENG block into a multimodal analgesia regimen can decrease opioid consumption among elderly patients undergoing PFNA under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100054290, principal investigator: Xiao-dan, Wu, 13/12/2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11580488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02805-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As a fascial plane block technique, further exploration is needed to determine the safety and efficacy of a peri-capsular nerve group (PENG) block in elderly patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures. We aimed to evaluate whether opioid consumption during a PENG block is better than a conventional opioid-based program for postoperative pain management after proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA).

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the PENG block with the control group for elderly patients undergoing primary PFNA under general anesthesia. The primary outcome was the cumulative administration of sufentanil during the first 48 h after surgery.

Results: 110 participants (55 in each group) were included in the analysis. Cumulative Sufentanil consumption between the PENG group and the control group at 48 h was 132.6 ± 12.3 vs. 141.0 ± 15.3, with a difference of -8.4; 95% CI, -13.6 to -3.1, P = 0.002. Sufentanil consumption at 24 h was 78.3 ± 6.1 vs. 94.0 ± 10.2, with a difference of -15.7; 95% CI, -18.9 to -12.5, P < 0.001. There were statistical differences in the visual analogue scale score trajectories between the two groups at 48 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). The median time to first remedial analgesia was lower in the PENG block group than in the control group (P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in the time to first standing.

Conclusion: Incorporating the PENG block into a multimodal analgesia regimen can decrease opioid consumption among elderly patients undergoing PFNA under general anesthesia.

Trial registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100054290, principal investigator: Xiao-dan, Wu, 13/12/2021).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
股骨近端钉防旋转手术老年患者术后镇痛效果:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
背景:作为一种筋膜平面阻滞技术,我们需要进一步探讨股骨转子间骨折老年患者接受囊周神经组(PENG)阻滞的安全性和有效性。我们的目的是评估在股骨近端钉抗旋转术(PFNA)术后疼痛治疗中,PENG阻滞过程中阿片类药物的用量是否优于传统的阿片类药物治疗方案:我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机对照试验,比较了 PENG 阻滞与对照组对在全身麻醉下接受初级 PFNA 的老年患者的疗效。主要结果是术后 48 小时内舒芬太尼的累积用量:110 名参与者(每组 55 人)参与了分析。48小时内,PENG组和对照组的舒芬太尼累积用量分别为132.6 ± 12.3 vs. 141.0 ± 15.3,差异为-8.4;95% CI,-13.6 to -3.1,P = 0.002。24 小时内的舒芬太尼消耗量为 78.3 ± 6.1 vs. 94.0 ± 10.2,差异为 -15.7;95% CI,-18.9 至 -12.5,P 结论:舒芬太尼的消耗量与 PENG 阻滞剂的消耗量之间存在显著差异:将PENG阻滞纳入多模式镇痛方案可减少在全身麻醉下接受PFNA的老年患者的阿片类药物用量:该研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2100054290,主要研究者:吴晓丹,2021年12月13日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating virtual reality anatomy training for novice anesthesiologists in performing ultrasound-guided brachial plexus blocks: a pilot study. Comparison of the effects of remimazolam and dexmedetomidine on the quality of recovery in functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Effect of the modified NUTRIC score in predicting the prognosis of patients admitted to intensive care units. Inhibitory effect of low-dose esketamine on cough induced by sufentanil during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative impact on mental health status: a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial. Anesthetic anaphylactic shock in an emergency cesarean section: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1